It’s observable from Table4.32that the redundant proportions of R&D Staff
with Senior Title and R&D Grants in DEA-inefficient universities are considerably
high in 2006–2010, and their five-year averages are −61.22 and −61.30%
respectively. From Fig.4.22, we can observe a downward trend on these two
indicators.(2) Analysis on the 985Us and non-985Us
It’s observable from Table4.33and Fig.4.22that, on the indicators of R&D
Staff with Senior Title and R&D Grants, the redundant proportions of
DEA-inefficient 985Us are lower than those of non-985Us in 2006–2010. This
reflects that the research efficiency of 985Us is better than that of non-985Us.
It can be known from Table4.33that, thefive-year averages of redundant
proportions of 985UsI on the two indicators are−53.78 and−51.93% respectively,
and those of non-985Us are−64.13 and−65.05% respectively. And by Fig.4.23,Table 4.35 Average redundant proportion of R&D grants of DEA-inefficient units by university
location (HSS)R&D grants
2006 (%) 2007 (%) 2008 (%) 2009 (%) 2010 (%) Means (%)
East −68.96 −55.90 −63.69 −59.36 −55.10 −60.60
JJJ −69.35 −52.74 −58.37 −62.26 −56.54 −59.85
HSZ −67.04 −58.13 −65.58 −53.40 −53.01 −59.43
Other −71.31 −57.49 −68.99 −63.81 −55.37 −63.39
Central −63.67 −57.93 −58.23 −54.84 −56.02 −58.14
West −75.34 −62.28 −73.18 −62.58 −58.12 −66.30Fig. 4.22 Average redundant
proportion of research inputs
of DEA-inefficient units
(HSS)4.2 Overall Status and Change of 211Us’Research Production... 151