usatoday_20170111_USA_Today

(ff) #1

6CSPORTS
E6 WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2017


COLLEGES


Women’s basketball; times
p.m. Eastern


1. Connecticut (15-0)


Points: 775 (31 first-place votes).
Previous ranking: 1. Tuesday
result:
Beat No. 21 South Florida
102-37. Upcoming game: Sat-
urday at Southern Methodist.


2. Baylor (15-1)


Points: 734. Previous ranking:



  1. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day vs. TCU and Sunday at Kan-
    sas (ESPNU, 2).
    3. Maryland (15-1)


Points: 700. Previous ranking:



  1. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day vs. Penn State and Saturday
    at Iowa (BTN, 5).
    4. Mississippi State


(17-0)


Points: 681. Previous ranking:



  1. Upcoming games: Thursday
    vs. Florida (SEC, 9) and Monday
    vs. Mississippi (SEC, 7).
    5. South Carolina (13-1)


Points: 663. Previous ranking:



  1. Upcoming games: Thursday
    at Georgia (SEC, 7) and Sunday
    at LSU.
    6. Notre Dame (15-2)
    Points:
    625. Previous ranking:

  2. Upcoming games: Thursday
    vs. Pittsburgh and Monday at
    Tennessee (ESPN2, 7).
    7. Florida State (15-2)
    Points:
    570. Previous ranking:

  3. Upcoming games: Thursday
    vs. No. 8 Louisville and Sunday
    at Clemson.
    8. Louisville (15-3)
    Points:
    544. Previous ranking:

  4. Upcoming games: Thursday
    at No. 7 Florida State and Sun-
    day vs. No. 14 Miami (Fla.)
    (ESPN2, 1:30).
    9. Washington (16-2)
    Points:
    516. Previous ranking:

  5. Upcoming games: Friday at
    Arizona (Pac-12, 9) and Sunday
    at No. 18 Arizona State (Pac-12,
    8).
    10. Oregon State (15-1)
    Points:
    497. Previous ranking:

  6. Upcoming games: Friday at
    No. 13 UCLA (Pac-12, 9) and Sun-
    day at Southern California
    (Pac-12, 6).
    11. Ohio State (14-5)
    Points: 443. Previous ranking:
    13. Tuesday result: Lost to Michi-
    gan State 94-75. Upcoming
    game: Sunday at Purdue
    (ESPN2, 3:30).
    12. Stanford (13-3)
    Points: 423. Previous ranking:
    10. Upcoming games: Friday at
    Utah and Sunday at Colorado.
    13. UCLA (11-4)
    Points: 385. Previous ranking:
    7. Upcoming games: Friday vs.
    No. 10 Oregon State (Pac-12, 9)
    and Sun. vs. Oregon (Pac-12, 4).
    14. Miami (Fla.) (13-3)
    Points: 337. Previous ranking:
    14. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day vs. No. 16 Virginia Tech and
    Sunday at No. 8 Louisville
    (ESPN2, 1:30).
    15. Duke (14-2)
    Points: 328. Previous ranking:
    15. Upcoming games: Thursday
    vs. North Carolina and Sunday
    at No. 22 North Carolina State.
    16. Virginia Tech (15-0)
    Points: 291. Previous ranking:
    18. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day at No. 14 Miami (Fla.) and
    Monday vs. Wake Forest.
    17. Texas (11-4)
    Points: 288. Previous ranking:
    17. Tuesday result: Beat Oklaho-
    ma State 66-35. Upcoming
    game: Saturday at No. 19 West
    Virginia.
    18. Arizona State
    (12-3)
    Points: 270. Previous ranking:
    19. Upcoming games: Friday vs.
    Washington State and Sunday
    vs. No. 9 Washington (Pac-12, 8).
    19. West Virginia (14-2)
    Points: 258. Previous ranking:
    16. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day at Texas Tech and Saturday
    vs. No. 17 Texas.
    20. DePaul (14-4)
    Points: 173. Previous ranking:
    21. Tuesday result: Beat St.
    John’s 78-66. Upcoming games:
    Friday vs. Butler and Sunday vs.
    Xavier.
    21. South Florida (13-2)
    Points: 165. Previous ranking:
    22. Tuesday result: Lost to No. 1
    Connecticut 102-37. Upcoming
    game: Sat. vs. East Carolina.
    22. North Carolina
    State (13-4)
    Points: 101. Previous ranking:
    23. Upcoming games: Thursday
    at No. 24 Syracuse and Sunday
    vs. No. 15 Duke.
    23. California (13-3)
    Points: 87. Previous ranking:
    20. Upcoming games: Friday at
    Colorado and Sunday at Utah
    (Pac-12, 2).
    24. Syracuse (12-5)
    Points: 82. Previous ranking:
    25. Upcoming games: Thursday
    vs. No. 22 North Carolina State
    and Sunday at Georgia Tech.
    25. Oklahoma (12-4)
    Points: 63. Previous ranking:
    24. Upcoming games: Wednes-
    day at Iowa State and Saturday
    vs. Texas Tech.
    Dropped out: None.
    Others receiving votes: Wisconsin-Green Bay
    (13-2) 28; Oklahoma State (12-4) 10; Michigan
    (14-4) 8; Michigan
    State (13-4) 7;
    Tennessee (10-5) 7;
    Temple (11-3) 4;
    Northwestern
    (13-4) 3; Kansas
    State (12-4) 2;
    Saint Louis (13-3)
    2; Texas A&M
    (12-4) 2; Creighton
    (11-5) 1; LSU (13-3)
    1; Tulane (10-6) 1.
    Note: One ballot is missing. Ali Jaques of Siena
    could not be reached before the voting deadline.
    The USA TODAY Sports board of coaches is made
    up of 32 head coaches at Division I institutions.
    All are members of the Women’s Basketball
    Coaches Association.
    1. Clemson (14-1)


