Surgeons as Educators A Guide for Academic Development and Teaching Excellence

(Ben Green) #1

34


A successful curriculum is constantly developing and changing ideally based on
a 360 degree feedback process. Understanding this process by sustaining and man-
aging the strength of the curriculum, changing or realigning the weaknesses, and
promoting further improvements will result in an educational program that success-
fully meets the needs of the learners and readily engages enthusiastic participation
by faculty.


References



  1. Collins JP, Gough IR.  An academy of surgical educators: sustaining education--enhancing
    innovation and scholarship ANZ. J Dermatol Surg. 2010;80(1–2):13–7.

  2. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=curriculum.

  3. Alvior M.  The meaning and importance of curriculum development. http://simplyeducate.
    me/2014/12/13/the-meaning-and-importance-of-curriculum-development/.

  4. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step
    approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.

  5. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/MilestonesFAQ.pdf.

  6. Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess, Res
    Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8.

  7. https://www.auanet.org/education/aua-guidelines.cfm.

  8. White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, Worden MK. Why are medical stu-
    dents ‘checking out’ of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ. 2014;48(3):315–24.

  9. LaVelle BA, McLaughlin JJ.  Simulation-based education improves patient safety in ambu-
    latory care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Source advances
    in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches (Vol. 3: performance and tools).
    Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

  10. Khamis NN, Satava RM, Alnassar SA, Kern DE. A stepwise model for simulation-based cur-
    riculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach. Surg Endosc.
    2016;30:279–87.

  11. Vyasa P, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ, Gardner AK. Are general surgery residents accurate assessors
    of their own flexible endoscopy skills? J Surg Educ. 2017;74(1):23–9.

  12. Gallagher AG, Jordan-Black JA, O’Sullivan GC. Prospective, randomized assessment of the
    acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):387–93.

  13. Mitchell EL, Lee DY, Sevdalis N, Partsafas AW, Landry GJ, Liem TK, Moneta GL. Evaluation
    of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill: a randomized
    trial. Am J Surg. 2011;201(1):31–9.

  14. Ziemann U, Muellbacher W, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Modulation of practice-dependent plastic-
    ity in human motor cortex. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 6):1171–81.

  15. Kroft J, Ordon M, Po L, Zwingerman N, Lee JY, Pittini R.  Can surgical “warm-up” with
    instructor feedback improve operative performance of surgical trainees? J Minim Invasive
    Gynecol. 2015;22(6S):S17–8.

  16. Fung L, Boet S, Bould MD, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tricco A, Tavares W, Reeves S. Impact of cri-
    sis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary
    teams: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):433–44.


E.M. McDougall and B. Schwartz
Free download pdf