A Companion to Research in Teacher Education

(Tina Sui) #1

government. When asked about future plans eight said they plan to retire. Being an
LTE as many of our participants noted was a privilege but was demanding phys-
ically, intellectually, and emotionally. How long can LTEs continue to work under
conditions which they feel dismiss their knowledge/expertise and question their
ability?
Teacher educators are charged with guiding their student teachers through the
roiling waves of education. This is not an easy task given work intensification,
competing demands, levels of compliance imposed on them, short timelines, limited
funding, and hierarchy within schools of education. Studying the multifaceted work
of teacher educators should continue because it is hoped that the neoconservative
trend in education will eventually subside and teacher educators will once again be
at the decision-making table. Research on them through these troubled times makes
explicit their difficult reality.


Acknowledgements We wish to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
Canada for their generous support of this research.


References


Ellis, V., McNicholl, J., Blake, A., & McNally, J. (2014). Academic work and proletarianisation:
A study of higher education-based teacher educators.Teaching and Teacher Education, 40,
33 – 43.
Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the reform of teacher education in England.
The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50.
Gilroy, P. (2014). Policy interventions in teacher education: Sharing the English experience.
Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 622–632.
Goodwin, L. A., & Kosnik, C. (2013). Quality teacher educators = quality teachers?:
Conceptualizing essential domains of knowledge for those who teach teachers.Teacher
Development: An International Journal of Teachers’Professional Development, 17(3), 334–346.
Kosnik, C., Menna, L., Dharmashi, P., Miyata, C., Cleovoulou, Y., & Beck, C. (2015). Four
spheres of knowledge required: An international study of the professional development of
literacy/English teacher educators.Journal of Education for Teaching, 4(1), 52–77.
Kumashiro, K. (2014).Review of proposed 2015 federal teacher preparation regulations. National
Education Policy Centre. Retrieved January 29, 2015.http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/
review-proposed-teacher-preparation
Louden, L. (2008). 101 Damnations: The persistence of criticism and the absence of evidence
about teacher education in Australia.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4),
357 – 368.
Loughran, J. (2006).Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding about teaching
and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.
MacBeath, J. (2012). Teacher training, education of learning by doing in the UK. In
L. Darling-Hammond & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Teacher education around the world:
Changing policies and practices(pp. 66–80). New York: Routledge.
Merriam, S. (2009).Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from thefield.Teaching
and Teacher Education, 21(2), 125–142.


150 C. Kosnik et al.

Free download pdf