208 Notes
9 5. S h o s t a k , Philip Roth, p. 249.
9 6. S e e H ö f f e , Aristotle, p. 62.
9 7. S h o s t a k , Philip Roth, p. 7.
9 8. S h o s t a k , Philip Roth, pp. 242–249.
EPILOGUE: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
1. E m m a n u e l L e v i n a s , Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority , trans.
Alphonso Lingis (The Hague, Boston, and London: Martinus Nijhoff,
1979), p. 50.
2. Bryan S. Turner, “Classical Sociology and Cosmopolitanism: A
Critical Defence of the Social,” The British Journal of Sociology , 57
(2006), 133–51 (p. 143).
3. David Harvey, Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom (New
York: Columbia University Press, 2009), p. 283.
4. P i e r r e M a c h e r e y , In a Materialist Way, trans. Ted Stolze (London:
Verso, 1998), p. 102.
5. See the instructively titled essay by F. Chernov, “Bourgeois
Cosmopolitanism and Its Reactionary Role,” in Bol’shevik: Theoretical
and Political Magazine of the Central Committee of the ACP , 45.5 (1949)
30–41.
6. B e n i t a P a r r y , Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique (London and
New York: Routledge, 2004), p. 11.