BAE Systems

(backadmin) #1

30 The Aircraft of British Aerospace and BAE SYSTEMS 1977 - 2017


ATPF Freighter project. This offered
both bulk ‘E’ class and Large Freight
Door versions (LFD). The ATPF is a true
8-tonne plus freighter, capable of
carrying eight LD3 containers or six LD4s
when fitted with the Large Freight Door,
or bulk loading of up to eight tonnes
when configured with an E-Class
compartment.
The first ATPF fitted with the LFD,
SE-LGZ flew from West Atlantic Airlines’
base at Linkoping in Sweden on 10 July


  1. In total 23 ATPs were fitted with
    LFDs while 20 ATPs were converted to
    the bulk role with E-Class interiors. Eleven
    ATPFs are still operated throughout
    Europe and to North Africa by West
    Atlantic Airlines, and two more are
    operating in Indonesia with Deraya Air
    Services. Only five pure passenger


versions remain in operation with NextJet
of Sweden.

Conclusion
The steady development and
refinement of the 748, maintained
demand for the aircraft and amply
repaid Hawker Siddeley for risking its
capital. If BAe had launched a 748
upgrade with the same seating capacity
earlier, it could have done as well as the
Fokker 50, especially if it had come to
market ahead of the ATR. But by the
time that the ATP finally arrived in 1988,
the ATR42 had gathered many orders,
with the Fokker 50 coming a creditable
second. Ironically the ATP then found
itself head-to-head with the larger
ATR72, the latter now based on the
proven and highly successful ATR42 and

with a growing customer base
compared to the rapidly declining 748
community, many of whom of course
had already switched to the smaller ATR.
The ATP failed to match the
performance and economics of the ATR.
The ATP cruised slower than the ATR
owing to using the 748 wing, by then
approximately thirty years old. The ATP
could only compete by adding more
power, which was offered but came at a
cost of increased fuel burn and engine
maintenance costs. However the ATP
has performed well as a freighter and
accessed a market that at the time the
ATR72 could not match, given its much
higher cost. The structure of the ATP is
very robust and the door design very
simple compared to the more complex
powered door of the ATR freighter. ■
Free download pdf