E6 EZ EE THE WASHINGTON POST.TUESDAY, MAY 24 , 2022
emitters of methane. It just
doesn’t stand to reason.”
The addition of hydropower to
nonpowered dams can be finan-
cially attractive to developers.
Typically the dam’s operation is
said LeRoy Coleman, director of
communications for the National
Hydropower Association. “So,
from our perspective, it’s inaccu-
rate to label hydropower, particu-
larly nonpowered dams, as major
and reservoirs have serious meth-
ane emission problems.
“Every single water body from
a marsh, to a wetland, to a lake
omit a certain amount of meth-
ane. It’s just a natural process,”
and agriculture. It naturally
emits from bodies of water as a
result of the decomposition of
organic matter. Those who favor
hydroelectric power strongly dis-
agree that America’s older dams
not changed, so there is usually
much less opposition from com-
munities and environmental
groups than there would be to a
new dam project.
Both sides agree that the meth-
ane issue needs more study and
that the exact science on methane
emissions from hydroelectric
power is not yet settled.
“The jury is still out on whether
reservoirs emit more methane
than natural lakes,” wrote Bridget
Deemer, a research ecologist with
the U.S. Geological Survey, in an
email.
Deemer added that a 2016
study she was the lead author on
found that reservoirs emit more
than previously estimated. “How-
ever, more recent work indicates
that lakes and reservoirs may be
pretty similar. The exciting thing
is that reservoir ecosystems are
highly managed to begin with so
managers have an opportunity to
adjust [reservoir] operations
based on what the data shows.”
Many of the nonpowered dam
projects being developed are run-
of-the-river hydroelectric sys-
tems. Instead of using reservoirs,
these projects typically rely on
the natural flow of the river to
spin a turbine and generate pow-
er, so their methane emissions
would most likely be very limited.
Rye Development is a leading
developer of run-of-the-river
dams and has 22 licensed hydro-
power projects in its pipeline.
The scale of these projects var-
ies.
The smallest is Kentucky Lock
and Dam 11 on the Kentucky
River. This hydropower conver-
sion makes use of a lock and dam
system developed by the Army
Corps of Engineers. The lock and
dam now belong to the state of
Kentucky, which maintains the
system to provide drinking water
and is thus critical infrastructure.
When completed later this year,
the project will produce
18,500 megawatt hours annually,
enough energy to power 1,700
homes.
Rye’s largest retrofitting proj-
ect is the Overton Project on the
Red River in Louisiana. It is a
49 megawatt project that when
finished will provide enough elec-
tricity to power more than 9,000
homes.
“We see an opportunity for
hydropower that really is going to
have a limited impact on the
environment,” said Paul Jacob,
Rye’s chief executive. “That for us
dictates where we go; we start out
looking for dams that are there
for an essential purpose. By and
large, those are navigation dams
or dams that are on flood control
properties, and most of those
projects are maintained and
owned by the Army Corps of
Engineers.”
Jacob said that Rye tends to
develop sites that are close to
each other and affect the same
watershed. Having small hydro-
power plants close to each other
can allow communities to operate
their own microgrids, a concept
increasing in popularity because
it can lend a local grid resiliency
in times of crisis or power outage.
“This is a resource where infra-
structure is already built, the
dams are still being maintained,
and they are not going away,”
Jacob said. “So why not capture
that energy and use it? Other-
wise, you know, it’s a wasted
resource.”
forecast that hydropower in the
United States could expand from
its current capacity of 101 giga-
watts to nearly 150 gigawatts by
- This growth would come
not from new dam construction
but from upgrading existing hy-
droelectric resources, adding
pumped storage capacity, and ret-
rofitting nonpowered dams for
hydropower.
Most American dams are more
than 60 years old, and many have
outlived their utility or present
public safety risks. A consensus
exists between the hydroelectric
industry and environmentalists
that these dams should be re-
moved. But hydroelectric compa-
nies also like to tap into the
energy-producing potential of
the nonpowered dams that re-
main essential to our infrastruc-
ture.
“There are a lot of dams that
are on the landscape that aren’t
serving a purpose and wouldn’t
be economic generators were you
to add hydropower to them.
Those dams need to be removed,”
said Kelly Catlett, the hydropow-
er reform program director for
American Rivers, a nonprofit
group focused on protecting and
restoring rivers and riparian eco-
systems. “But where you have a
dam that is serving another pur-
pose and it’s going to be around
for a while, why not put hydro-
power generation on it?”
Nonpowered dams compose
the vast majority of America’s
dam infrastructure. They can be
found across the country, come in
all sizes and were built to address
a wide array of needs, including
flood control, navigation, water
supply and recreation. Out of the
estimated 90,000 dams in the
United States, about 2,200 of
them generate hydroelectric
power. These hydropower re-
sources, however, account for
7 percent of national energy pro-
duction and contribute 37 per-
cent of the nation’s renewable
energy supply.
Hydropower interests and
their supporters stress that hy-
dropower could play a crucial and
potentially unique role in energy
production. Solar and wind pro-
duce energy intermittently, but
hydropower can operate 24/7.
Some hydropower facilities can
shut down or ramp up energy
production quickly, providing en-
ergy grids with stopgap flexibility
during peak demand or in the
case of blackouts.
Environmental groups stress
caution, however, noting that
even existing nonpowered dams
can produce environmental
harm, such as blocking fish pas-
sage and sediment transporta-
tion and contributing to methane
emissions.
“We know that there are signif-
icant methane emissions coming
from reservoirs and that hydro-
power operation can increase
those emissions because of the
operations of the project,” said
Colleen McNally-Murphy, associ-
ate national director for the Hy-
dropower Reform Coalition.
“There is a role for hydropower in
this country’s energy portfolio
moving forward, but it’s impor-
tant to recognize that there are
trade-offs there, as well.”
Methane, a powerful green-
house gas, is emitted by fossil fuel
production as well as by livestock
DAMS FROM E1
RICK BOWMER/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Aiming to retrofit old dams: ‘Why
not capture that energy and use it?’
ROB SCHUMACHER/ARIZONA REPUBLIC/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Lake Powell, top, an artificial reservoir on the Colorado River, was created by the flooding of Glen Canyon by the Glen Canyon
Dam, above. There is growing interest to upgrade old dams in the United States to generate more energy.
RYE DEVELOPMENT
The Kentucky River Lock and Dam 11, which Rye Development plans to electrify. The company is a leading developer of run-of-the-
river dams and has 22 licensed hydropower projects in its pipeline.