The contents of these Aramaic texts suggest that some might have a pre-
Maccabean origin in priestly-Levitical circles who had knowledge of
Mesopotamian lore and science. They were influenced by Persian ideas and
emphasize revelation through dreams and visions, as well as the transmis-
sion of ancestral traditions above or alongside the interpretation of the
Scriptures. Though some of these Aramaic texts include interpretative or
paraphrastic sections, the main link is with the ancestral “scriptural” figure,
not with the scriptural text.
The Hebrew examples of new writings attributed or connected to Mo-
ses, Jeremiah, and David belong to a somewhat different category than the
Aramaic examples. The former may be seen as foundational figures ac-
cording to the functions ascribed to them in the Scriptures. All the new
texts attributed to Moses belong to a Mosaic discourse in which specific
interpretations of the Law were regarded as divine revelation to Moses on
Sinai. Likewise, theApocryphon of Jeremiah Cis based on the image of Jere-
miah being the leader and teacher of the nation after the destruction of the
Temple.
Most of these texts have in common that their ascription to ancestral
patriarchs or foundational figures may be seen as an expansion of Scrip-
ture, although only in some cases is there evidence that they achieved
scriptural status in some circles. This goes for the Enochic writings, theAr-
amaic Levi Document,and perhaps theApocryphon of Jeremiah C,if
2 Macc. 2:1-4 is connected to that text.
More importantly, the Dead Sea Scrolls call for a more sophisticated
approach toward the phenomenon of pseudepigraphy, which ranges from
no more than a purely literary device in some texts (like theGenesis
Apocryphon) to attribution of one’s traditions to ancestral figures to an
authority-conferring strategy of presenting one’s new interpretation of au-
thoritative Scripture.
Expounding Scripture in Commentaries and Pesharim
Whereas rewritten texts and paraphrases are implicitly interpretative, a
special category of texts makes an explicit distinction between scripture
and commentary. The clearest examples are the so-called continuous
pesharim, such as theHabakkuk Pesher(see fig. 43) andNahum Pesherand
the pesharim on Isaiah, some Minor Prophets, and some of the Psalms.
They feature a quotation of one or more verses from a “prophetic” Scrip-
214
eibert tigchelaar
EERDMANS -- Early Judaism (Collins and Harlow) final text
Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:04:03 PM