Contributions from European Symbolic Interactionists Reflections on Methods

(Joyce) #1

Wa ̈ngqvist (2011), for example, argue that adolescents anchor their identities in
romantic relationships and occupational contexts. Scholars who take account of the
inability to anchor identity within postmodern institutions (Turner, 1976), on
the other hand, generally stress the discursive processes of identity formation
(Glaeser, 2000; Lewin & Williams, 2009; Mason-Schrock, 1996; Muggleton, 2000;
Widdicombe, 1998; Williams & Copes, 2005).



  1. Just as the Balinese put their selves into symbolic play in animal form
    throughcockfights (Geertz, 1972),punks put their senses of self into play via slam
    dancing. Most participants strived to establish a prominent place within the pit.
    Above, Ian for example described how he vied to get to the front of the stage.
    Cooper, similarly, discussed how he “destroyed most of the people in the pit” in
    one of his journal entries. This is how punks balance the distinctiveness of their
    identity with group connection.

  2. They also signaled to participants that they were in a space in which they
    couldfreely enact their punk selves without worrying about being criticized or
    assaulted.

  3. Just as the Balinese deem only some cockfights “real” (those that success-
    fully dramatize and symbolically play out local status concerns), participants
    within the Southeastern scene deemed only certain types of shows and certain
    types of participation within them as real. Participants described energetic shows
    with lively mosh pits as meaningful but exhibited a dismissive attitude
    toward tame shows. Energetic shows not only generated the requisite conditions
    for activating identity through ritual (Collins, 2004)but carried an interpretive
    functionconstituting a punk reading of punk experience (Geertz, 1972). Many
    subjects described feelings of frustration with regard to their inability to establish
    identity and status within normative institutions. Mosh pits did not so much
    represent as enact these feelings. Like much punk style, moshing represented a
    highly ordered display of the disorder that participants felt in their personal lives
    (Hebdige, 1979). As a social form, it was homologous with the individual experi-
    ences of participants.

  4. See alsoRose’s (1962)and Katovichand Reese’s (1993)critiques of Mead’s
    “Enlightened,” discourse-oriented self.
    19.Hancock and Lorr (2013)notedthis finding as well in their study of hardcore
    punk concerts, asserting that the music at shows generated “a sense of social
    euphoria in which the individual self dissolves into the collective effervescence of
    the mosh pit” (p. 331).

  5. They have, however, attempted to link the quest for authentic selfhood with
    otherfactors, such as the intangible economy of postindustrial capitalism (Bell,
    1976),the residues of Romantic esthetics (Taylor, 1992), and the decline of the
    family (Lasch, 1976).

  6. I deal with these issues in a different paper, though they are also documented
    byBaron (1989), Gaines(1991), Muggleton (2000), andLewin and Williams (2009).

  7. Many symbolic interactionists, it should be noted, would likely dispute this
    claim.AsKatovich and Reese (1993)assert,the mid-century work of scholars like
    Goffman (1959, 1961)andBecker (1963)arguably preempted lamentations about
    the superficial and anchorless postmodern nonself that later emerged from continen-
    tal philosophy.


EcstaticRitual as a New Mode of Youth Identity Work 191

Free download pdf