combat aircraft

(Amelia) #1

TAKING A LOOK BEHIND THE HEADLINES


TAKING A LOOK BEHIND THE HEADLINES


BYBY ROBERT BECKHUSEN ROBERT BECKHUSEN


OA-X


THE NEXT PHASE


I


N MAY 2018, the US Air Force
began the second phase of its Light
Attack Experiment, also known
as OA-X, testing out turboprop
light attack aircraft at Holloman
Air Force Base, New Mexico. This
may eventually lead the  ying branch
to purchase 300 such machines for
supporting ground troops in areas
where air defenses are minimal or
non-existent.
These aircraft would not survive in a
war between great powers and  fth-
generation jets but would ply their trade
in tackling insurgencies and guerrilla
con icts in the developing world. Here,
light and maneuverable aircraft armed
with cannon, rockets and small bombs
can  y low and close to the ground
and hunt targets better than faster-
moving aircraft.
During the USAF’s  rst phase of the
experiments in 2017, it narrowed four
competing aircraft down to two: the
Textron Aviation AT-6B Wolverine and
Sierra Nevada and Embraer’s A-
Super Tucano. The second part of the

demonstration — which will last three
months — is focusing on networking,
logistics and interoperability with allied
air forces, along with working out issues
with weapons and sensors.
‘If we can get light attack aircraft
operating in permissive combat
environments, we can alleviate the
demand on our fourth- and  fth-
generation aircraft, so they can be
training for the high-end  ght they were
made for’, Lt Gen Arnie Bunch of the
USAF’s o ce for acquisition said.
The Wolverine and Super Tucano are
both good aircraft. The Wolverine is a
variant of the T-6 Texan II — used by
the USAF, the US Navy and a number
of allies for basic pilot training — with
improved datalinks, sensors, a more
powerful PT6A-68D engine and added
weapons capabilities. The Super Tucano,
with its origins in Brazil, has seen
extensive combat duties since 2006
with the Colombian Air Force targeting
the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces
of Colombia) rebel group. It’s also
experienced a great deal of combat use
in Brazilian Air Force hands.

Fighting yesterday’s war?
The OA-X program is subject to a debate
within the USAF, not only over technical
speci cs but what it will mean for the
service’s direction for the future — and
where it should anticipate future threats.
One of the criticisms most often heard is
that funds spent on a light attack aircraft
will detract from acquiring more of the
fast-moving jet  ghters and bombers
needed to successfully wage and win
a war with a near-peer adversary state
such as Russia and China, both of which

are building up advanced air defenses of
their own.
‘The success of OA-X will inherently be
limited as it was conceived to support
the US military as it was operating nine
years ago in Afghanistan’, USAF Maj Adam
Chitwood, a B-1B Lancer instructor pilot,
wrote in November 2017 for the website
War on the Rocks. ‘The world has since
moved on, and warfare with it. The threat
environment has changed, domestic
politics have changed, and the air force
has changed. The OA-X answers a simple
question of how to reduce the cost of
CAS [close air support] against an enemy
which  ghts at a lower price point than
the United States.’
Chitwood makes a good point and
quoted an un-named USAF general
who argued the service threw too many
aircraft and precision-guided Joint
Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) at so-
called Islamic State (IS) during the war
in Iraq and Syria, which was costly and
ine cient. This matches data analyzed
by the investigative journalism group

Above: The
AT-6 Wolverine
participating in
the evaluation
at Holloman in
August last year.
USAF/Ethan D.
Wagner
Right: The
A-29 is the
Wolverine’s sole
competitor as
the Light Attack
Experiment
moves into
phase two. USAF/
Christopher Okula

14 July 2018 //^ http://www.combataircraft.net


14-17 The Briefing C.indd 14 22/05/2018 17:

Free download pdf