133845.pdf
tuis.
(Tuis.)
#1
180 PAUL J. MARKWICK
(habitat 'islands'), although few habitat 'islands'
are as absolute as ocean islands (Rosenzweig
1995).
The association of areas of high species diver-
sity with low latitudes, high temperatures and
high incident solar energy fluxes, has given rise
to the widely promoted species-energy theory
(Pianka 1966; Currie 1991; Rohde 1992; Stevens
1992; Currie & Fritz 1993; Latham & Ricklefs
1993; Wright et al. 1993; Brown 1995; Rosen-
zweig 1995). Currie (1991), comparing North
American terrestrial species diversity against 21
environmental variables, found that species
diversity correlated best with potential evapo-
transpiration (PET), considered to be an appro-
priate measure of ambient energy. However,
Kerr & Packer (1997) found that this was only
true for mammals in North America where PET
< 1000 mm a-
1
(Canada and Alaska). Stevens
(1989) has suggested that climate (energy) vari-
ability is the most important determinant of
species numbers, with few taxa being able to
survive large seasonal variations. Such taxa
should therefore have the largest latitudinal
ranges (Rapoport's rule), but this pattern has
not been found in all groups (Rohde et al. 1993;
Roy et al. 1994). For many this theory remains
equivocal (Pianka 1966; Rohde 1992; Roy et al.
1994; Brown 1995; Rosenzweig 1995; Kerr &
Packer 1997) because not all groups show clear
diversity gradients and the mechanism by which
energy can dictate the number of species is
uncertain.
The problem is that individual species
respond to different environmental factors (and
combinations of factors) and to different extents
depending on their physiology and ecology
(Root & Schneider 1993). Measuring only the
number of species (taxonomic diversity) rather
than the distribution of differences between
organisms (functional and ecological diversity)
may obfuscate the processes dictating diversity
patterns (Gaston 2000). It is therefore essential
to be able to examine the macroscale spatial
structure of diversity in the context of physi-
ology and behaviour (what an organism does),
as well as taxonomy (what an organism is
called), although for traditional classification
methods there is often considerable overlap
between the two. What is more, species richness
does not vary only with latitude (Brown 1995),
nor is it independent of history (evolution and
palaeobiogeography). To understand global
patterns therefore requires large, intercontin-
ental datasets. Unfortunately, there have been
few studies at this scale, and these are restricted
to analyses at relatively coarse taxonomic levels
and resolutions/grain (e.g. Gaston et al. 1995).
This paper presents a new, digital, geographic
information system-based dataset with which
the relationships between present-day terres-
trial biodiversity, biogeography and climate are
examined. Examples of the observed macro-
scale modern patterns are illustrated (both as
maps and bivariate plots) in order to facilitate
comparison with previous studies of North
America, especially that of Currie (1991). The
consequences of derived relationships for
interpretations of palaeoclimate and palaeo-
ecology are discussed. As a test of Ostrom's
(1970) suggestion of using diversity gradients
to retrodict palaeoclimate, an experiment is
presented in which the Middle Eocene
palaeotemperature of Messel, Germany, is
reconstructed using modern-day regressions
between observed taxonomic diversity and
temperature, and the results compared with
values obtained from other methods.
Methods
The dataset used in this study is part of a large
computer-based ecological database of fossil
and modern faunal and floral localities compiled
by Markwick (1996). The database is designed to
facilitate analysis at any specified taxonomic
level, such that differences between the
response of families, genera and species can be
systematically analysed. Data can also be
queried for any combination of parameters
included in the database. Since this study was
begun in 1990, the database has been integrated
into a geographic information system (ArcView
GIS and Arclnfo). The fossil data include
detailed specimen, environmental and strati-
graphic information on about 6000 Cretaceous
and Cenozoic fossil vertebrate localities, with
taxonomic and ecological data for 22 000 extant
and fossil vertebrate and floral taxa (including
habitat, size and diet). The modern data
analysed here draw on the climate information
from 1060 climate stations (Fig. 1) taken from
Muller's (1982) compilation for vegetation
studies. Each station contains monthly data for
14 climate variables including mean daily tem-
perature, mean precipitation, radiation and
potential evapotranspiration (PET). A large
number of additional parameters, including
annual metrics and combinations of variables,
have been calculated using these data. A list of
variables mentioned in this paper, their abbrevi-
ations and explanations are given in Table 1. The
propensity for stations to occur in lowland sites
reflects Muller's (1982) original requirements:
acceptable stations must contain data for a large
array of climate parameters representing time