build was Windsock Datafile 104
- The Taube at War, by P M Grosz,
which includes three lovely clear
photos of A.217/14, as well as 1/
scale drawings of that very aircraft.
While I didn’t take the trouble
to scale these up to 1/32, I noticed a
number of quite obvious differences
between these plans and the model:
rigging attachment points on the
wings and tailplane, rudder control
wires, and most significantly, the
shape of the front cockpit. Due to
the angles from which they were
taken, the photos of the real thing
don’t give any clues as to which
is correct, so one is left with a
dilemma, the depth of which is
down to either personal viewpoint,
or to further research. Both sources
are known for their customary
accuracy, but as the song says,
“one of them must be wrong”.
AND THE RESULT
Well, was it worth waiting for? The
answer is a loud, proud ‘”Yes!” With
no significant additions, this kit builds
into an awesome display piece. There
have been grumbles that it’s a Jeannin
Taube rather than an original Etrich
or Rumpler, but having studied the
additional rigging complications
of these alternatives, I’m happy
with what WNW have produced.
It’s big and impressive, quite unlike
anything I’ve built before, and
sets new standards of complexity
and detail in plastic moulding.
If Windsock is to be believed,
it’s not 100% accurate, but that’s
a big ”if”. I enjoyed every aspect
of the build and fear that the
stellar quality of WNW’s offerings
is slowly ruining me, as I find it
hard now to build a Great War
kit from any other producer.
“I’M HAPPY WITH WHAT WINGNUT
WINGS HAVE PRODUCED. IT’S BIG
AND IMPRESSIVE, QUITE UNLIKE
ANYTHING I’VE BUILT BEFORE”
WWW.SAMPUBLICATIONS.COM • MARCH 2018 • 13
1/
006-13-FEAT-Taube-0318.indd 13 09/02/2018 14: