The Washington Post - USA (2022-05-24)

(Antfer) #1

TUESDAY, MAY 24 , 2022. THE WASHINGTON POST EZ EE E3


HEALTH NEWS

BY NANCY LAPID

A team of Australian research-
ers have identified a biochemical
marker in the blood that could
help identify newborn babies at
risk for sudden infant death syn-
drome (SIDS), a breakthrough
that they said creates an avenue to
future tragedy-preventing inter-
ventions.
The researchers, in a study pub-
lished in the Lancet’s eBio Medi-
cine, found that babies w ho died of
SIDS had lower levels of an en-
zyme called butyrylcholinesterase
(BChE) shortly after birth. BChE
plays a major role in the brain’s
arousal pathway, and low levels
would reduce a sleeping infant’s
ability to wake up or respond to its
environment.
This is the first evidence “that
babies who succumb to SIDS are
different from birth,” study leader
Carmel Harrington of the Chil-
dren’s Hospital at Westmead in
Australia told Reuters by email.
“An apparently healthy baby go-
ing to sleep and not waking up is
every parent’s nightmare,” she
said.
The enzyme abnormality is “a
measurable, specific vulnerabili-
ty” to SIDS that had not been
previously recognized, research-
ers said in the published study.
The Sydney Children’s Hospital
Network in Australia called the
discovery “a world-first break-
through.”
But researchers are “only half-
way” to the goal of fully under-
standing SIDS and being able to
prevent it, other experts said last
week in the New England Journal
of Medicine.
They warn that preventive
practices such as having babies
sleep on their backs and keeping


cribs bare must continue.
Richard Goldstein of Children’s
Hospital in Boston, lead author of
the NEJM editorial, said the new
study is good, but “it should not
change that behavior.”
Using dried blood spots taken
at birth as part of a newborn
screening program, the research-
ers compared BChE levels in 26
babies who later died of SIDS, 41
infants who died of other causes
and 655 surviving infants.
That levels of the enzyme were
on average significantly lower in
the infants who died of SIDS sug-
gest the SIDS babies were inher-
ently vulnerable to dysfunction of
the autonomic nervous system,
which controls unconscious and
involuntary functions in the body,
the researchers said.
A failure to wake up when ap-
propriate “has long been consid-
ered a key component of an in-
fant’s vulnerability” to SIDS, her
team said, adding that further re-
search “needs to be undertaken
with urgency” to determine
whether routine measurement of
BChE could help prevent future
SIDS deaths.
Even if BChE is confirmed to
play a role, “it’s not going to be the
whole solution,” Goldstein said.
Research has implicated other
possible biologic contributors
such as genetics, maternal smok-
ing and abnormal levels of the
nervous system signaling chemi-
cal serotonin.
Harrington, who lost her own
child to SIDS 29 years ago, has
dedicated her career to research-
ing the condition.
“There is a lot more work to do,”
she said. “We expect the next stag-
es of research will take between
3-5 years.”
— Reuters

Researchers discover a blood marker that could


help identify newborns who face SIDS risks


HEALTH SCAN

BY ERIN BLAKEMORE

When the bubonic plague
reached San Francisco’s China-
town in 1900, it prompted a racial
panic — and helped push science
forward.
“American Experience: Plague
at the Golden Gate,” premiering
Tuesday on PBS, tells the seeming-
ly contradictory, and all too timely,
story.
It began in a city that had the
nation’s largest Asian population
and was a center for international
trade. In 1900, an epidemic of
plague raged in East Asia, and
Marine Hospital Service bacteri-
ologist Joseph Kinyoun identified
the first case in the United States
in a Chinese immigrant named
Wong Chut King.
It was the first time the Black
Death had reached the continent,
and it prompted a racist crack-
down on San Francisco’s Asian
population. Quarantines, fumiga-
tion, searches — all focused on
Chinese immigrants and fueled by
misguided beliefs about the clean-
liness and worthiness of Asian
immigrants.
Kinyoun was convinced Chi-
nese people were spreading the
plague. But his successor, Rupert
Lee Blue, suspected the plague
wasn’t a matter of immigrants, but
of rats — and, in a race against
time, the future surgeon general
tried to stop the plague from


