participants either during or after the study, or both, and sharing the results
with them to be sure that the end product reflects what the participants said.
Transferability relates to whether the findings from one study can be trans-
ferred to a similar context. The goal of qualitative research is to understand a
particular phenomenon (Leininger, 1985) rather than generalizing to a popula-
tion as in quantitative methods. Transferability is accomplished through tech-
niques such as eliciting thick descriptions, executing adequate sampling, and
achieving data saturation. Thick descriptions involve rich, written comments
and narrative related to the situation being studied. Journals and mementos
that help to enlighten the process can be kept. Deep and detailed description
is needed to establish the scientific rigor of the study. Therefore, researchers
must maintain an audit trail that can demonstrate the researcher’s decision
making throughout the study. Adequate sampling means that the researcher
took enough time to be sure that data saturation was reached. That is, enough
subjects were interviewed so that consistent patterns and themes emerged prior
to stopping data collection. When no new information is being obtained, data
saturation is said to have been achieved.
The criterion of dependability is satisfied when the researcher has established
sufficient audit and paper trails through accurate and detailed journaling and
logs. Record keeping and reflective writing are essential in this type of research.
Other people, such as peer debriefers, should be able to look at the researcher’s
writings and see that the theory or results accurately reflect the data.
Confirmability means that the researcher made rigorous attempts to be
objective and that audit trails were kept to document the research process.
Evaluating interview questions to ensure that they are open ended and not
leading is important for ensuring confirmability. The reader must be satisfied
that the researcher has revealed that data were confirmed with the participants
through member checks. The researcher’s written records should reveal a detailed
review of the data, careful analysis and coding, and detailed logs and field notes.
KEY TERMS
persistent
observation: When
the researcher has
spent sufficient
quality time with
participants while
attempting to
describe and
capture the
essence of the
phenomenon
peer debriefing: A
technique used in
qualitative research
in which the
researcher enlists
the help of another
person, who is a
peer, to discuss the
data and findings
referential
adequacy: A
technique used
in qualitative
research in which
multiple sources of
data are compared
and the findings
hold true
Which of the three types of data collection would you use to answer each of the following
questions? How would you defend your choice of data collection method for each of these items?
Would a combination of methods be appropriate for any of the questions below? If so, why?
- What factors influence a student nurse’s decision in choosing his or her first job after
graduation? - How did Florence Nightingale choose elements to focus on when she began to formalize
nursing as a profession? - What influences whether a nurse reports a medication error to his or her supervisor?
CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE 9-1
9.1 What Is Qualitative Research? 229