Surgeons as Educators A Guide for Academic Development and Teaching Excellence

481

open, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic procedures. Future advancements

will aim toward increasing realism and applicability to real-life scenarios.

References

1. Preece R. The current role of simulation in urological training. Cen Eur J Urol. 2015;68:207–11.


2. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve
   out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg : Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2008;12:213–21.


3. Aggarwal R, Darzi A.  Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med.
   2006;355:2695–6.


4. Ahmed K, Aydin A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, McCabe JE. A novel cadaveric simulation pro-
   gram in urology. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:556–65.


5. Aydin A, Shafi AM, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation and train-
   ing models in urological surgery: a systematic review. J Urol. 2016;196(2):312–20.


6. Shergill IS, Shaikh T, Arya M, Junaid I. A training model for suprapubic catheter insertion:
   the UroEmerge suprapubic catheter model. Urology. 2008;72:196–7.


7. Hossack T, Chris BB, Beer J, Thompson G. A cost-effective, easily reproducible, suprapubic
   catheter insertion simulation training model. Urology. 2013;82:955–8.


8. Singal A, Halverson A, Rooney DM, Davis LM, Kielb SJ.  A validated low-cost training
   model for suprapubic catheter insertion. Urology. 2015;85:23–6.


9. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsur-
   gery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of
   technical skill. J Urol. 2004;172:378–81.


10. Blum CA, Adams DB.  Who did the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Minim Access
    Surg. 2011;7:165–8.


11. Figert PL, Park AE, Witzke DB, Schwartz RW. Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic
    skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:533–7.


12. Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Keisu J, Dasgupta P. Face, content and con-
    struct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. BJU Int.
    2010;106:850–4.


13. da Cruz JA, Dos Reis ST, Cunha Frati RM, et al. Does warm-up training in a virtual reality
    simulator improve surgical performance? A prospective randomized analysis. J Surg Educ.
    2016;73(6):974–8.


14. Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS.  Laparoscopic surgical box model
    training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst
    Rev. 2014;(1):CD010479.


15. Pitzul KB, Grantcharov TP, Okrainec A. Validation of three virtual reality fundamentals of
    laparoscopic surgery (FLS) modules. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:349–55.


16. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL. Development
    of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 1998;175:482–7.


17. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic
    surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240:518–25; discussion 25–8


18. Keyser EJ, Derossis AM, Antoniuk M, Sigman HH, Fried GM. A simplified simulator for the
    training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:149–53.


19. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of lapa-
    roscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the
    operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199:115–20.


20. Smith R, Patel V, Satava R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic sur-
    gery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum
    development. Int J Med Robot + Comput Assist Surg : MRCAS. 2014;10:379–84.

24 Simulation in Surgery