spreading.
It’s a story of private deals, pub-
lic health measures, corruption,
fear and even the 1906 San Fran-
cisco earthquake. And along the
way, filmmaker Li-Shin Yu tells the
cautionary tale of how discrimina-
tion and scapegoating can spread
as quickly as plague itself.
It's also hopeful.
The film chronicles how the
Chinese community successfully
fought back against the draconian
public health measures — and
shows what kinds of scientific in-
novation and successful steps for-
ward can occur when health offi-
cials work with marginalized com-
munities.
The film rings especially true in
an age of increased violence
toward Asian American commu-
nities, which are still reeling from
panic surrounding the origins of
the virus that causes covid-19. The
real plague, the movie suggests, is
racism — and hatred can both
color, and interfere with, public
health efforts.
“Plague at the Golden Gate” will
air Tuesday on PBS stations na-
tionwide and on PBS’ online and
app platforms.
The film includes Mandarin
language close-captioning.

DOCUMENTARY


How racism against immigrants hobbled


response to plague in 1900 San Francisco


American Experience: Plague at
the Golden Gate
PBS

BY KEVIN LORIA

R

ecent Consumer Re-
ports tests of more
than 100 food packag-
ing products from U.S.
restaurants and super-
markets found dangerous PFAS
chemicals in many of the prod-
ucts, including paper bags for
french fries, wrappers for ham-
burgers, molded fiber salad bowls
and single-use paper plates.
Previous CR tests found PFAS
— per- and polyfluoroalkyl sub-
stances — in drinking water and
bottled water.
That’s concerning, as growing
research documents that PFAS,
which are added to many materi-
als to make them resistant to
grease, water and stains, have led
to environmental contamination
around the globe and raised ques-
tions about their health risks
when they accumulate in our
bodies.

How we’re exposed to them
One of the main concerns
about PFAS is how long they last.
They are often called “forever
chemicals” because they break
down extremely slowly, if ever.
That persistence, combined
with the many products that now
contain PFAS, means that there
are many ways the chemicals can
enter the environment and even-
tually reach humans, too.
Consider, for example, the pro-
duction of food packaging with
PFAS coating. In Maine, wastewa-
ter sludge from mills where such
products are produced has re-
portedly been used to fertilize
fields where cattle graze. In 2020,
the Maine Department of Agri-
culture, Conservation and Forest-
ry tested milk from dairy farms
and found levels of one particular
PFAS in a sample from a farm that
were more than 150 times higher
than state regulations permit.
When food packaging contains
PFAS, some of those chemicals
can migrate into food. Other
products such as stain-resistant
carpets can leave PFAS in house-
hold dust and air.
And finally, once food packag-
ing or other products containing
PFAS are thrown away, PFAS can
leach out from landfills or spread
from incinerators into the envi-
ronment, where they can contam-

inate soil, food, water and air —
just like they can when they are
first produced.
People may then eat food con-
taining the chemicals, drink wa-
ter that contains them or even
breathe in the chemicals.
And a growing number of the
chemicals have been linked to a
variety of health problems.

