Exploratory Study on Circular Economy Approaches A Comparative Analysis of Theory and Practice

(Rick Simeone) #1

4.5 Case Gamma 67


67


  1. If the customer was moving home he/she could remove the parquet and take


it with him/her.


  1. Give responsibility to a third party to remove, refurbish and reuse the parquet.

  2. Lease parquet instead of selling it.


The advantage of option one is that the organization is able to recover the high-qual-


ity parquet and resell it, only having to make minor additional efforts to refurbish


it. Option two gives the customer the choice of a second use for the parquet. The


organization would not have to make any additional efforts but at the same time it


would receive no benefits e.g. through reselling the refurbished parquet. The last


option is probably the most economically reasonable particularly in situations where


the parquet is far away from production sites. In these cases, it might neither be


economically nor ecologically reasonable to transport the parquet several hundred


kilometers to refurbish and resell it. A third party should be considered to remove the


parquet and reuse it. As with option two, this option requires no additional efforts


but results in no additional benefits for the organization. A fourth option considered


to close the loop and to retrieve the parquet is to lease the parquet rather than sell


it. The interviewee describes the idea as follows: “This means we give customers who


decide that they no longer like their flooring the option to have it removed and we pay


for 10 percent to 15 percent of the parquet” (see Appendix: German Quote 10). The


benefit of this approach is that the organization is able to rescue the parquet at the


end of its first life-cycle to refurbish and resell it. Furthermore, this option results


in lower costs for the customer and provides him/her with the choice to change the


parquet after having it for a couple of years. This approach is still being developed


and therefore has not yet been implemented by the organization.


To summarize, the circular economy approach selected by case Gamma is

working for the organization. However, many questions still have to be answered


before the circular economy approach is implemented fully. The loop can be closed


but just how has not yet been decided and the infrastructure to do so is lacking.


The second circular economy approach chosen by the organization is circular

supplies on process level. This means the organization uses renewable energy in


its production process and has environmentally compatible water management.


4.5.2 Motivation to engage in Circular Economy


The reasons why the organization chose to invest in the concept of circular economy


and close-loop production are manifold.

Free download pdf