trying standing water, air stones, small containers, large
containers, frozen spinach, and fresh spinach. To provide
the worms with stable water conditions, I used 2.4-gallon
(9-L tubs) with foam filters and airlifters. I couldn’t find
an airlifter that would work for a water depth of only
3.9–4.3 inches (10–11 cm), so I built my own mini air-
lifter out of a 0.5-inch (13-mm) tube, which I filled with
sand and closed at both ends with small wooden plugs.
After placing it in the oven for four minutes at 284°F
(140°C), I bent it around a cylindrical steel weight on
the kitchen counter. I quickly cooled it with the help of
a water sprayer. To make the injector, I drilled numerous
1.2-mm holes in the bottom end and covered them with
a short piece of 20-mm tube, into which I glued a 6-mm
tube as the nipple for the airline. The thicker tube was
sealed with O-rings on both ends.
Despite using this airlifter, the Microfex almost
died off, until I started giving them very large amounts
of food. Only when I left several large spinach leaves
floating in the tub did their numbers increase consider-
ably—they formed clumps on various spots on the leaves.
At last I had succeeded in producing enough to feed my
fishes a sufficient amount every day. After that I provided
the Microfex with plenty of blanched spinach and iceberg
or buttercrunch lettuce, and the worms developed well.
A tiny contaminant
I did not pay much attention when I discovered a few
small contaminants, since they had appeared occasionally
in my aquariums and in heavily algaed culture bottles on
the windowsill—I assumed they were Cyclops. My at-
tempts to culture them on the windowsill by adding other
foods, such as crushed fish food tablets, had all failed, so I
assumed they would not multiply or have much effect on
the worms. But I noticed that the water quality deterio-
rated quickly a few days after a water change, and the
Microfex populations leveled off or even declined.
So I began to change the water in the tubs every day.
The reproduction rate of the Microfex increased steeply,
but after two or three weeks it fell off again despite an
ample supply of food and clean water. I then removed
the food and animals from the tubs and cleaned them.
To my surprise, the entire bottoms of the tubs were
covered with Cyclops.
Over time, I realized that when the Microfex popula-
tion declined, the number of Cyclops increased. Strangely,
better hygiene did not decrease their numbers. On the
contrary, they seemed comfortable under these condi-
tions, as did the Microfex, and increased accordingly.
When the critters were removed, all it did was make
space for their offspring.
As they kept coming back stubbornly and continued
to multiply, I began to take a closer look at them under
the microscope. The body is white and on each side there
is a small pouch; the overall size is about 1 millimeter.
In addition to doing an online search, I asked questions
on several Internet forums. Most people said that they
were ostracods (seed shrimp), but they definitely are not.
Online information about microorganisms and arthro-
pods did not help.
On a goby forum, Jutta Bauer confirmed my suspi-
cion that they were a small Cyclops species. The small
bags on the sides are egg sacs, which only females carry.
Cyclops nauplii make an excellent rearing food due to
their small size. In addition, adult Cyclops are the favorite
food of Microphis deocata, the Rainbow Belly Pipefish
from India, one of my absolute favorite animals.
Culture trials
Apparently, it has not yet been possible to reproduce
these Cyclops in significant numbers. Since I already
knew that I was going to receive some Microphis from
AMAZONAS
Left: Drawing of
a Cyclops with
egg sacs.
Right: Microfex
can be cultured
in expanded
clay pellets used
in hydroponics
and commonly
sold as “Clay
Pebbles.”