PFAS and health
For decades, PFAS manufac-
turers have had information indi-
cating that the chemicals may
harm human health, according to
reporting from the Environmen-
tal Working Group. But for the
first 60 or so years that PFAS were
in production, many people
thought that potential harms
were specific to workers exposed
to the chemicals at an industrial
scale, not the general public.
Then, in 1998, a West Virginia
farmer named Wilbur Tennant
started raising concerns about
the effects that pollution from a
nearby DuPont factory had on his
cattle. This helped lead to a class-
action lawsuit alleging that this
contamination — with the PFAS
chemical perfluorooctanoic acid
(PFOA), also known as C8 —
could be affecting the approxi-
mately 70,000 people who got
water from the same polluted
source.
The resulting settlement led to
the creation of the C8 science
panel, which between 2005 and
2013 assessed links between ex-
posure to PFOA and a number of

diseases, and found probable
links between exposure and thy-
roid disease, higher cholesterol
levels, kidney and testicular can-
cer, ulcerative colitis, and preg-
nancy-induced hypertension.
Other research on various PFAS
has found links to liver damage
and kidney disease.

Safety concerns at low levels
Growing research has also
shown that health risks can occur
even at very low levels. Some of
the clearest evidence about that
risk comes from an unexpected
place: the seemingly pristine
Faroe Islands, a group of 18 small,
rocky islands midway between
Iceland and Norway in the North
Atlantic.
In 2010 and 2011, Philippe
Grandjean, a professor of envi-
ronmental medicine at the Uni-
versity of Southern Denmark,
had been studying children in the
Faroes to see whether certain
chemicals in the environment
could dampen the immune sys-
tem’s response to childhood vac-
cines. When he saw a study show-
ing that PFAS could affect animal
immune systems, he and col-
leagues decided to see whether
PFAS also affected how children
responded to the vaccines.
The results were dramatic. “I
fell off my chair,” Grandjean says.
“It was very clear these com-
pounds were inhibiting the im-
mune system.”
In 2012, Grandjean and col-
leagues first published their re-

search showing that higher levels
of PFAS in blood samples taken
from the children were associat-
ed with less effective protection
after being vaccinated.
The findings were alarming
not just for the Faroes. Blood
PFAS levels among U.S. children
are comparable, Grandjean says.
Follow-up research in other coun-
tries has confirmed this effect,
and has also shown that children
with higher blood levels of PFAS
have more infections, he says.

A toxic pattern
Still, calculating the exact level
of PFAS exposure that causes
harm isn’t straightforward, espe-
cially since there are thousands of
different PFAS, some more toxic
than others. Manufacturers have
stopped producing a couple of
these chemicals in the United
States, as concerns about their
impact on health have become
more widely known. As that has
happened, however, they’ve been
replaced by newer chemicals that
have not been as thoroughly stud-
ied by independent researchers.
Both the Food and Drug Ad-
ministration and the American
Chemistry Council, which repre-
sents PFAS manufacturers, argue
that we don’t know for sure that
newer PFAS are as unsafe as the
ones they are replacing. But a
growing body of research sug-
gests that many do pose risks,
says Miriam Rotkin-Ellman, a
senior scientist at the Natural
Resources Defense Council. A da-
tabase of research on more than
two dozen different PFAS com-
piled by a group of scientists who
study the chemicals suggests
harmful effects associated with
many of them.
“There are consistent patterns
across these chemicals,” she says,
“and the most consistent pattern
is that they’re toxic.”

FROM CONSUMER REPORTS

Troubling risks of ‘forever chemicals’

BRIANNA SOUKUP FOR THE WASHINGTON POST
In March, Adam Nordell of Songbird Farm in Unity, Maine, walks
through a greenhouse filled with spinach that is now unsellable
because of PFAS contamination.

Consumer Reports is an
independent, nonprofit organization
that works side by side with
consumers to create a fairer, safer,
and healthier world. CR does not
endorse products or services, and
does not accept advertising. CR has
no financial relationship with
advertisers in this publication. Read
more at ConsumerReports.org.

