New Zealand Listener - May 26, 2018

(Jeff_L) #1

MAY 26 2018 LISTENER


W


omen’s sport took
another step forward
when New Zealand Foot-
ball reached an agreement with
the New Zealand Professional
Footballers’ Association that
includes pay parity, equal prize
money, equal rights for image
use and the same travel arrange-
ments for men’s and women’s
national teams. New Zealand
Cricket followed suit, announc-
ing that henceforth the White
Ferns will travel in business class
on long-haul lights.
It will be interesting to see
what equal prize money means
in practice. The deal is 40% of
prize money won. The prize
money on ofer at the last men’s
World Cup was $820 million;
at the last women’s World Cup
it was $21 million, although
that igure is likely to increase
dramatically given the surging
popularity of women’s football.
On the other hand, the Football
Ferns are ranked 20th in the
world, the All Whites 133rd. It’s
not just a matter of the size of
the pie; it’s also where you are in
the queue.

Women


at work


Women’s football


outshines the


men’s game.


GETTY IMAGES

T


he Hurricanes could have argued that the
27-year-old will have plenty of time to devote
to the English cause in years to come, but his

primary focus for the immediate future should be


on leading the Wellington-based franchise’s cam-


paign for a second Super Rugby title. (It would be


interesting to observe the reaction if Shields were


to be injured while on England duty and miss the


Super Rugby play-offs.)


But that was never going to happen either,


partly because in Canes country, Shields is highly


regarded – coach Chris Boyd went all in with “the


sort of person you’d be really keen for your daugh-


ter to marry” – and seen to have had a raw deal


from the All Blacks selectors.


This matter should – but almost certainly won’t



  • initiate a discussion over whether it’s fair and


reasonable for one country to invest time and


money in developing a player who can, at the


drop of a hat, switch allegiance to another country


without the first one receiving finan-
cial compensation or a transfer fee.
What makes it particularly pertinent
in this instance is that the beneficiary,
England, has more than 2 million
homegrown rugby players; New
Zealand has fewer than 200,000. The
England men’s team is selected from
a pool of senior players that exceeds
ours by more than 100,000.
The Shields affair suggests the
Northern Hemisphere’s commitment
to preserving international rugby’s
integrity and status is diminishing.
Europe’s private-ownership system set
up an undeclared struggle between
club owners and national unions
for control of the game. The owners
would like rugby to adopt the football
model in which the game’s shop
window is the annual club
competitions, featuring
the best players from
around the world, and the
international component
is reduced to quadrennial
World and European Cup
tournaments.
Former England
halfback Austin Healey
suggested coach Eddie
Jones will soon pick an
England XV with “more
players born outside the
country than in it ... A
few years ago I would’ve
been uncomfort-
able with that prospect.
Now I just want Jones
to pick the best team he can.”
If it no longer matters where a
national team’s players come from,
then international
rugby is becoming a de
facto franchise competi-
tion. No doubt rugby
will continue to pretend
otherwise and merce-
naries will continue
to impersonate Easter
Island statues during the
national anthems.
And it won’t be
long before we hear
a young athlete
declare that his or her
dream is to represent
a country, as opposed
to their country. l

Plenty to celebrate:
the Football Ferns
at the Rio Olympics.

In Canes country,


Shields is seen to


have had a raw


deal from the All


Blacks selectors.

Free download pdf