76 Species
As mentioned above, Ray had prepared a table of species before the Historia
for Bishop John Wilkins’ magnum opus Essay Toward a Real Character and
Philosophical Language, published by the Royal Society in 1668.^125 He wrote to
Martin Lister (1639–1712) complaining of the limitations of Wilkins’ schemata:
This next week we expect the Bishop of Chester [Wilkins] at Middleton, who
desires our assistance in altering and amending his tables of natural history. To
make exact philosophical tables, you know, is a matter very difcult, not to say
impossible; to make such as are tolerable requires much diligence and experience,
and is work enough for one man’s whole life, and therefore we had need call in all
the assistance we can from our friends, especially being not free to follow nature,
but forced to bow and strain things to serve a design according to the exigency of
the character.^126
Wilkins began his Essay with the logic of division:
K. I. That common Essence wherein things of different natures do agree, is called
, general, common Kind.
That common nature which is communicable to several Individuals, is called
, Sort or special kind, specie, specifìcal. Breed.^127
In his table of his General Scheme, he explicitly describes living kinds:^128
All kinds of things and notions, to which names are to be assigned, may be distributed
into such as are either more
General; namely those Universal notions, whether belonging more properly to
Things; called TRANSCENDENTAL
...
Words; DISCOURSE. IV
Special; denoting either
CREATOR. V
Creature; namely such things as were either created or concreated by God,
not excluding several of those notions, which are framed by the minds of
men, considered either
Collectively; WORLD. VI
Distributively; according to the several kinds of Beings, Whether such as do
belong to
Substance;
Inanimate; ELEMENT. VII
Animate; considered according to their several
Species; whether
Vegetative
lmperfect; as Minerals.
STONE. VIII
METAL. IX
Perfect; as Plant,
(^125) Wilkins 1668; a reprint is available [Wilkins 2002]. An excellent discussion of the social and intel-
lectual debale of the time is in DeLacy 2016.
(^126) April 28, 1670, in Lankester 1848, 55f. On the arachnologist Lister, see Roos 2011.
(^127) Essay, 26.
(^128) Essay, 23. I have recast his bracketed table as an indented list for clarity.