105,960

residents

The number of U.S.
residents on the
waiting list for a
lifesaving organ
transplant totaled
105,960 men, women
and children as of
late May, according
to the United
Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the nonprofit group that manages
the nation’s transplant system under contract with the federal
government. On average, 17 people die each day while waiting for an
organ transplant. In 2021, 41,354 transplants were done, with organs
from 20,401 donors, including both deceased and living donors.
Kidneys are the most frequently transplanted organ, followed by the
liver, heart, lungs, pancreas and intestines. Kidneys accounted for more
than half of transplants performed last year (24,670) and represent the
organ needed by more than 80 percent of those on the waiting list. Most
organs are donated after the donor has died, but some organs — the
kidney and liver, for instance — can come from a living donor. People
with two healthy kidneys can donate one and continue to live a normal,
active life. For a liver donation, a portion of the donor’s liver is removed
and transplanted, with the donor’s liver growing back to its normal size
within a few weeks. Donor groups say that a single donor can save up to
eight lives, those donating tissue can help more than 75 people, and
those who donate their corneas can restore sight to two people. The
National Institutes of Health notes that donated skin tissue can be used
as grafts for burn victims or for reconstruction after surgery, donated
bones can replace cancerous bones and help prevent amputation of an
arm or leg, and donated veins can be used in cardiac bypass surgery.
People who want to become an organ donor need to sign up with their
state’s registry, either online or by visiting their local motor vehicle
office. Donors can be of any age (although youths need parental
permission). A donor’s medical condition at the time of death will affect
what organs or tissue can be donated.
— Linda Searing


BIG NUMBER

Editors: Anjuman Ali, Margaret Shapiro • Art Director: Betty Chavarria


  • Advertising Information: Ron Ulrich, 202-334-5289,
    [email protected] • To contact us: E mail: health-
    [email protected]
    Te lephone: 202-334-5031 Mail: The Washington
    Post, Health, 1301 K St. NW, Washington, D.C. 200 71


HEALTH & SCIENCE

BY SYDNEY PAGE

Identical twin sisters Erin
Cheplak and Jill Justiniani had a
running joke throughout their
pregnancies that they would give
birth on the same day. They never
thought it would actually happen.
But then, suddenly, it did.
“This isn’t a joke anymore,”
Cheplak said to her sister over the
phone, just before 9 a.m. on May 5
— the date of Justiniani’s sched-
uled C-section. “My water broke.”
Just a few hours apart, the twin
sisters each gave birth to their
firstborn sons down the hall from
one another at the Kaiser Perma-
nente hospital in Anaheim, Calif.
Not only were the babies born
on the same day at the same
hospital, but even their measure-
ments matched. The boys — Jus-
tiniani’s son Oliver and Cheplak’s
son Silas — each weighed 7 pounds
and 3 ounces at birth. They were
also each 20 inches long.
Although the serendipitous
timing of their sons’ births was
shocking to the sisters, in some
ways, they said, it was par for the
course. All their lives, the 30-year-
old twins — both of whom live in
Yorba Linda, Calif., about two
miles apart — have been on paral-
lel paths.
“We’ve always done everything
together,” said Cheplak. “It has
been amazing to be able to go
through life together at every
stage. We are truly each other’s
best friend.”
As children growing up in
Brea, Calif., all their hobbies and
interests aligned, and as they
moved into adulthood, they
shared professional pursuits, too.
They studied kinesiology and
then completed the same mas-
ter’s program in occupational
therapy at California State Uni-
versity, Dominguez Hills.
Now they work at the same
outpatient clinic as pediatric oc-
cupational therapists. Their
desks are side-by-side. They often

bring each other lunch.
The sisters got married rough-
ly a year apart, and pregnant
within just eight days of each
other — which, they said, was
unplanned.
Justiniani and her husband,
Ian, had been trying to get preg-
nant for nearly a year when they
finally got a positive result on the
morning of Cheplak’s postponed
wedding celebration in August


  1. “We were tracking and hop-
    ing and praying,” said Justiniani,
    who had suffered a miscarriage a
    few months before.
    Ten days later, while on her
    honeymoon in the Maldives with
    her husband Zach, Cheplak no-
    ticed she had a heightened sense
    of smell — sometimes an early
    pregnancy symptom. She took an
    at-home test, and it was positive.
    “That was the beginning of this
    path of feeling like this is pretty
    wild, but also totally meant to
    happen,” Justiniani said.
    Although the news was unex-
    pected, Cheplak said, it felt right:
    “I just had this feeling that it was
    going to work out, that we were
    both going to be pregnant.”


