Golf Asia — January 2018

(sharon) #1
GOLF ASIA 41

Given how profligate we are with golf
balls, you can start to see how valuable
the Pro V1 and its successors have
been for Titleist and its parent company
Acushnet. This commercial power was
shown clearly last year when Acushnet
was floated on the stock market. Ball
sales represented more than a third
of the value of the company, which
contains several other famous golfing
brand names, including Footjoy shoes
and gloves, Pinnacle and, of course, the
Titleist club maker.


2017: THE YEAR OF CHANGE
In 2017 the choice of ball became wider.
Each of the major brand names launched
new or upgraded versions of their
premium ball while we have also seen
a fragmentation of the market as a new
breed of manufacturer emerges – from
Costco’s Kirkland Signature through to
Snell, Vice, Clear and Volvik.
In addition, Nike’s decision to close its
ball and club division meant that 18 tour
players were free agents at the start of
the year, including some of the world’s
most famous and influential names,
from Rory, DJ and Jason Day to Hideki
Matsuyama and Bubba Watson. Each
played new balls in 2017.
But this may be of limited use when it
comes to the job of choosing the right
ball for you, as the various marketing
stories told about the premium tour
balls tend to focus on one aspect –
softness, compression, spin rates etc



  • making the decision as to the best
    overall ball opaque.
    Golf balls are important because,
    unlike clubs, bags, shoes and clothing,
    we are always losing them. Over 500
    million golf balls are lost each year and
    that lake in front of the green on your
    home course probably contains around
    1,000 of them at any one time.
    Recent research commissioned
    by Bridgestone shines a light on the
    psychology of golfers. We lose around
    four balls a round on average and
    most of us carry around nine spares
    in our bag on the first tee. A quarter of


British golfers say that using just one
ball a round is a ‘great achievement’
and as we get better, we’re far more
likely to change balls at the halfway
hut. The same Bridgestone report went
in to the factors impacting our buying
behaviour. ‘Feel’ is by far the number
one factor mentioned when buying a
ball, particularly for better players. This
is followed by ‘durability’ and ‘spin
rate’ despite more than two thirds of us
remaining ignorant of the composition

‘Acushnet and Titleist remain market


leaders by some margin. The company


expects to generate between US$1.55


and US$1.57 billion in revenue in 2017.’


of the ball we are playing. Brand name
ranked fifth in the list behind technology
and price.
More surprisingly, the research
suggested that handicap golfers
put very little emphasis on ‘used by
Tour pros’ when making their buying
decision. This last point goes against
the industry received wisdom, in which
big name endorsement is the most
significant ploy in the industry playbook
all but created by Titleist.

Billy Andrade’s victory in
the 2000 Invensys Open
in Las Vegas was the
first event on a major
professional tour won
using a Titleist Pro V1
golf ball.
Free download pdf