The Great Outdoors – July 2019

(Ben Green) #1
Going wild – at a price?
Roger Smith looks at a curious proposal to monetise ‘wild’ camping in England’s National Parks

where wild camping for one or two nights
is permitted provided it is done responsibly.
At present, strictly speaking, you need the
landowners’ permission before camping
in England and Wales, though as we all
know hundreds of people camp wild every
weekend with no problems at all.
More information gradually emerged.
The £20 fee (which might be £30 in some
cases) was per tent not per person, and
would be split 50% to the landowner,
25% to the national park and 25% for
administration. The hugely ambitious aim
was to locate 500 wild pitch sites across all
of the National Parks. This would surely
have required enormous amounts of
administration which UK Wildcamp didn’t
seem to have.
Tweets and emails flew back and
forth and then on Monday 3 June, UK
Wildcamp pulled the plug, stating: “We
are wild campers too and thought the idea
of campaigning to remove the current
restrictions would be welcome. We also
thought that running a booking scheme
for entry-level wild campers would be
understood and welcomed by the wider
group.
“We see now this is not the case. We are
going to suspend our service and have a
rethink about how we might revise it. We
won’t describe any future version of our
service as ‘wild camping’ because for many
of you that specifically means free and

WELL, THIS IS AN ODD ONE. At the
end of May we learned of the launch of a
scheme apparently aimed at encouraging
inexperienced backpackers to enjoy wild
camping in two of our national parks.
Seems fair enough? Not when you read
that it would cost you £20 a night and all
you would get for your money apparently
was a grid reference and the blessing of the
landowners as they pocketed your cash.
The Twittersphere exploded with
comments posted by outraged luminaries
from the backpacking and hillwalking
community. One senior member of the
Backpackers Club said: “I recently paid
£10 for a pitch including showers, toilets,
electric kettle and a lounge. Pay £20 for a
wild pitch – not likely.” There was much
more in the same vein, including an article
in The Guardian by Phoebe Smith in which
she said: “The benefits from wild camping
are priceless and everyone should be able to
experience [them] without being charged for
the privilege.”
The scheme was being proposed by
Will Harris, author of a slim book called
Rewilding the Humans in which he argues
the case for us all to get out and experience
nature close-up. We’d all agree with that aim,
but not the way Will was suggesting it was
done.
He had approached two National Parks,
the Lake District and the South Downs,
and asked if they could identify suitable
sites which could be used. There is some
confusion as to his relationship with the
Parks. Richard Leafe, chief executive of
the Lake District National Park Authority,
said that they were: “collaborating with UK
Wildcamp to trial a wild camping experience
on a limited number of sites” but the South
Downs NPA said: “This is a private pilot
project completely separate to the South
Downs National Park Authority. Five sites
along the South Downs Way were identified
where the landowner might allow a small
number of camping pitches.”
Many questions remained unanswered.
How would the sites be promoted? How
many tents would be allowed on each site?
What advice would be given about toileting
and general campcraft? Why was the fee
necessary?
Underlying the proposal, apparently, was
a desire to try to bring the English and Welsh
legislation in line with that in Scotland,


unplanned camping. Nor are we likely to
stray into a debate about the laws on wild
camping as we now understand that this is a
highly charged area.”
The last two sentences get to the nub of
the matter. Not enough thought was given to
this scheme before it was launched, and its
proposers failed to consult key organisations
and individuals who could have given
them invaluable advice (like ‘don’t do it’).
We are also left with the question as to why
the government agency DEFRA agreed to
provide seed funding for this proposal when
so many exceptional countryside schemes
find it impossible to get financial support.
The National Parks seem to have bene
hoodwinked to some extent, as is evident
from some rapid backtracking when the row
blew up.
What happens now? Making wild
camping legitimate in England and Wales
is a highly laudable aim but there are better
ways of going about it. I am sure all the
relevant bodies such as the Backpackers
Club, Ramblers, BMC etc would be happy to
sit down with Will Harris and his colleagues,
discuss the whole question and agree a
common approach, perhaps tying in with
the current review of National Parks. Will
ruffled some feathers with his £20-a-night
plans but I don’t believe he has done long-
term damage, and something for the greater
good might yet emerge. It was a rum do
while it lasted, though.

Photo: James Osmond

by Roger Smith


COMMENT

Wild camping in
the Lake District

28 The Great Outdoors July 2019
Free download pdf