Points: 1,500 (60 first-place
votes). Previous ranking: 3.
Bowl result: Beat then-No. 2
Ohio State 31-0 in the Fiesta
Bowl and beat then-No. 1 Ala-
bama 35-31 in the College Foot-
ball Playoff championship
game.


2. Alabama (14-1)


Points: 1,440. Previous ranking:



  1. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 4
    Washington 24-7 in the Peach
    Bowl and lost to then-No. 3
    Clemson 35-31 in the College
    Football Playoff championship
    game.
    3. Oklahoma (11-2)


Points: 1,308. Previous ranking:



  1. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 17
    Auburn 35-19 in the Sugar Bowl.
    4. Washington (12-2)


Points: 1,265. Previous ranking:



  1. Bowl result: Lost to then-No. 1
    Alabama 24-7 in the Peach Bowl.
    5. Southern California
    (10-3)
    Points: 1,263. Previous ranking:
    9. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 5
    Penn State 52-49 in the Rose
    Bowl.
    6. Ohio State (11-2)
    Points: 1,186. Previous ranking:
    2. Bowl result: Lost to then-No. 3
    Clemson 31-0 in the Fiesta Bowl.
    7. Penn State (11-3)
    Points: 1,123. Previous ranking:
    5. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 9 Southern California 52-
    in the Rose Bowl.
    8. Florida State (10-3)
    Points: 1,102. Previous ranking:
    10. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 6
    Michigan 33-32 in the Orange
    Bowl.
    9. Wisconsin (11-3)
    Points: 1,044. Previous ranking:
    8. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 14
    Western Michigan 24-16 in the
    Cotton Bowl.
    10. Michigan (10-3)
    Points: 986. Previous ranking:
    6. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 10 Florida State 33-32 in the
    Orange Bowl.
    11. Oklahoma State
    (10-3)
    Points: 922. Previous ranking:
    13. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 11
    Colorado 38-8 in the Alamo
    Bowl.
    12. Stanford (10-3)
    Points: 791. Previous ranking:
    16. Bowl result: Beat North
    Carolina 25-23 in the Sun Bowl.
    13. Florida (9-4)
    Points: 673. Previous ranking:
    18. Bowl result: Beat then-No. 25
    Iowa 30-3 in the Outback Bowl.
    14. LSU (8-4)
    Points: 641. Previous ranking:
    20. Bowl result: Beat then-
    No. 15 Louisville 29-9 in the Citrus
    Bowl.
    15. Colorado (10-4)
    Points: 634. Previous ranking:
    11. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 13 Oklahoma State 38-8 in
    the Alamo Bowl.
    16. Virginia Tech (10-4)
    Points: 632. Previous ranking:
    19. Bowl result: Beat Arkansas
    35-24 in the Belk Bowl.
    17. West Virginia (10-3)
    Points: 522. Previous ranking:
    12. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    unranked Miami (Fla.) 31-14 in
    the Russell Athletic Bowl.
    18. Western Michigan
    (13-1)
    Points: 449. Previous ranking:
    14. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 8 Wisconsin 24-16 in the
    Cotton Bowl.
    19. South Florida (11-2)
    Points: 362. Previous ranking:
    22. Bowl result: Beat South
    Carolina 46-39 in the Birming-
    ham Bowl.
    20. Louisville (9-4)
    Points: 338. Previous ranking:
    15. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 20 LSU 29-9 in the Citrus
    Bowl.
    21. Utah (9-4)
    Points: 303. Previous ranking:
    23. Bowl result: Beat Indiana
    26-24 in the Foster Farms Bowl.
    22. Auburn (8-5)
    Points: 230. Previous ranking:
    17. Bowl result: Lost to then-
    No. 7 Oklahoma 35-19 in the
    Sugar Bowl.
    23. Miami (Fla.) (9-4)
    Points: 229. Previous ranking:
    Not ranked. Bowl result: Beat
    then-No. 12 West Virginia 31-14 in
    the Russell Athletic Bowl.
    24. Tennessee (9-4)
    Points: 211. Previous ranking:
    Not ranked. Bowl result: Beat
    then-No. 21 Nebraska 38-24 in
    the Music City Bowl.
    25. San Diego State
    (11-3)
    Points: 102. Previous ranking:
    Not ranked. Bowl result: Beat
    Houston in the Las Vegas Bowl
    34-10.


