Patient_Reported_Outcome_Measures_in_Rheumatic_Diseases

(ff) #1

38



  1. Generating a literature-review domains or scales.

  2. Defining the end-point models.

  3. Assorting the recall period.

  4. Formulating the conceptual framework using clinical expert opinion.

  5. Qualitatively interviewing a limited number of people from the concerned pop-
    ulation for revision of the preliminary framework.

  6. Qualitative analyzing interview transcripts to produce an exhaustive list of
    items from words taken from people.

  7. Generating a preliminary items list.

  8. Clinical and psychometric experts review.

  9. Production of the conceptual framework of outcomes.


Step II: Items and Scales Identification and Refinement



  1. Operationalization and content analysis to classify different items on different
    domains/scales of measurement.

  2. Setting different response options and format.

  3. Psychometric analysis with reduction of PROM items using different item selec-
    tion statistical processes.

  4. Clinical and psychometric expert review.

  5. Production of the preliminary version of the instrument and its content validity.


Step III: Pretesting of the Instrument



  1. Semi-structured cognitive interviews with individuals from the target popula-
    tion—a relatively larger number of respondents are required than step I.

  2. Identification of problems with items: ambiguity, confusion, layout and format
    of the instrument, and the proper mode of administration.

  3. Psychometric analysis and revision of the instrument on the base of respondents’
    recommendations.


Fig. 2.6 Major steps in developing a PROM instrument as conceptualized from different sources


M. El Gaafary
Free download pdf