Kotler, B. P., and L. Blaustein. 1995. Titrating food and safety in
a heterogeneous environment: When are the risky and safe
patches of equal value? Oikos74 : 251–58.
Kotler, B. P., L. Blaustein, and J. S. Brown. 1992. Predator
facilitation: The combined effect of snakes and owls on the
foraging behaviour of gerbils. Annales Zoologici Fennici
29 : 199 –206.
Kotler, B. P., J. S. Brown, S. R. X. Dall, S. Gresser, D. Ganey, and
A. Bouskila. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their
predators: Temporal dynamics of resource depletion and
apprehension in gerbils. Evolutionary Ecology Research
4 : 495 –518.
Kotler, B. P., J. S. Brown, and O. Hasson. 1991. Owl predation
on gerbils: The role of body size, illumination and habitat
structure on rates of predation. Ecology72 : 2249 – 60.
Kotler, B. P., J. S. Brown, A. Oldfield, J. Thorson, and D. Cohen.
- Foraging substrate and escape substrate: Patch use by
three species of gerbils. Ecology82 : 1781– 90.
Kotler, B. P., J. S. Brown, R. H. Slotow, W. L. Goodfriend, and
M. I. Strauss. 1993. The influence of snakes on the foraging
behavior of gerbils. Oikos67 : 309 –18.
Kotler, B. P., J. S. Brown, R. J. Smith, and W. O. Wirtz II. 1988.
The effects of morphology and body size on rates of owl pre-
dation on desert rodents. Oikos53 : 145 –52.
Kotliar, N. B. 2000. Application of the new keystone-concept to
prairie dogs: How well does it work? Conservation Biology
14 : 1715 –21.
Kotliar, N. B., B. W. Baker, A. D. Whicker, and G. Plumb. 1999.
A critical review of assumptions about the prairie dog as a
keystone species. Environmental Management24 : 177– 92.
Kotliar, N. B., B. Miller, R. P. Reading, and T. W. Clark. 2006.
The prairie dog as a keystone species. In Conservation of the
black-tailed prairie dog,ed. J. L. Hoogland, 53 – 64. Washing-
ton, DC: Island Press.
Kozlov, A. N. 1979. Population of northern Kazakhstan by the
brown rat. The Soviet Journal of Ecology10 : 572 –75.
Krackow, S. 1992. Sex ratio manipulation in wild house mice:
The effect of fetal resorption in relation to the mode of repro-
duction. Biology of Reproduction47 : 541– 48.
Krackow, S. 1995. The developmental asynchrony hypothesis for
sex ratio manipulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology
176 : 273 – 80.
Krackow, S. 1997. Maternal investment, sex differential pros-
pects, and the sex ratio in wild house mice. Behavioral Ecol-
ogy and Sociobiology41 : 435 – 43.
Krackow, S. 2002. Why parental sex ratio manipulation is rare in
higher vertebrates. Ethology108 : 1041–56.
Krackow, S., and P. S. Burgoyne. 1998. Timing of mating, devel-
opmental asynchrony and the sex ratio in mice. Physiology
and Behavior63 : 81– 84.
Krackow, S., and H. N. Hoeck. 1989. Sex ratio manipulation,
maternal investment and behavior during concurrent preg-
nancy and lactation in house mice. Animal Behaviour
37 : 177– 86.
Krackow, S., and B. Matuschak. 1991. Mate choice for non-
siblings in wild house mice: Evidence from a choice test and a
reproductive test. Ethology88 : 99 –108.
Kramer, K. M., B. S. Cushing, and C. S. Carter. 2003. Develop-
mental effects of oxytocin on stress response: Single versus
repeated exposure. Physiology and Behavior79 : 775 – 82.
Kramer, K. M., J. A. Monjeau, E. C. Birney, and R. S. Sikes. - Phyllotis xanthopygus. Mammalian Species617 : 1–7.
Krames, L., and L. A. Mastromatteo. 1973. Role of olfactory
stimuli during copulation in male and female rats. Journal of
Comparative and Physiological Psychology85 : 528 –35.
Kraus, C., J. Kenkele, and F. Trillmich. 2003. Spacing behaviour
and its implications for the mating system of a precocial small
mammal: An almost asocial cavy Cavia magna? Animal Be-
haviour66 : 225 –38.
Krause, J., and G. D. Ruxton. 2002. Living in groups.Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Krebs, C. J. 1966. Demographic changes in fluctuating popula-
tions of Microtus californicus. Ecological Monographs36 :
239 –73.
———. 1978. A review of Chitty’s hypothesis of population reg-
ulation. Canadian Journal of Zoology56 : 2463 – 80.
———. 1984. Voles and lemmings. InThe encyclopedia of mam-
mals,ed. D. W. Macdonald, 651–55. New York: Facts on File.
———. 1985. Do changes in spacing behaviour drive population
cycles in small mammals? In Behavioural ecology: Ecologi-
cal consequences of adaptive behaviour,ed. R. M. Sibly and
R. H. Smith, 295 –312. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1996. Population cycles revisited. Journal of Mammal-
ogy77 : 8 –24.
———. 2003. How does rodent behaviour impact on population
dynamics? In Rats, mice and people: Rodent biology and
management,ed. G. R. Singleton, L. A. Hinds, C. J. Krebs,
and D. M. Spratt, 117–23. Canberra: Australian Centre for
International Agricultural Research.
Krebs, C. J., B. L. Keller, and R. H. Tamarin. 1969. Microtus
population biology: Demographic changes in fluctuating
populations of M. ochrogasterand M. pennsylvanicusin
southern Indiana. Ecology50 : 587– 607.
Krebs, C. J., A. J. Kenney, and G. R. Singleton. 1995. Movements
of feral house mice in agricultural landscapes. Australian
Journal of Zoology43 : 293 –302.
Krebs, C. J., J. A. Redfield, and M. J. Taitt. 1978. A pulsed re-
moval experiment on the vole Microtus townsendii. Canadian
Journal of Zoology56 : 2253 – 62.
Krebs, C. J., G. R. Singleton, and A. J. Kenney. 1994. Six reasons
why feral house mouse populations might have low recapture
rates. Wildlife Research21 : 559 – 67.
Krinke, G. H., ed. 2000. The laboratory rat.San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
Krohne, D. T. 1997. Dynamics of metapopulations of small
mammals. Journal of Mammalogy78 : 1014 –26.
Kronfeld, N., T. Dayan, N. Zisapel, and A. Haim. 1994. Coex-
isting populations of Acomys cahirinusand A. russatus: A
preliminary report. Israel Journal of Zoology40 : 177– 83.
Kroodsma, D. E. 1982. Song repertoires: Problems in their defi-
nition and use. In Acoustic communication in birds,ed.
D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, 125 – 46. New York:
Academic Press.
Kruckenhauser, L., W. Pinsker, E. Haring, and W. Arnold. 1999.
Marmot phylogeny revisited: Molecular evidence for a di-
phyletic origin of sociality. Journal of Zoological Systematics
and Evolutionary Research37 : 49 –56.
Kruczek, M. 1997. Male rank and female choice in the bank vole,
Clethrionomys glareolus.Behavioural Processes40 : 171–76.
Kruczek, M., and A. Golas. 2003. Behavioural development of
conspecific odour preferences in bank voles, Clethrionomys
glareolus. Behavioural Processes64 : 31–39.
Kruczek, M., and E. Pochron. 1997. Chemical signals from
conspecifics modify the activity of female bank voles Clethri-
onomys glareolus. Acta Theriologica 42 :71–78.
Kuch, M., N. Rohland, J. L. Betancourt, C. Latorre, S. Steppan,544 References