Dropped out: No. 21 Nebraska (9-4), No. 24
Temple (10-4), No. 25 Iowa (8-5).
Others receiving votes: Nebraska (9-4) 46;
Kansas State (9-4) 44; Georgia Tech (9-4) 24;
Western Kentucky (11-3) 23; Boise State (10-3)
20; Air Force (10-3) 18; Iowa (8-5) 17; Temple
(10-4) 16; Tulsa
(10-3) 11; Minne-
sota (9-4) 7;
Georgia (8-5) 5;
Navy (9-5) 3; Wake
Forest (7-6) 3;
Arkansas (7-6) 2;
Troy (10-3) 2;
Washington State
(8-5) 2; Brigham
Young (9-4) 1.
Note: Four ballots are missing after four coaches
could not be reached by the voting deadline.
The Amway board of coaches is made up of 64
head coaches at Football Bowl Subdivision
schools. All are members of the American
Football Coaches Association.

TAMPA The play is called Crush,
a staple of Clemson’s offense. As
co-offensive coordinator Jeff
Scott lobbied for the Tigers to run
it one last time this season with
nothing less than a national title
at stake, he had to step back and
appreciate the ending they were
about to write.
As Scott saw it unfold Monday
night, the best quarterback ever
to wear a Clemson uniform was
going to take a snap with six sec-
onds left, sprint to his right so he
could get the ball out before time
expired and fling it to a 5-foot-
nothing receiver who had drawn
little interest from the Football
Bowl Subdivision, walked on at
Clemson and was about to walk
out of Raymond James Stadium
as a national champion.
Hunter Renfrow’s catch from
Deshaun Watson with one second
left to give Clemson a 35-31 win
against Alabama and its first title
since 1981 might go down as the
most famous play in school histo-
ry. And for Scott, it represented
everything about what has made
Clemson and Dabo Swinney, an-
other former walk-on receiver,
the perfect vehicle to put a dent
in Alabama’s dynasty.
“It’s two ends of the spectrum:
A five-star (recruit) to a guy that
was a walk-on, and that really
kind of epitomizes our program,”
Scott said. “No matter how highly
recruited you were, there’s an ap-
preciation and love for every sin-
gle guy in this program, and that
starts at the top.”
In the blur of tension-filled


drives and exhilarating plays over
the final 6^1 ⁄ 2 minutes, which
called for Clemson to go 88 yards
to take the lead and then another
68 after Alabama’s touchdown
with 2:07 left, it was no surprise
the Tigers leaned on Renfrow in
the moment that mattered most.
Ever since he stepped on cam-
pus, turning down scholarships
from the likes of Furman and Ap-
palachian State because he want-
ed to play for Clemson, there has
been something special about
Renfrow, who looks like he’d fit in
more in Clemson’s computer sci-
ence program than a football fa-
cility filled with blue-chip re-
cruits and physical players.
“We can’t cover him in prac-
tice,” Clemson defensive coordi-
nator Brent Venables said.
A year ago, Renfrow had a sea-
son-high seven catches for 88
yards vs. Alabama in the national
title game. But before that, he had
earned the full respect of Watson
and Clemson’s bevy of talented
and highly recruited skill players.

