Surgeons as Educators A Guide for Academic Development and Teaching Excellence

(Ben Green) #1
483


  1. Fernandez A, Chen E, Moore J, et al. A phantom model as a teaching modality for laparo-
    scopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26:1–5.

  2. Abdelshehid CS, Quach S, Nelson C, et al. High-fidelity simulation-based team training in
    urology: evaluation of technical and nontechnical skills of urology residents during laparo-
    scopic partial nephrectomy. J Surg Educ. 2013;70:588–95.

  3. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, McDougall EM.  Simulating laparoscopic renal hilar vessel inju-
    ries: preliminary evaluation of a novel surgical training model for residents. J Endourol.
    2012;26:393–7.

  4. Molinas CR, Binda MM, Mailova K, Koninckx PR. The rabbit nephrectomy model for train-
    ing in laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:185–90.

  5. Wijn RP, Persoon MC, Schout BM, Martens EJ, Scherpbier AJ, Hendrikx AJ.  Virtual
    reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity. J Endourol.
    2010;24:117–22.

  6. Makiyama K, Nagasaka M, Inuiya T, Takanami K, Ogata M, Kubota Y.  Development of a
    patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol : Off J Jpn Urol Assoc.
    2012;19:829–35.

  7. Makiyama K, Yamanaka H, Ueno D, et al. Validation of a patient-specific simulator for lapa-
    roscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol : Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2015;22:572–6.

  8. Poniatowski LH, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Reihsen TE, Sainfort F, Sweet RM.  Validity and
    acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyelo-
    plasty. J Endourol. 2014;28:393–8.

  9. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the
    first 100 cases. J Urol. 2002;167:1253–6.

  10. Raza SJ, Soomroo KQ, Ather MH. “Latex glove” laparoscopic pyeloplasty model: a novel
    method for simulated training. Urol J. 2011;8:283–6.

  11. Yang B, Zhang ZS, Xiao L, Wang LH, Xu CL, Sun YH. A novel training model for retroperi-
    toneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2010;24:1345–9.

  12. Ramachandran A, Kurien A, Patil P, et  al. A novel training model for laparoscopic pyelo-
    plasty using chicken crop. J Endourol. 2008;22:725–8.

  13. Jiang C, Liu M, Chen J, et al. Construct validity of the chicken crop model in the simulation
    of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2013;27:1032–6.

  14. Fu B, Zhang X, Lang B, et al. New model for training in laparoscopic dismembered uretero-
    pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2007;21:1381–5.

  15. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR.  Laparoscopic radical prostatec-
    tomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50:854–7.

  16. Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC. Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesicourethral
    running anastomosis. J Endourol. 2003;17:481–4.

  17. Yang RM, Bellman GC. Laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis: a model to assess surgical
    competency. J Endourol. 2006;20:679–82.

  18. Sabbagh R, Chatterjee S, Chawla A, Kapoor A, Matsumoto ED. Task-specific bench model
    training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:
    a randomized controlled study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3:22–30.

  19. Sabbagh R, Chatterjee S, Chawla A, Hoogenes J, Kapoor A, Matsumoto ED.  Transfer of
    laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective,
    single-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2012;187:1861–6.

  20. Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA, Van Velthoven R, Peltier A, de la Rosette
    JJ. Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prosta-
    tectomy suture. J Endourol. 2006;20:69–73.

  21. Tunitsky-Bitton E, King CR, Ridgeway B, et  al. Development and validation of a laparo-
    scopic sacrocolpopexy simulation model for surgical training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
    2014;21:612–8.

  22. Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, et al. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on
    surgical skills: a comparative study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:96–101.


24 Simulation in Surgery

Free download pdf