Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century

(Greg DeLong) #1

Third, the constitutional adjudication system is institutionalized mainly to


control legislative and executive powers.


Fourth, the Constitution has a Bill of Rights in which a comprehensive list of


basic rights ranging from civil and political rights to social, economic, and cultural


rights are enumerated.


Fifth, since the first constitution of 1948 , a special constitutional concern has


been given to the market economy to intervene in the relationship between the


state and civil society.


ii. major political developments since 2000


The politics of constitutional revision


Since the consolidation of democratization, dissatisfaction with the present consti-


tution has surfaced with a bid for constitutional amendment or revision. Unlike


previous constitutional revisions, this movement has been initiated not only by


politicians but also civil society across various political or social spectra. However,


three major reasons can be summarized and commented on with regard to the


causes of discomfort.


First, the present constitution was criticized for not reflecting many Korean


people’s genuine will or their ideals of democracy and the rule of law, though some


important progress, such as popular direct presidential election and the introduction


of the Constitutional Court system, was accomplished through it. The egotistical


influence of the then powerful political leaders, Roh Tae-woo, Kim Young-sam,


Kim Dae-jung, and Kim Jong-pil has generally been blamed. However, such a


simplistic criticism has failed to convince the general public, and criticism of the


present constitution must also acknowledge the precarious circumstances that


brought about constitutional change in and around 1987.


Second, criticisms focus upon the form of government and/or the term of the


president. The form of government which the present constitution envisaged was a


balanced separation of powers between the National Assembly and the president.


However, the current system can be very unstable because, according to the change


of political situation, it may result in either an imperial presidency or a divided


government. Another source of criticism is the president’s lack of accountability,


which originated from a single-term limitation. These criticisms may be questioned


in terms of whether such problems can only be solved by constitutional revision,


which may in turn have unnecessary sociopolitical costs, as well as financial costs,


because such aims may well be achieved by other means.


Third, the Korean constitution needs to reflect the changed atmosphere within


and outside the Korean peninsula, where confrontation between South and North


Korea causes fundamental constitutional issues. The vicissitudes of globalization


and the creation of economic blocs have transformed the relationship between


78 Kim

Free download pdf