24 United States TheEconomistMay21st 2022
Activists employ two broad justifica
tions for such moves. One is an accounting
argument: that they have positive fiscal
multipliers that improve economic out
put. The maths is debatable, given that
states must forgo federal dollars when
funding these expansions. As yet, the
amounts involved also appear relatively
small for rich states: the ongoing annual
cost of a full Medicaid expansion to undoc
umented immigrants in California is esti
mated to be $2.4bn. A bill under consider
ation to create California’s version of a per
manent excluded workers fund would cost
an extra $600m a year. Together, that is just
1.4% of the $213bn in generalfund spend
ing that Mr Newsom has just proposed.
The more compelling justification is
moral. Advocates emphasise that undocu
mented immigrants make up a dispropor
tionate share of essential workers, and that
twothirds have lived in America for more
than a decade. “I think as New Yorkers, we
need to do everything we can to create par
ity for our communities, no matter their
status,” says Jessica GonzálezRojas, a
Democratic member of the state Assembly
from Queens, New York. “They pay into the
system...so they’re quite deserving of this.”
The trajectory remains towards expan
sion of benefits. In Albany, Ms González
Rojas has been agitating for legislation that
would qualify undocumented New Yorkers
for governmentsponsored health insur
ance for the poor, the elderly and those of
working age. This year, much of that agen
da has stalled “largely because of the po
tential political ramifications in our elec
tion year” and “the relentless attacks by Re
publicans on how we’re spending our tax
money”. She calls the exclusion this year of
undocumented children from a pro
gramme to expand childcare subsidies
“just cruel”.
Asked whether or not she worries that
the state’s generosity may function as a
magnet for more undocumented immi
grants, Ms GonzálezRojas is unperturbed:
“I welcome undocumented communities.
I know they fuel our economy, they make
our neighbourhoods richer and more vi
brant and are people I love. It wouldn’t
bother me to have folks come here because
it’s an exciting place to be, and as long as
the services are provided, I think we’ll have
a very vibrant economy.”
Within the Democratic caucus, dis
agreement is hard to discern. Most home
grown criticism comes from Republicans
who are in the minority. “In a state like
New York—or any state—we cannot confer
citizenship. That is exclusively the role of
the federal government. But we can confer
de facto citizenship when you provide un
employment benefits, you provide identi
fication, drivers’ licences, you provide ac
cess to free or statefunded health care and
education,” says Rob Ortt, the Republican
leaderoftheNewYorkSenate,whoargues
thattheissuemayhelphispartyelectoral
lyinmoreconservativepartsofthestate.
“AlotofNewYorkersaregoing:‘OK,well
whataboutme?I’mnotondrugs;I haven’t
brokenthelaw;I’mnothereillegally.AllI
trytodoispaymyexorbitanttaxes.’”
Blueforbenefits,redforrage
Thesestateexperimentsfacepracticalpro
blems. Once built up, government pro
grammesarenoteasilydismantled.Inre
cessions,thepledgedobligationstonon
citizensmayseemhardertojustifytovot
ers.Andalthougha pollin 2021 foundthat
a majority of Californians supported
healthcare expansions for the undocu
mented,a majorityofAmericansdonot.
Theprogrammesmaybecomea potentat
tacklineina RepublicanPartywhichhas
previously done wellby criticising pro
gressivesforwishingtoabolishthefederal
immigrationenforcement agency. New
YorkCity’svotingproposalhasattracted
criticisminRepublicanprimaries asfar
afieldasGeorgia,fuellingrightwingire.
The more seriousproblems are else
where,though.DemocraticandRepubli
canAmericaarefastsplintering.Thatis
trueonmattersofabortion,electoralle
gitimacyandimmigration.InRepublican
dominatedTexasthegovernor,GregAb
bott,isfantasisingthata conservativeSu
premeCourtwilloverturntheprecedentof
Plylerv Doe, meaningthathisstatewould
nolongerhavetopaythepubliceducation
costsofundocumentedchildren.Heisal
sogatheringunlawfulmigrantsarrested
onthestate’ssouthernborderandsending
thembythebusloadtoWashington,asa
signofdefiance to PresidentJoe Biden.
Thesedivergentimmigrationregimesare
emergingbecausetheillegalimmigration
questionhassolittlechanceofbeingre
solvedfederally.Theauthorityofthefeder
algovernmenttosetthecountry’simmi
grationpolicyisdwindlingasa result.
Statesaresupposedtofunctionaslab
oratoriesofdemocracy.Todaytheycom
monlyactaslaboratoriesofdisunity.n
Home-grown horror
United States
Sources:GlobalTerrorismDatabase;PewResearchCentre *Notsurveyed in 2020
75
50
25
0
2000 05 10 15 19
Terroristattackswithincountry
Bymotive
Whitesupremacist Other
orxenophobic
100
75
50
25
0
2119182017
Share saying gun laws should be:
% responding*
Morestrict
About
thesame
Less strict
Domesticterrorism
Sickening theory and lethal practice
B UFFALO
A conspiracy theory that was once on the fringe leads to another mass shooting
“H
e was areally great guy,” says Dayna
OvertonBurns, of her friend Aaron
Salter, who was shot dead at Tops, the su
permarket on Jefferson Avenue in Buffalo
where he worked as a security guard. “You
can talk with him about anything,” she re
counted tearfully. Mr Salter, a retired po
liceman, tried to stop Payton Gendron, the
18yearold gunman. But Salter’s gun was
useless against the assailant’s bulletproof
vest. Mr Gendron, who livestreamed the
horror on Twitch, a gaming site, killed ten
people and injured three more. Eleven of
his victims were AfricanAmerican. All
“because of the colour of our skin”, says Ms
OvertonBurns.
From a 180page manifesto that the
white shooter allegedly wrote, and hun
dreds of messages he apparently posted
online, it is clear he targeted the supermar
ket because it was in a mainly African
American neighbourhood in New York
state’s secondbiggest city. He planned the
assault for months, driving the 200 miles
(320km) from his small town near New
York’s border with Pennsylvania, on recon