Paul and Pseudepigraphy (Pauline Studies, Book 8)

(Kiana) #1

a deutero-pauline mystery? 191


gospel.41 in romans “gospel” is not used in this technical way at all but


in 16:25–26 “mystery” is the object of γνωρίζω.42 in 1 Cor 1:23 “Christ cru-


cified” is used in this technical way and in 2 Cor 4:5 it is Jesus Christ as


lord (cf. 2 Cor 11:4; Col 2:6). Phil 1:15 refers to someone preaching Christ.


in gal 3:23 “faith” is probably used as a circumlocution for “gospel” and


in Phil 1:14 the technical term for the content of Paul’s preaching is λόγος


(cf. 1 thess 1:6, 8; 2:13; 2 tim 4:2). apparently, “the grace of god” can be


used similarly (2 Cor 6:1; Col 1:6). this is ample evidence that, through-


out the Pauline corpus, there are a number of terms Paul finds pertinent


to denote the content of his preaching. there is also a certain laxity in


the use of the term in ephesians. it has not become a term with a fixed


meaning. it is, therefore, unwarranted to find evidence for a post-Pauline


development in the employment of “mystery” as a technical term for the


gospel in ephesians.


The Picture of the Apostles


ephesians also shows evidence of a different picture of the apostles, and


these differences are even more striking than the differences directly


related to ecclesiology. Both 1 Corinthians and ephesians attest to the idea


of the church as the temple (1 Cor 3:16–17; 6:16; eph 2:21). Both 1 Corin-


thians and ephesians use this idea to emphasize the unity of the church


and its ministers. in 1 Corinthians, however, Christ alone is the founda-


tion of the building (3:11), whereas ephesians refers to the apostles and


prophets as the foundation as well (eph 2:20). Many scholars find here


a reflection of a later stage in church history, a time when the apostles


were a phenomenon of the past.43 this difference goes back to the dif-


ferent perspective of the two passages. in 1 Corinthians 3, the point is


41 wolter, “Verborgene weisheit,” 304; wolfgang schrage, Der erste Brief an die Korinther
(eKK 7/1; neukirchen-Vluyn: neukirchener Verlag, 1991), 1:240; helmut Merklein, Der Erste
Brief an die Korinther: Kapitel 1–4 (ÖtK 7/1; gütersloh: gerd Mohn, 1992), 224; raymond F.
Collins, First Corinthians (sP 7; Collegeville, Mn: liturgical, 1999), 123. the reading “mys-
tery” is unlikely to be original in 1 Cor 2:1 (grindheim, “wisdom,” 695). if it were, however,
it would be an even clearer example of an identification of the term “mystery” with the
gospel.
42 the weight of this observation depends on one’s view of the integrity of the ending
of romans. this question falls outside the scope of this essay.
43 lincoln, Ephesians, 791; Pokorný, Epheser, 134–35; gese, Das Vermächtnis, 200;
Muddiman, Ephesians, 154; Mayer, Einheit, 32; sellin, Epheser, 236. similarly, Collins, who
also finds that the apostle Paul himself is given a superior role compared to the role he
claims for himself in the undisputed letters (Letters, 166–69; but cf. below). sellin con-
cludes that, in ephesians, Paul himself has become part of the mystery that is proclaimed
(Epheser, 248).

Free download pdf