combat aircraft

(Amelia) #1
their lives since the mission pilot, dressed
in a cumbersome full pressure suit, could
not pre- ight his aircraft and depended
on another pilot to accomplish that task,
right up to engine start. This pilot was
the back-up mission pilot and the mobile
control o cer (mobile) who not only
provided all safety checks on the ground
but also monitored the mission that could
last more than 12 hours. He also chased
the aircraft at over 100mph while giving
landing altitude and correction calls to the
pilot, hampered with restricted visibility
in the cockpit, before safely escorting the
aircraft back to the hangar.
The rest of the morning I was sequenced
through numerous ‘higher-ups’ where
my e ciency reports,  ying records and
military bearing were scrutinized. Each
wrote an evaluation that was forwarded
to my last stop — the wing commander.
I sat in silence as he read the reviews
and after what seemed an hour (but was
probably only a few minutes) we chatted
about my goals in the air force before he
o ered his blessing — pending my
medical evaluation — at taming the
U-2CT trainer. As I saluted him on
departing his o ce he stated that,

by far, the ‘Two-Headed Goat’ was the
most di cult and dangerous aircraft he
had ever  own and wished me well.
Back at the squadron I was introduced
to my acceptance  ight evaluators, ‘Snake’
and ‘PF’. ‘Snake’ was my commander in the
o cer training school’s  ight screening
program, where we nicknamed him ‘the
Steely-Eyed Killer’, while they apparently
broke the mold after ‘PF’ entered
the world!
They both gave me the rundown on
what was expected from my three  ights
in ‘the Goat’. There would be no ‘acceptable
for  rst  ight’ wishy-washy grades — every
tra c pattern and landing were to be
scored against the perfect example and
assigned either a satisfactory, marginal
or unsatisfactory grade. Interviewees
were  own in the back seat due to the
much-improved visibility when compared
to the front seat and both evaluators
would be  lling out grading cards from
the front seat and the mobile. If progress
was not evident during each  ight or the
interviewee threw in the towel, he would
 nd himself on an airliner back home the
next day. Progress — in this instance —
was to eventually acquire a feel for the

landing attitude picture and holding the
aircraft’s main landing gear at exactly 2ft
until she stalled, something extremely
aberrant to any jet pilot’s normal reactions.
Additionally, the airplane had to be
planted exactly on the centerline due to its
Boeing 737-sized wing span on the U-2R
variant and then maintained perfectly
balanced on its bicycle landing gear until
it came to a complete stop. Like most
pilots of my generation, I’d  own nothing
but tricycle-geared aircraft and therefore
never needed to execute a stall before
landing — and certainly not in a jet. This
was going to be a hard habit to break
but I was determined to do so at all costs.
With that, I was informed that a detailed
brie ng would occur the following day,
and it being 16.00hrs the squadron
bar was open.

Pilot acceptance hurdles
‘Snake’ and ‘PF’ escorted me down to the
bar and introduced me to the handful of
pilots and sta navigators present. My
reception was fairly reserved until a short
lieutenant colonel nicknamed ‘Fuzzy’
walked up to me and asked if I wanted a
beer, to which I responded that I would

http://www.combataircraft.net // July 2018 85


84-93 U-2 part 1 C.indd 85 22/05/2018 16:16

Free download pdf