The Economist - USA (2019-09-28)

(Antfer) #1

66 Finance & economics The EconomistSeptember 28th 2019


2 crisis lows, and pay is growing at its fastest
pace in a decade. But on September 23rd
Mario Draghi, the head of the ecb, told
members of the European Parliament that
the longer the manufacturing slowdown
continued, the more likely that the rest of
the economy would follow. Analysts at
Capital Economics, a consultancy, recently
said that services such as technical support
and logistics that are exposed to manufac-
turing are already decelerating.
The ecb’s decision on September 12th to
launch a package of easing measures, in-
cluding cutting interest rates and restart-
ing asset purchases, might thus seem well-
timed. But since then the heads of several
national central banks, including France’s
and Germany’s, have said that restarting
bond-buying is unnecessary. Klaas Knot,
the head of the Dutch central bank, went as
far as releasing a statement describing the
ecb’s stimulus package as “disproportion-
ate”. Mr Draghi fretted to eu parliamentari-
ans that outspoken dissent risked under-
mining the bank’s pledges to keep interest
rates low and to continue with asset pur-
chases until it achieved its inflation target.
On September 25th Sabine Lautenschläger,
a member of the bank’s executive board, re-
signed unexpectedly, even though her term
expires only in 2022. She gave no reason for
her decision, but is known to have opposed
restarting asset purchases.
It is thus even more important for na-
tional governments to heed the ecb’s oft-
repeated pleas, and do more to counter the
slowdown with fiscal stimulus. That gov-
ernment-bond yields in many countries
are sub-zero bolsters the case. On Septem-
ber 17th the Netherlands took a tentative
step in that direction, announcing tax cuts
amounting to €3bn ($3.3bn, or 0.3% of
gdp), and promising to publish plans next
year for a public-investment fund. Ger-
many pledged spending measures to cut
carbon emissions (see Europe section),
though these are fiscally neutral. It will
take even more dreadful data releases for
Europe’s politicians to stop trying to bal-
ance the books at the expense of growth. 7

Reverse gear^2

Source: Eurostat

Germany, industrial production
January 2017=100

2017 18 19

80

85

90

95

100

105

110
To t a l

Motor vehicles T


echnology has robbed stock ex-
changes of their theatrics. Opening
days are an exception. Blue-chip firms list-
ing on Nasdaq, America’s second-biggest
exchange, get an hour of exclusive adver-
tising on its tower in Times Square. On the
New York Stock Exchange (nyse), the big-
gest, they earn the right to be deafened by a
bell above a 116-year-old trading floor.
Yet behind the pageant, competition for
listings is cut-throat. Last year Nasdaq
snatched 18 listings from nyse; six went the
other way. Now Investors Exchange (iex),
an independent upstart created in 2012, is
giving up the fight. On September 23rd it
said it would shut its listings unit to focus
on trading and new services. “We’ve spent
many, many, many hours flying around the
world trying to educate companies,” says
Brad Katsuyama, its boss. “The return on
our efforts was not where it needed to be.”
Under America’s equity-exchange duo-
poly, Mr Katsuyama argues, retail investors
pay too much for data and a fast connec-
tion, and are outpaced by high-speed trad-
ers’ algorithms (Cboe, the third-largest, fo-
cuses on exchange-traded funds). iex’s
fees, he says, are fair and simple by com-
parison. It also routes orders over a “speed
bump”, a coil of fibre-optic cable that slows
access to the market by 350 microseconds.
Listings were not originally part of its
plans. All exchanges can trade any stock,

wherever it is listed; indeed few do listings
at all. But “Flash Boys”, a bestseller on high-
frequency trading published in 2014, cast
Mr Katsuyama and iex as champions of or-
dinary investors against rigged markets.
The publicity piqued companies’ interest.
Listings can be lucrative: Nasdaq earned
$290m in listings fees last year. And win-
ning listings from the giants would have
been a pleasing endorsement.
Yet after 18 months iex had secured just
one: Interactive Brokers, an electronic bro-
kerage that switched from Nasdaq last Oc-
tober (this week it said it would go back).
Market participants say iex may have been
held back by its relatively low trading vol-
umes (see chart). Exchanges determine the
opening and closing prices of stocks they
list; more bids should mean more accurate,
less volatile quotes. Price discovery seems
to have mattered more to prospective list-
ers than iex’s modest fees and champion-
ing of the little guy.
Despite the failed listings experiment,
iex is still making inroads. Though small
compared with Nasdaq and nyse, it trades
6,000-7,000 stocks and exchange-traded
funds each day, making it the world’s sev-
enth-largest exchange operator by trading
value. It has plans for new business lines,
such as iex Cloud, which offers data to soft-
ware developers, and iex Astral, a data plat-
form built with fund managers. It is rolling
out iex Signal, machine-learning software
that predicts short-term price movements
to help companies time stock buy-backs.
And iex has helped focus attention on
its pet issues. Supported by large asset
managers, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, America’s main financial
regulator, is waging court battles against
nyse and Nasdaq over data and transaction
fees. Other newcomers, such as the Long-
Term Stock Exchange and Members Ex-
change, are also gearing up to trade equi-
ties. Meanwhile, iex’s main innovation is
being copied. By 2020 a dozen markets,
from Toronto to Moscow, plan to use some
sort of speed bump. Enough, perhaps, to
ring alarm bells in Times Square. 7

An iconoclastic stock exchange loses a
battle—but not yet the war

American stock exchanges

Flash boys in the


pan


Fighting another day

Source:Cboe

US equities trading market share
Five-day average to September 25th 2019, %
0 10203040
Off exchange

NYSE

Nasdaq

Cboe

IEX
Free download pdf