The Sunday Times May 22, 2022 25
COMMENT
My bus fan’s holiday
among puzzled monks
Football fans in East Sussex,
where I’ve just moved, are
used to this kind of abuse,
thanks to Brighton and Hove
Albion’s location on
Britain’s gayest riviera.
I am an Arsenal fan, but
I’m off to see the Seagulls
because I can take the No 12
bus, which runs between
Brighton and Eastbourne
with such frequency,
convenience and panache
that I was moved to describe
it on Twitter as the best bus
in the world. A row broke
out with those advocating
other services, in Cumbria,
Cornwall and the Hindu
Kush. All excellent, I am
sure, but only the No 12
stops at the end of my road
and takes me to Brighton, so
it is an easy win. Also, it has
cheerful drivers, free wi-fi
and — best of all — the most
wonderful view as it reaches
the edge of the South Downs
and plunges towards
Eastbourne, fringing the
sparkling grey seas of the
Channel like Biarritz in
faded pomp.
The local TV news picked
up the contretemps and did
a report in which they
interviewed passengers
extolling the route. I had to
film myself on my phone,
for I had gone on retreat to a
monastery in Yorkshire. I
hid in some bushes to
record my contribution, lest
I spoil the cloistered silence.
someone unscarred in this
fight tell you there is nothing
to see here when a pro
footballer comes out. In an
ideal world the sexual
orientation of strikers
would be no more
noteworthy than their
sandwich preferences, but
that ideal world is still some
way off: check the hostile
reaction if you doubt it.
Will Daniels risk abuse or
mockery from fans not
comfortably compliant with
the diversity standards their
clubs profess? “Shout what
you want,” he says. “It’s not
going to make a difference.”
I had heard rumours that a
professional footballer was
about to come out, but it was
still a surprise to see the
interview with Jake Daniels.
The 17-year-old Blackpool
striker was the first active
player to come out since
Justin Fashanu revealed his
sexuality in the 1990s, at the
cost of his career, his prestige
and his wellbeing.
The response to Daniels
was different. League clubs
everywhere tweeted their
support; the captain of
England, the prime minister
and the Duke of Cambridge
tweeted their support.
Though not completely
different. Some responded
with extraordinary hostility
on social media, and I
re-posted one particularly
horrible example.
Those of us who have been
on the receiving end of that
kind of abuse shrugged our
shoulders, but the response
from some straight people
who would think themselves
on the right side of this
argument was striking. “Why
go on about this?” one said.
“What difference does
sexuality make to a footballer,
or to anyone?”
It is quite difficult to have
Please don’t argue: that lad is the
bravest man in football and beyond
lI was revisiting the
monastery where I trained
for the priesthood. A chunk
of me never really left it, so I
go back when I can to see
the monks and to reconnect
to the pattern of life, which
is organised entirely round
prayer: first thing, in the
middle of the day, in the
evening and before bed.
Prayer must seem terribly
quaint or inconsequential if
you don’t practise it, but for
those of us who do it all the
time it is a demanding
discipline with rich
rewards. I don’t mean by
making two plus two equal
five or helping you win the
lottery, but by revealing the
fullness of life for which we
are intended.
It is a this-world rather
than other-world
experience, as was
reaffirmed by Ruby Wax,
whom I took with me,
fulfilling a promise I made
when I interviewed her for
The Sunday Times Magazine
last year. She managed to
lock herself out before
compline and then got stuck
in a window while gamely
trying to break in without
disturbing anyone,
delighting the brethren and
inspiring a dozen sermons.
Boris in
wonderland
It is politics that looks other-
world to me now, not prayer.
Ministers solemnly
admonishing the EU for
prioritising the interests of its
members over those of non-
members, for expecting the
UK to stick to agreements the
UK negotiated, is pure Alice’s
Adventures in Wonderland.
Or maybe that does a
disservice to children’s
literature. It is the
childishness of what passes
for government that makes
our politics feel so unreal. I
watched the Queen’s Speech
— with a special chair for a
special hat next to the heir to
the throne looking like a
postmaster from a vassal
state of the Astro-Hungarian
empire — but it was the
content, not the delivery, that
was unpersuasive, a
smorgasbord of empty
calories. God help us.
NEWMAN’S
VIEW
Richard Coles
Week ending
It’s all so horribly familiar — Heard and Vardy
are the unwitting victims of witch trials
Camilla Long
Kudos, I suppose, to the
woman at the Cannes film
festival for ripping off her
dress and screaming “Stop
raping us!” on the red carpet.
For a moment you could
see the other guests
wondering: did she mean
Harvey, or Roman, or pretty
much any French film
director 1950-2005?
It turned out she meant
Russian war crimes: stop
raping women and children
in Ukraine. It is true this is an
outrage — but what can stars
like Idris Elba do about it?
Wars aren’t caused by
Elba, Tilda Swinton or anyone
else at the premiere of Three
Thousand Years of Longing.
They’re caused by people like
Vladimir Putin and
superpowers winding each
other up. The people who
need to be made to feel
uncomfortable are
politicians, not actors and
actresses, who probably
have a Ukraine flag in their
Insta bio already.
I bet the first thing anyone
at that premiere thought
was, “Why didn’t I think of
wearing only mum knickers
and paint smeared over my
nude breasts?” Especially the
perennially in-the-knack
prawn-fancier Swinton.