Going through the ups and
downs of pregnancy together felt
natural given their synchronized
lives. It also provided them with a
lot of comfort. “With these preg-
nancies being our first, there was
so much unknown,” Cheplak said.
Beyond their shared DNA, the
sisters believe they have a partic-
ularly strong bond because of
their childhood. They had a
younger sister, Allison, who was
born with a rare, life-threatening
genetic disorder called Sialidosis.
She died at age 12 when the twins
were 18. “We grew up in a family
where our parents had to dedi-
cate a lot of their time to Allison,”
Cheplak said. “Jill and I really
latched onto each other during
those moments.”
“I really believe that we were
meant to have each other,” Justin-
iani said. “We were able to walk
through the toughest moments of
life together.”
Their younger sister’s experi-
ence is also what propelled the
twins to develop a shared passion
for occupational therapy, as they
witnessed firsthand how an occu-
pational therapist helped Allison.
They are by each other’s sides
through every obstacle, and hap-
py moments, too. Like during
their shared gender reveal Nov.


  1. “We were hopeful that we
    would have the same gender, but
    we really were unsure,” Justiniani
    said. “So when we popped our
    gender reveal balloons at the
    same time and saw a bunch of
    blue, we were both like ‘here we
    go.’ ”
    Still, they never anticipated


they would give birth on the same
day. Although they joked about
the idea, they knew the chances
were slim — and even more so
when Justiniani found out her
son was in the breech position,
and she would need to schedule a
C-section.
She and Ian chose May 5 —
Cinco de Mayo — which was Ian’s
father’s favorite holiday. He was
diagnosed with amyotrophic lat-
eral sclerosis (ALS) and died in
January, Justiniani said.
May 5 became even more mo-
mentous when her sister’s water
broke that morning, more than a
week before her due date on May
15.
Cheplak rushed over to the
hospital, and Justiniani arrived
shortly after. In another stroke of
luck, Justiniani’s operation was
delayed a few hours, so she and
her husband were able to be in
Cheplak’s delivery room. They
helped calm her during intense
and painful contractions.
“Not only did I have the sup-
port of my husband, but I had my
sister and Ian in there,” Cheplak
said. “It was like a movie.”
The sisters’ story spread rapid-
ly throughout the hospital, de-
lighting staff and patients. Alice
Lau, an obstetrician -gynecologist
at Kaiser Permanente who cov-
ered both twins’ prenatal care,
was stunned that the sisters were
simultaneously giving birth.
“It made my day, my week, and
my year,” Lau added. “This is such
fantastic news, and it reminds us
that miracles still happen.”
When Cheplak was about to get
an epidural, Justiniani was
whisked away to the operating
room for her C-section. Her son,
Oliver, was born at 6:39 p.m.
As the night wore on and Chep-
lak was still in labor, “the nurses
were like, ‘come on baby, you’re
on a deadline!’ ” Cheplak said. “It
gave me motivation to keep push-
ing.”
Then, in the nick of time, Silas
arrived at 11:31 p.m. The whole
hospital broke out in celebration.
The boys have already had dai-
ly playdates, and although they
aren’t brothers, their mothers are
certain they will always have a
twin-like tie to one another.
“We’re just so excited that they
are going to be able to have a
similar experience to us, and go
through all of life’s journeys to-
gether,” Cheplak said. “The twin-
ning continues.”

Identical twin sisters give birth on same day

BETHANY JEAN PHOTOGRAPHY
Erin Cheplak, left, holds her firstborn son, Silas, with her twin
sister, Jill Justiniani, and her firstborn son, Oliver.
Free download pdf