“We call Renfrow ‘White Choc-
olate,’ ” running back Wayne
Gallman said. “He’s just one of
the greatest receivers I’ve seen at
Clemson. He just does everything
right. It’s crazy the stuff he can
do. You look at him and don’t
think he can do anything that he’s
doing, but he is.”
Said receiver Artavis Scott,
who set the pick that drew two
Alabama defenders on the final
play, allowing Renfrow to spring
free: “He’s just a little sniper.
When you look at him, you think,
‘Who’s this white receiver?’ He
lulls people to sleep, and he’s an
amazing guy.”
Of Clemson’s 99 offensive
snaps Monday, Renfrow was on
the field for 98, underlining the
trust he has earned and the effec-
tive role he was having against
Alabama. He finished with 92
yards on 10 catches and two
touchdowns, making one clutch
play after another and epitomiz-
ing Clemson’s unique mix of elite
recruiting and spot-on evaluation

of developmental talents.
Every day during his 2014
freshman season on the scout
team, Renfrow had to face the
likes of Mackensie Alexander and
Stephone Anthony, who parlayed
their Clemson careers into early-
round picks in the NFL draft.
And more often than not, Ren-
frow made his presence known.
“About a year and a half ago, I
was still a walk-on. Nobody really
knew about me,” Renfrow said.
“It all started in practice. Those
guys were the No. 1 defense in the
nation, and that’s something I’ve
carried over, that if I can get open
against those guys and the guys
we have now, I can get open
against anyone.”
In retrospect, the series of
plays that culminated with Ren-
frow’s catch couldn’t have worked
out more perfectly for the Tigers.
But it also revealed that Ala-
bama’s defense was increasingly
mortal the more Clemson pos-
sessed the ball in the second half.
As Alabama failed to get a first
down on its first three drives of
the second half and then went
three-and-out on its first two pos-
sessions of the fourth quarter, its
defense was left vulnerable to an
alarming number of plays.
Only Arkansas this season had
more than 80 snaps vs. Alabama.
As the game wore on and the Ti-
gers approached 70, 80 and then
90 plays, they could sense fatigue
from the Crimson Tide defense.
“We told our guys, even though
they’re a very talented defense,
they had less depth than last
year,” Scott said. “Last year they
rolled a lot of guys up front, and
four quarters is like a 10-round
boxing match and you have to get
them in those last two or three
rounds to get them down. Our OL

kept coming back to the sideline
saying, ‘They’re tired, and we’re
playing our best when we’re going
fast.’ ”
By the time Clemson crawled
back within 24-21 early in the
fourth quarter, the vibe of the
game had shifted. As Watson
picked apart Alabama’s secondary
en route to a go-ahead score, the
question was whether he’d need
to win the game a second time.
When Alabama’s offense finally
found life, scoring on a 30-yard
run by quarterback Jalen Hurts
to retake the lead, 31-28, Watson
got his answer.
“I just smiled when they
scored,” he said. “I’d seen 2 min-
utes and 1 second on the clock,
and I just knew. I just told my
guys, ‘Hey, let’s be legendary. Let’s
go be great.’ I told myself, ‘They
left too much time on the clock.’ ”
Crush, as it turned out, would
soon bring Clemson the title.
“I knew they were going to
play straight cover zero man, and
I knew if (Scott) made his block
to get the little pick, Renfrow was
going to get in the end zone,”
Wa t s o n sa i d. “ I k ind of smile, and
I knew before I even snapped the
ball it was going to be a touch-
down. All I had to do was get the
ball to him.”
All week, Clemson has felt like
its destiny was to get showered
with confetti and take this party
back to the Upstate. All the Tigers
needed to do was execute one of
their signature plays one more
time. From a five-star to a walk-
on, it worked to perfection.
“We have that play ready at all
times,” Scott said. “We can run it
wherever we want on the field. It
was a great setup. We knew we
had it. I knew it was a touchdown.
It works. No one can stop it.”

EX-WALK-ON RENFROW MONEY IN CLUTCH


MARK J. REBILAS, USA TODAY SPORTS
Clemson’s Hunter Renfrow hauls in the game-winning TD pass.

Dan Wolken
@danwolken
USA TODAY Sports

Free download pdf