266 SpeciesGao, Keqin, and Yuanlin Sun. 2003. Is the PhyloCode better than Linnaean system? New
development and debate on biological nomenclatural issues. Chinese Science Bulletin
48 (3):308 –312.
George, T. Neville. 1956. Biospecies, chronospecies and morphospecies. In The Species
Concept in Paleontology, edited by Peter C. Sylvester-Bradley, 123–137. London:
Systematics Association.
Ghiselin, Michael T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23
(4):536–544.
—. 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: The
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Niles Eldredge. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of
evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3 (2):115 –151.
Haldane, John Burton Sanders. 1956. Can a species concept be justified? In The Species
Concept in Palaeontology: A Symposium, edited by Peter C. Sylvester-Bradley, 95–96.
London: The Systematics Association.
Harlan, Jack R., and J. M. J. De Wet. 1963. The compilospecies concept. Evolution 17
(4):497–501.
Haufler, Christopher. 1996. Species concepts and speciation in pteridophytes. In Pteridology
in Perspective, edited by Josephine Camus et al. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Hey, Jody. 2001a. Genes, Concepts and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of
the Species Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
—. 2001b. The mind of the species problem. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (7):326 –329.
Hull, David Lee. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and
Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1968. When are species necessary? In Population Biology and Evolution,
edited by Richard C. Lewontin, 177–186. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
Keller, Roberto A. et al. 2003. The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. The
Botanical Review 69 (1):93 –110.
Kitcher, Philip. 1984. Species. Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308–333.
Kojima, Jun-Ichi. 2003. Apomorphy-based definition also pinpoints a node, and PhyloCode
names prevent effective communication. Botanical Review 69 (1):4 4 –58.
Kondrashov, Alexey S. 1994. The asexual ploidy cycle and the origin of sex. Nature 370
(6486):213 –216.
Lewis, Charlton T., and Charles Short. 1879. A Latin Dictionary Founded on Andrews’
Edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. Revised, enlarged and in great part rewritten by
C. T. Lewis and Charles Short. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Littlejohn, Murray J. 1981. Reproductive isolation: A critical review. In Evolution and
Speciation: Essays in Honor of M. J. D. White, edited by William R. Atchley and David
S. Woodruff, 298–334. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press.
—. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance.
Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
McOuat, Gordon R. 2001. Cataloguing power: Delineating ‘competent naturalists’ and the
meaning of species in the British Museum. The British Journal for the History of
Science 34 (1):1–28.
Nixon, Kevin C. et al. 2003. The PhyloCode is fatally flawed, and the “Linnaean” system can
easily be fixed. Botanical Review 69 (1):111–120.
Paris, Cathy A. et al. 1989. Cryptic species, species delimitation, and taxonomic practice in
the homosporous ferns. American Fern Journal 79 (2):46 –54.