Computational Systems Biology Methods and Protocols.7z

(nextflipdebug5) #1
understanding of disease mechanisms and leads to an improved
diagnosis of lung cancer. Cao et al. designed two quantitative
methods to prioritize differentially regulated genes (DRGs) and
gene pairs or links (DRLs) for gastric carcinogenesis and generated
testable hypotheses on the roles of GATA6, ESRRG, and their
signaling pathways in gastric carcinogenesis [38].

4 Conclusions


Coexpression analysis has become a very useful tool to mining the
cancer-related markers. With the accumulation of whole-genome
expression data, and the improvement of computational algo-
rithms, it is time to decipher the dysfunctional regulators and
their relevant signaling pathway through efficient differential net-
work analysis which will support the wet biological experiment and
even further promote the prevention, treatment, diagnosis, and
cure of cancer in the future. However, the above methods are all
data-driven and need to predefine a cutoff. As we know, there are
many validated networks such as protein-protein interaction net-
works, gene regulatory networks and so on, so it will be a good way
to solve the thresholding problem by integrating the existing net-
works information.

References



  1. Mitra K et al (2013) Integrative approaches for
    finding modular structure in biological net-
    works. Nat Rev Genet 14(10):719–732

  2. Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabasi AL (2011)
    Interactome networks and human disease.
    Cell 144(6):986–998

  3. Harrold JM, Ramanathan M, Mager DE
    (2013) Network-based approaches in drug dis-
    covery and early development. Clin Pharmacol
    Ther 94(6):651–658

  4. Robin X et al (2013) Personalized network-
    based treatments in oncology. Clin Pharmacol
    Ther 94(6):646–650

  5. Prieto C et al (2008) Human gene coexpres-
    sion landscape: confident network derived
    from tissue transcriptomic profiles. PLoS One
    3(12):e3911

  6. Stanley D et al (2013) Genetic architecture of
    gene expression in the chicken. BMC Geno-
    mics 14:13

  7. van Noort V, Snel B, Huynen MA (2004)
    The yeast coexpression network has a small-
    world, scale-free architecture and can be
    explained by a simple model. EMBO Rep 5(3):
    280–284
    8. Liu BH et al (2010) DCGL: an R package for
    identifying differentially coexpressed genes and
    links from gene expression microarray data.
    Bioinformatics 26(20):2637–2638
    9. Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an
    R package for weighted correlation network
    analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9:559

  8. Santos Sde S et al (2015) CoGA: an R package
    to identify differentially co-expressed gene sets
    by analyzing the graph spectra. PLoS One 10
    (8):e0135831

  9. Jiang Z et al (2016) Differential coexpression
    analysis reveals extensive rewiring of Arabidop-
    sis gene coexpression in response to pseudo-
    monas syringae infection. Sci Rep 6:35064

  10. Yu H et al (2011) Link-based quantitative
    methods to identify differentially coexpressed
    genes and gene pairs. BMC Bioinformatics
    12:315

  11. Ruan J, Dean AK, Zhang W (2010) A general
    co-expression network-based approach to gene
    expression analysis: comparison and applica-
    tions. BMC Syst Biol 4:8

  12. Elo LL et al (2007) Systematic construction of
    gene coexpression networks with applications


164 Bao-Hong Liu

Free download pdf