I’m not even sure of the
value of getting one’s boobs
out as a form of protest
anyway. It always gets
headlines, sure. But isn’t it
top of the most-read lists
because people simply want
a cop of some naked Slav
boob, not to read about war
crimes in Kharkiv?
The yellow and
blue boobs had
Cannes green
H with envy
alfway through the Wagatha
Christie trial, I found myself
wondering, just what does
Rebekah Vardy get out of this?
Maybe she thinks she’s on
some vague “my body, my
bump”-style OK! magazine
crusade for truth and justice,
but after seven whole days of being
screamed at as a slut and a scheming liar,
it’s not really been worth it, has it?
Every single question from Coleen
Rooney’s barrister seemed gleefully
engineered to paint her as a gossiping,
deceitful, lazy wannabe. No one will
ever forget his first slut-shaming zinger:
why did she call Peter Andre’s penis a
“chipolata”? Just as Amber Heard is now
never not Amber Turd, Vardy is for ever
the “chipolata” shagger. It doesn’t
matter what the judge finds now — the
public have found against Vardy.
Over in America last week, as it
happened, Heard was also in the
witness box, similarly puffy and tearful,
and encased in a kind of felty Dr Evil
court suit.
It was the same thing: a harassed,
bewildered woman with struggling
updo/inadvisable plait offers up her
version of the truth, believing, stupidly,
that she is the victim, only to find out
that she is actually the witch in this and,
really, the person on trial.
Because make no mistake about what
we are seeing: these are witch trials,
complete with screaming crowds of
medieval misogynists and poisonous
hallmark of favouring the safe, the
powerful and the rich, no matter what
the evidence.
I have no time for Vardy, a woman
whose life is careless and petty (“I bet
because you had that cervical cancer
chat in The Sun she has unfollowed
you”), but why is it that people feel so
much safer rooting for the finger-
wagging Goody Rooney when, arguably,
Rooney has behaved far more
aggressively by screaming to millions of
people that Vardy is a “grass”? Not a
huge crime, as it happens, unless you
are a mafia don.
Scan any crevice of the internet and
you will see women also supporting the
wifebeater Depp, calling Heard a liar,
circulating videos of her being attacked
by Depp’s lawyers and supposedly
pausing to be photographed while
tearfully blowing her nose.
Again, I am no fan of this hammy
actress and global wind-up — she claims
Depp tanked her career, as if she needed
help in doing this — but if Depp shows
any hint of milking this trial as much as it
is said Heard is, it is seen as simply
amusing and diverting and part of his
meme-able charm.
Take, for example, the business of his
flirting — the actor has been upstaging
everyone by pawing, hugging, stroking
and giggling with his lawyer, Camille
Vasquez, in an apparent attempt to
create the illusion they are having an
affair. One body language expert
whinnied that their lingering goodbyes
were “a ritual reminiscent of DiCaprio’s
drift away from Winslet’s raft in the
closing scenes of Titanic”. Depp, many
gushing articles have concluded, has
turned on his dubious “Southern
gentleman” for her, pulling out chairs
and helping her with her phone charger.
This, in a trial for domestic abuse, of all
things — does anyone remember how
the “Southern gentleman” act ends?
Heard found out the hard way: for this
trial, in which Depp is suing her for libel
after she said she was a victim of
domestic abuse, she gave a virtuoso
18-minute account of their worst evening
together. Shaking with tears and anxiety,
she said he had smashed her head
against a door and ripped her nightdress
off before tussling with her naked across
broken glass. She said he hit her, slapped
her and pinned to a bar, sexually
assaulting her with a broken bottle.
We already know he also threw wine
bottles and “urinated all over” a house
they were renting, scrawling angry
messages in blood with the tip of a
severed finger, including daubing a
penis on a painting.
Some of her testimony was a bit
theatrical — at one point she screamed,
“I’m looking into his eyes and I don’t see
him any more,” like some drunk
Victorian medium. But you listen to
this evidence and wonder how Vasquez
felt about laying into Heard. Is she
aware that she too is being groomed as
one of Depp’s victims, co-opted into a
greasy circus of feints and fakery and
soap opera in which she will now only
ever be known as the woman who was
Is Depp’s lawyer
aware that she
too is being
groomed as one
of his victims?
Amber Heard, encased in a kind of felty Dr Evil court suit, giving evidence last week in the libel trial brought by Johnny Depp
groped by the star in an attempt to
ginger up a jury?
These women may give the
performances of their lives, but if there
is one thing we have learnt from all this,
it is that power naturally flows back to
the richest, most famous man in the
room, whether that’s Depp or Wayne
Rooney.
Depp himself, sporting a Cuprinol
ponytail, is treating the whole thing
like a press tour for Pirates of the
Caribbean circa 2006, arriving in a huge
car full of henchpeople, reggae blasting,
drinking in the screams of the women
waiting outside the court in Fairfax
County, Virginia.
The sheer number of people he takes
with him is part of the appeal: the bag-
carriers, house-managers, drug people
and money sharks, all paid hundreds of
thousands of dollars a month to enable
him. No friends, though.
But no matter how much he is
accused of, or how appalling the
evidence, the only thing we hear is how
hilarious he can be, while Heard is only
flawed — “not the perfect victim”, as
people are saying. Well, no — isn’t the
“perfect victim” actually dead?
STEVE HELBER/AP