Patient_Reported_Outcome_Measures_in_Rheumatic_Diseases

(ff) #1

58


the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the food and drug
administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6:522–31.


  1. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Lakshmi Sudeepthi B, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: a
    new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(4):137–44.

  2. Pashos CL, Klein EG, Wanke LA, editors. ISPOR Lexicon™. Princeton: International Society
    for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; 1998.

  3. Goreck C, Brown JM, Cano S, Lamping DL, Briggs M, Coleman S, Dealey C, McGinnis E,
    Nelson AE, Stubbs N, Wilson L, Nixon J. Development and validation of a new patient-
    reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument. Health
    Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:95.

  4. Luo Y, Yang J, Zhang Y. Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure
    for stroke patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:53.

  5. Embretson SE, Reise S. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum;
    2000.

  6. Reeve BB, Fayers P. Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire
    item and scale properties. In: Fayers P, Hays RD, editors. Assessing quality of life in clinical
    trials: methods of practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 53–73.

  7. Furr M, Bacharach VR. Chapter 13. Item response theory and Rasch models, Psychometrics:
    an introduction. New York: Sage; 2007.

  8. Smith LL, Reise SP. Gender differences on negative affectivity: an IRT study of differential
    item functioning on the multi-dimensional personality questionnaire stress reaction scale.
    J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75:1350–62.

  9. Meijer RR, Sijtsma K. Methodology review: evaluating person fit. Appl Psychol Meas.
    2001;25(2):107–35.


M. El Gaafary
Free download pdf