the systematic review, you can complete the search by searching for evidence
published during time spans not covered by the systematic review.
Making Sense of Types of Evidence
in the Literature
Evidence in the literature can be categorized in a variety of ways. Nurses find
that understanding the terms associated with these categories is helpful when
making decisions about evidence. Evidence can be categorized as: (1) primary
or secondary, (2) peer reviewed or not peer reviewed, and (3) scholarly, trade,
or popular.
Primary and Secondary Sources
Primary sources present original information by the person or people responsible
for creating it. Paintings, speeches, diary entries, autobiographies, and interviews
are some common examples. In the world of research, however, primary sources
are the journal articles, book chapters, dissertations, or conference proceed-
ings written by the people involved in the original research. Primary sources
always provide full references to other works cited within the paper. Secondary
sources are the resulting commentaries, summaries, reviews, or interpretations
of primary sources. Always written after primary sources are presented, and
often written by those not involved in the original work, secondary sources can
provide new insights or historical perspectives not previously available. Some
common secondary sources are textbooks, systematic reviews, biographies,
and general magazines. Secondary sources often do not cite the work of others.
For example, an original research paper on Internet use by patients with
diabetes was published in the scholarly journal Nursing Research. This publi-
cation of the paper is considered to be a primary source. Several weeks later,
Newsweek published a more general article about the effect of the Internet on
patient education. In this article, results from the original paper published in
Nursing Research were mentioned along with a short quote. This article consti-
tutes a secondary source about the original research conducted. Sometimes it
is important to eliminate secondary sources because of the bias inherent when
someone other than the original researcher provides the information. When
creating EBP, nurses should always read primary sources and draw their own
conclusions.
Peer-Reviewed and Refereed Sources
Research and empirical papers published as primary sources in scholarly lit-
erature undergo rigorous evaluation by experts and editors, which is known as
peer review or refereed judging. Subject significance, methods, and conclusions
KEY TERMS
primary sources:
Original information
presented by the
person or people
responsible for
creating it
secondary sources:
Commentaries,
summaries, reviews,
or interpretations
of primary sources;
often written by
those not involved
in the original work
peer review: When
experts and editors
rigorously evaluate
a manuscript
submitted for
publication
98 CHAPTER 4 Finding Sources of Evidence