and genetic divergence in African mole – rats (Family Bathyer-
gidae). Molecular Ecology13 : 613 –29.
Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2002. Material and genetic
benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Animal Be-
haviour64 : 361– 67.
Feldhammer, G., B. Thompson, and J. Chapman. (eds.). 2003.
Wild mammals of North America: Biology, management, and
conservation.2nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity Press.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method.
American Naturalist125 : 1–15.
Fenn, M. G. P. 1989. The ecology of the Norway rat (Rattus Nor-
vegicus) on lowland farms in England. PhD diss., University of
Oxford.
Fenn, M. G. P., and D. W. Macdonald. 1995. Use of middens by
red foxes: Risk reverses rhythms of rats. Journal of Mammal-
ogy76 : 130 –36.
Fenn, M. G. P., T. E. Tew, and D. W. Macdonald. 1987. Rat
movements and control on an Oxfordshire farm. Journal of
Zoology, London213 : 745 – 49.
Ferkin, M. H. 1987. Parental care and social interactions in cap-
tive plateau mice, Peromyscus melanophrys. Journal of Mam-
malogy68 : 266 –74.
———. 1999. Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus,Arvicoli-
dae) over-mark and adjacent-mark the scent marks of same-
sex conspecifics. Ethology105 : 825 –37.
———. 2001. Patterns of sexually distinct scents in Microtus
spp. Canadian Journal of Zoology79 : 1621–25.
Ferkin, M. H., J. Dunsavage, and R. E. Johnston. 1999. What kind
of information do meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)
use to distinguish between the top and bottom scent of an over-
mark?Journal of Comparative Psychology113 : 43 –51.
Ferkin, M. H., S. T. Leonard, K. Bartos, and M. K. Schmick.
- Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the length of
time they prefer the top-scent donor of an over-mark. Ethol-
ogy107 : 1099 –1114.
Ferkin, M. H., S. T. Leonard, L. A. Heath, and G. Paz-y-Mino C. - Self-grooming as a tactic used by prairie voles Microtus
ochrogasterto enhance sexual communication. Ethology107 :
939 – 49.
Ferkin, M. H., and R. E. Johnston. 1995. Meadow voles,Microtus
pennsylvanicus,use multiple sources of scent for sex recogni-
tion.Animal Behaviour49 : 37– 44.
Ferkin, M. H., and T. F. Rutka. 1990. Mechanisms of sibling
recognition in meadow voles. Canadian Journal of Zoology
68 : 609 –13.
Ferkin, M. H., E. S. Sorokin, and R. E. Johnston. 1996. Self-
grooming as a sexually dimorphic communicative behaviour
in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behav-
iour51 : 801–10.
Ferkin, M. H., E. S. Sorokin, R. E. Johnston, and C. J. Lee. 1997.
Attractiveness of scents varies with protein content of the diet
in meadow voles. Animal Behaviour53 : 133 – 41.
Ferrara, J. 1985. Prairie home companions. National Wildlife
23 : 48 –53.
Ferris, C. F., and Y. Delville. 1994. Vasopressin and serotonin
interactions in the control of agonistic behavior. Psychoneu-
roendocrinology19 : 593 – 601.
Ferris, C. F., Y. Delville, S. Bonigut, and M. A. Miller. 1999.
Galanin antagonizes vasopressin-stimulated flank marking in
male golden hamsters. Brain Research 832 : 1– 6.
Ferris, C. F., R. H. Melloni, Jr., G. Koppel, K. W. Perry, R. W.
Fuller, and Y. Delville. 1997. Vasopressin /serotonin interac-
tions in the anterior hypothalamus control aggressive behav-
ior in golden hamsters. Journal of Neuroscience17 : 4331– 40.
Ferron, J. 1984. Behavioral ontogeny analysis of sciurid rodents,
with emphasis on the social behavior of ground squirrels. In
The biology of ground-dwelling squirrels,ed. J. O. Murie and
G. R. Michener, 24 – 42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska
Press.
———. 1996. How do woodchucks (Marmota monax) cope with
harsh winter conditions?Journal of Mammalogy77 : 412 –16.
Ferron, J., and J.-P. Ouellet. 1989a. Behavioural context and pos-
sible function of scent marking by cheek rubbing in the red
squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). Canadian Journal of
Zoology67 : 1650 –53.
———. 1989b. Temporal and intersexual variation in the use
of space with regard to social organization in the wood-
chuck (Marmota monax). Canadian Journal of Zoology67 :
1642 – 49.
Festa-Bianchet, M. 1996. Offspring sex ratio studies of mam-
mals: Does publication depend upon the quality of the re-
search or the direction of the results? Ecoscience3 : 42 – 44.
Festing, M, P. Overend, R. Gaine Das, M. Cortina Borja, and M.
Berdoy. 2002. The design of animal experiments: Reducing
the use of animals in research through better experimental
design.London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
Figala, J. 1963. Yellow mutant in the brown rat, Rattus Norvegi-
cus(Berk.). Acta Societatis Zoological Bohemoslovenicae28 :
209 –10.
Figueroa, F., E. Neufeld, U. Ritte, and J. Klein. 1988. t-specific
DNA polymorphisms among wild mice from Israel and Spain.
Genetics119 : 157– 60.
Finch, C. E. 1990. Longevity, senescence, and the genome.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, R. B., and P. S. Brown. 1993. Vaginal secretions increase
the likelihood of intermale aggression in Syrian hamsters.
Physiology and Behavior54 : 213 –14.
Fischer, R. B., and J. McQuiston. 1991. A possible role for
Syrian hamster, Mesocricetus auratus,vaginal secretion in
inter-female competition. Animal Behaviour42 : 949 –54.
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisler, G. F. 1963. Adaptations and speciation in harvest mice of
the San Francisco Bay region. Journal of Mammalogy48 :
549 –56.
Fitch, H. S. 1948a. Ecology of the California ground squirrel on
grazing lands. American Midland Naturalist39 : 513 – 96.
———. 1948b. Habits and economic relationships of the Tulare
kangaroo rat. Journal of Mammalogy29 : 5 –35.
———. 1949. Study of snake populations in central California.
American Midland Naturalist41 : 513 –79.
———. 1958. Home ranges, territories, and seasonal movements
of vertebrates of the natural history reservation.University of
Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History11 : 63 –326.
Fitch, H. S., and D. G. Rainey. 1956. Ecological observations on
the woodrat, Neotoma floridana. University of Kansas Publi-
cations, Museum of Natural History8 : 499 –533.
Fitzgerald, J. P., and R. R. Lechleitner. 1974. Observations on
the biology of Gunnison’s prairie dog in central Colorado.
American Midland Naturalist92 : 146 – 63.
Fitzgerald, R. W., and D. M. Madison. 1983. Social organization
of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pineto-
rum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13 : 183 – 87.References 521