Those oceanic islands with large proportions of
endemic plants are typically high islands with
varied habitats (Box 3.2; Humphries 1979). Recent
work, based on molecular phylogenies, supports
the more traditional biogeographical analyses
undertaken by Renvoize (1979) in indicating multi-
ple influences on particular islands, and a variety of
stepping-stone routes back and forth across the
Indian Ocean (e.g. Galley and Linder 2006; Rocha
et al. 2006).
Renvoize (1979) declined to attribute the low
islands of the Indian Ocean below the level of
Palaeotropical Kingdom because they contain too
high a proportion of very widespread species. This
restrained approach to demarcation is realistic, and
although the categorization of islands into particu-
lar biogeographical provinces or regions is clearly
problematic (Cox 2001), such phytogeographical
and zoogeographical analyses have some value.
They establish the broad biogeographical context
within which the compositional structure of a par-
ticular island or archipelago needs to be placed
(cf. van Balgooy et al. 1996).
Distance from a larger source pool can be a poor
indicator of biogeographical affinity. First, there may
be historical factors, as in the cases of Madagascar
and the granitic islands of the Seychelles, which are
ancient continental fragments from Gondwanaland
and so began their existence as islands millions of
years ago, complete, we assume, with a full
complement of species. In the case of Madagascar
the split from Africa has been estimated to have
occurred as long ago as 165 million years (Davis et al.
1994), but the effective isolation date may be
considerably more recent (see Box 2.2). Secondly,
ocean or wind currents (or even migration routes)
may have determined colonization biases (Cook and
Crisp 2005), such as apparently in the case of the
butterflies of the Antillean island of Mona
(Chapter 2). Another classic example is that of
the flora of Gough Island (Moore 1979). The
predominant wind circulation system around the
South Pole provides a plausible explanation for
the affinities with New Zealand and South America
(Fig. 3.8). Changes in relative sea level, landmass
positions, and oceanic and atmospheric circulation
over geological time (Chapter 2) can mean that
such analyses are difficult to bring to a definite
conclusion. We illustrate the problems involved in
more detail below, with reference to Macaronesia.
As already mentioned, within historical biogeog-
raphy two opposing camps have formed up over
recent decades, the dispersalist andvicariance
biogeographers, each concerned with how disjunct56 THE BIOGEOGRAPHY OF ISLAND LIFE
GloriosaAFRO-ARABIAN SUB-KINGDOMPALAEOTROPICAL KINGDOMMADAGASCAN
REGIONS.E. ASIA-MALAYAN
REGIONDECCAN-MALAYSIAN
SUB-KINGDOMSeychellesAgalegaAmirantes
CoetivyComoros Tromelin
Cargados
Carajos
Mauritius
ReunionRodriguesAdduFarquharMaldive
IslandsLaccadive
IslandsAldabra
Group Christmas
Cocos orKeeling Island
IslandArchipelagoChagosAndaman
Islands
Nicobar
AFRO-ORIENTALDOMAIN IslandsDECCAN
REGIONFigure 3.7Phytogeographical classification of the Indian Ocean islands. (Redrawn from Renvoize 1979, Fig. 1.)