Mother Jones - May 01, 2018

(Michael S) #1
MAY  JUNE 2018 | MOTHER JONES 5

TO OUR READERS

YOU’VE BEEN


HACKED


We’re only beginning to understand how our
democracy was rigged—and what we can do about it.

BY MONIKA BAUERLEIN AND CLARA JEFFERY

one of the most important pieces of political
prognosis of the past decade appeared in the Wall
Street Journal on March 4, 2010. It was a look ahead
at that year’s midterm elections, the first chance
for voters to render a verdict on a new president
whom many Americans disliked to the point of
considering him illegitimate. The author was Karl
Rove. (Yeah, remember Turd Blossom?) The bland
headline: “The gop Targets State Legislatures.”
The piece dispassionately noted that while Wash-
ington was “fixated” on whether the election would
deliver a rebuke to President Barack Obama, the
most significant votes were being cast way down
the ballot. That was because 2010 was a census year,
meaning that over the following two years, legisla-
tures in dozens of states would redraw electoral dis-
tricts. If Republicans could pick off just 107 legislative
seats in key states, they would be able to deny Dem-
ocrats a majority in the House for a decade to come.
Consider Texas, Rove went on: “Democrats had a
17-13 edge in the state’s congressional delegation after
the 2000 elections. Republicans won control of the
Texas House in 2002 and redrew the state’s congres-
sional map. As a result, the gop now controls 20 con-
gressional seats in Texas while Democrats control 12.”
(Rove was being coy: That redistricting was a signa-
ture endeavor of a Texas ally, former House Majority
Leader Tom DeLay, financed with boatloads of dark
money to create a Republican “permanent majority.”)
The strategy worked. Republicans—buoyed by
the tea party and Rove-ified campaigns staked on
racial and cultural dog whistles—took over state-
houses and redrew the maps. And before long, states
where a majority of voters had chosen Democrats
nonetheless ended up with mostly gop lawmakers.
(In 2012, Republican candidates in Wisconsin gar-
nered less than 49 percent of the vote but won 61
percent of seats in the state Assembly.)

This is how you hack elections when you can’t
persuade enough voters to actually choose your
ideas. It may be legal (and has been practiced, at
some point or another, by both parties), but it’s also
a perversion of the core tenets of democracy.
We’re living in Rove’s world now—a world where
a majority of voters have chosen one party but the
other party governs. It’s because of the district
lines that Rove’s compatriots drew that President
Donald Trump has no counterweight in Congress.
And it’s this mercenary approach—if you can’t win
on the merits, hack the system—that we now see
playing out across the board.
This is the spirit behind the mendacious, manip-
ulative messages Trump’s campaign and its allies at
Cambridge Analytica served up to Facebook users.
It’s the spirit behind the National Rifle Association’s
decision to go all in on anger and fear while coddling
the Kremlin. And it’s the driving impulse behind the
White House’s push to hack another vital piece of
democratic infrastructure: the census.
On that last issue, as Ari Berman shows in this
magazine, nearly every decision the administration
and its allies in Congress have made has served a
single goal: a tally that inflates the share of white
people in the population and undercounts com-
munities of color. A whiter census will skew the
allocation of congressional seats and even affect
the makeup of Electoral College votes (which are
divvied up via the same population math). It will
also shift trillions in federal funding. Make America
White Again, you might say—a last-ditch effort to
deny the nation’s true diversity and vigor.
Which takes us back to Karl Rove. Eight years
ago—it feels more like 80—it was hard to tell ex-
actly how far the hacking of our democracy would
go. We didn’t know that a demagogue would show
up prepared to cozy up to Nazis and Klansmen and
make common cause with a foreign adversary. We
didn’t know that a major US company would bury
evidence that its users’ data was stolen and used
to manipulate voting. We didn’t know that anti-
democratic redistricting would give us a Congress
unwilling to exercise the most basic oversight.
But we do now. And we also know there are a lot
more dots to connect, more rocks to turn over. That’s
what we do here at Mother Jones. You can see it in this
issue—from Ari’s census story and Andy Kroll’s deep
dive on Cambridge Analytica to our timeline on the
nra-Russia dalliance and our investigation of how
much further Russian attacks could go.
We can do this because support from our readers
(especially folks like you holding this magazine who
subscribe or donate) gives us independence from
advertisers and platform behemoths (including,
yes, Facebook). And that’s never been more im-
portant. Thank you. Q

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
CLARA JEFFERY

CEO
MONIKA BAUERLEIN

Free download pdf