Asia Looks Seaward

(ff) #1

  1. Peter Kien-Hong Yu, ‘‘Setting Up International (Adversary) Regimes in the South
    China Sea: Analyzing the Obstacles from a Chinese Perspective,’’Ocean Development and
    International Law38 (2007): 147–56.

  2. Mark J. Valencia, Jon M. Van Dyke, and Noel A. Ludwig,Sharing the Resources of the
    South China Sea(Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1997).

  3. David C. Kang, ‘‘Hierarchy, Balancing and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International
    Relations,’’International Security28, no. 3 (2003/04): 165–80; Yuen Foong Khong, ‘‘Coping
    with Strategic Uncertainty: The Role of Institutions and Soft Balancing in Southeast Asia’s
    Post–Cold War Strategy,’’ inRethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power and Efficiency,
    ed. J.J. Suh, Peter Katzenstein, and Allen Carlson (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
    2004); Amitav Acharya and See Seng Tan, ‘‘Betwixt Balance and Community: America,
    ASEAN, and the Security of Southeast Asia,’’International Relations of the Asia Pacific6, no.
    1 (2006): 37–59.

  4. Stephen Brooks and William Wohlforth, ‘‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing,’’
    International Security30, no. 1 (2005): 72–108.

  5. Ian James Storey, ‘‘Creeping Assertiveness: China, the Philippines and the South China
    Sea Dispute,’’Contemporary Southeast Asia21, no. 1 (1999): 95–118.

  6. Michael Doyle,Ways of War and Peace(New York: Norton, 1997).

  7. Richard N. Rosecrance,The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming
    Century(New York: Basic Books, 1999).

  8. Thomas Friedman,The Lexus and the Olive Tree(New York: Anchor, 2000), 253.

  9. David M. Rowe, ‘‘The Tragedy of Liberalism: How Globalization Caused the First
    World War,’’Security Studies14, no. 3 (2005): 407–47.

  10. Alex Liebman, ‘‘Trickle-down Hegemony? China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ and Dam-building
    on the Mekong,’’Contemporary Southeast Asia27, no. 2 (2005): 281–305.

  11. John Ravenhill, ‘‘Is China an Economic Threat to Southeast Asia?’’Asian Survey46,
    no. 5 (September–October 2006): 653–74. Ravenhill finds the picture on FDI quite
    mixed.

  12. See Aaron Friedberg’s ‘‘The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?’’
    International Security30, no. 2 (2005): 7–45. See also U.S. Department of Defense,The Mili-
    tary Power of the People’s Republic of China 2005(Washington, DC: Government Printing
    Office, 2005).
    35.Jane’s Defence Weekly,April 25, 2007;Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment—China and
    Northeast Asia,March 22, 2007 (accessed April 25, 2007). PRC defense expenditures remain
    at approximately 1.5 percent of GDP.
    36.Jane’s Defence Weekly,April 25, 2007;Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment—China and
    Northeast Asia,March 22, 2007 (accessed April 25, 2007); ‘‘PLA Navy Facilities,’’ Federation
    of American Scientists Web site, http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/plan/index.html
    (accessed April 25, 2007).

  13. Timothy Hu, ‘‘China—Marching Forward,’’Jane’s Defence Weekly,April 18, 2007.

  14. David Shambaugh, ‘‘China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,’’
    International Security29, no. 3 (2005): 64–99, 86.

  15. Yu, ‘‘Chinese (Broken) U-Shaped Line,’’ 405–31.

  16. Michael Leifer, ‘‘ASEAN as a Model of a Security Community?’’ inASEAN in a
    Changed Regional and International Political Economy,ed. Hadi Soesastro (Jakarta: Centre for
    Strategic and International Studies, 1995), 141, in Emmers, ‘‘Maritime Disputes in the South
    China Sea,’’ 9.


Notes 211
Free download pdf