Trombulak (1991)
Spermophilus
No
No
No
No (tested for)
No
Prenatal to
Manipulative
1(no)
beldingipostnatalMeikle and ThorntonMus musculusYesYesYesNot testedNoPreconception toManipulative1(yes), 2(yes)(1995)postnatalMoses at el. (1995)Neotoma cinereaAmbiguousNoYes (but with ma-Not testedNoPreconception toManipulative1(no)ternal mass, notpostnataltreatment)Sikes (1995)Neotoma floridanaNoYesNoNoNoPostnatalManipulative1(yes)Sikes (1996b)Onychomys leuco-NoYesNoNoNoPostnatalManipulative1(yes)gasterSikes (1996a)Neotoma floridanaNoNoNoNot testedNot possiblePostnatalManipulative1(yes), 2(no)Onychomys(study onleucogasterpostweaning growth)Krackow (1997)Mus musculusNoYesNoNot testedNoPreconception toDescriptive1(yes), 2(yes)postnatalDuquette and MillarPeromyscus mexi-NoYesNoNoNoPreconception toManipulative1(yes)(1998)canuspostnatalMoses et al. (1998)Neotoma cinereaNoYesYesYes (weight, butNoPostnatalManipulative1(yes)tested other parameters and found no bias)Millesi et al. (1999)SpermophilusYesYes (variedYes (varied withNo (no bias re-NoPreconception toDescriptive—citelluswith date)date)ported duringpostnatallactation)Lamb and Aarde (2001)Mastomys couchaNoNoYesNo (tested for)NoPreconception /Manipulative—prenatalaBased on direction of sex-ratio bias or other evidence of differential investment.bWas evidence presented to support that differential investment was optional and under maternal control?cWhich of the underlying assumptions of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis tested and were they validated?dClark et al. (1990) reported no differences in litter size but a decline in the probability that a female would breed on postpartum estrus after rearing an all-male litter as compared to those females rearing an all-female litter.