The Economist May 28th 2022 Asia 51
T
hemenusduringPresidentJoe
Biden’svisittoTokyothisweekre
flectedthetastesofJapan’sprimemin
ister,KishidaFumio,whosefamilyis
fromHiroshima.TherewereHiroshima
beeffillets,Hiroshimavegetablesand
Hiroshimalemonsodas.Theagenda,
however,owedmoretoAbeShinzo,a
formerprimeministerwholedthecoun
tryfrom 2012 to2020.
Japanpromisedtospendmuchmore
ondefenceandurgedAmericatorejoin
anAsiantradepactthebiggercountry
hadditched.Botharelongtimecausesof
MrAbe’s.MrKishidachattedwithMr
Bidenaboutthe“FreeandOpenIndo
Pacific”,a conceptMrAbecodified.The
twoleadersmettheirAustralianand
IndiancounterpartsaspartoftheQuad,
a groupingMrAbechampioned.
ThoughMrKishidaleadstheruling
LiberalDemocraticParty(ldp), andthus
Japanitself,thepartyremainsunderthe
swayofMrAbe,especiallywhenit comes
toforeignandsecuritypolicy.“Kishidais
nottheagendasetterforJapan—Abeis,”
saysTobiasHarris,theauthorofa biogra
phyoftheformerprimeminister.
MrAbe’sbasicstrategyremainsthe
defaultforJapan:doublingdownonthe
alliancewithAmericawhilebeefingup
itsowndefencesandstrengthening
partnershipswiththirdcountriesto
counterChina’srise.Eventheopposition
hasstruggledtoarticulateanalternative
course.AsMichaelGreen,anAmerican
academicandformergovernmentoffi
cial,arguesina newbook,“LineofAd
vantage”,thetrajectorysetunderMrAbe
lookslikelytoendurefora generation:
“Whatisnowinplaceisa grandstrategy
fortheeraofAbeShinzo—notjustthe
tenureofAbeShinzo.”
Yetwhilethedirectionhasbeenset,
thecountryhasyettoarrivewhereMr
Abewouldlike:a Japanlessshackledtoits
postwarpastandmoreautonomousinits
security.“Japanlikestospeakaboutan
idealworld,”MrAbetellsTheEconomist.
“Butwemustchangeourattitudeofleav
ingallmilitarymatterstoAmerica.Japan
musttakeresponsibilityforpeaceand
stability,and...worktogetherwithAmer
icatoachieveit.”
Thatunfinishedbusinessmaybeone
reasonwhyhehasescheweda quietretire
ment.Hismentor,KoizumiJunichiro,a
formerprimeminister,retiredfrompoli
ticssoonafterleavingofficeandlenthis
voicetothesuperherocharacterUltraman
Kingin“MegaMonsterBattleUltraGalaxy:
TheMovie”.Aftersteppingdownasprime
ministerbecauseofa chronicillnessin
2020,MrAbeimmediatelyreturnedtothe
Diet,wherehenowleadstheldp’s largest
faction.Hehasusedhisvoicetocontinue
callingfora moreassertivesecuritypolicy,
a causethathastakenona newurgency
afterVladimirPutin’sinvasionofUkraine.
TheJapanesepeoplehavehadto“face
thereality”thatinvasionsarepossiblein
themodernera,MrAbesays.Sinceleaving
office,hehastalkedmoreopenlyabout
thedefenceofTaiwan.Recently,hehas
urgedJapantodiscusshostingAmerican
nukes,assomenatomembersdo.Asfor
thetimeandpoliticalcapitalhespenton
his 27 meetingswithMrPutin,hedoes
notregretit “atall”;hebacksMrKishi
da’stougherapproachtoRussiainthe
wakeoftheinvasion.
Heseemsdeterminedtousehisbully
pulpit—andhisbigvotingblocinparlia
ment—topragmaticallyadvancehis
goals,ratherthanpickingideological
fights.HistalkofhostingAmerican
nukesisintendedtoendthe“taboo”
arounddiscussingnucleardeterrence,
nottomaketheideaanimmediatereali
ty,MrAbeinsists.Insteadofmakinga
renewedcaseforrevisingJapan’spost
warconstitution,hetoutsthe“epoch
making”natureofthemorelimitedlegal
changeshemanagedtopass,which
allowtheJapaneseSelfDefenceForcesto
operateina widerrangeofsituations.
YetinJapan,MrAberemainsa polar
isingfigure.Tosomeobservers,his
recentoutspokennesspointstothe
reemergenceofAbetheideologue,freed
fromtheresponsibilityofhigherofficeto
pushthenationalistcauseswithwhich
hehaslongbeenidentified.MrKishida,a
morevanillafigure,mayinfactbebetter
placedtomovetheldp’s securityagenda
forward.Sincefewerpeople,especially
liberals,have“anallergicreaction”toMr
Kishida,hemayfindit easiertogetJapan
to“swallowbittermedicine”,saysAkita
Hiroyuki,a commentatorforNikkei, a
Japanesedaily.MrAbe’splansforbeefier
Japanesesecurity,inshort,maygodown
betterwitha slabofHiroshimabeef.
AbeShinzo,a hawkishformerprimeminister,stillloomslargeoverJapan
Banyan TheAbeera
.............................................................
To read a full transcript of The Economist’s
interview with Mr Abe, please visit
economist.com/AbeInterview
in 2019, a school in Karnataka, in the south,
forced students to wear cardboard boxes
over their heads—cut open on one side—to
foil cheating.
Yet even as officials come up with novel
ideas, so do the cheats. In February, a med
ical student at Mahatma Gandhi Memorial
College in Indore, a small city, was caught
with a skincoloured Bluetooth device sur
gically implanted in his ear. A phone
linked to the device was sewn into a secret
trouser pocket. Last year, ten students tak
ing a traineeteacher exam were arrested
for attempting to use Bluetooth gadgets
concealed in the soles of their flipflops. At
least 25 students had bought such footwear
from a gang for 600,000 rupees ($7,700) a
pair. It is often mandatory for students to
remove shoes and socks before exams.
Parents, too, sometimes help with the
cheating. In 2015 dozens of them scaled the
outside of a fivestorey building to pass an
swers to their schoolchildren taking cru
cial yearend exams inside. Hundreds, in
cluding parents, were arrested and at least
750 students expelled.
The problem may be with the education
system itself, rather than any innate dis
honesty among students. Teachers receive
low salaries and can be bribed to help or
turn a blind eye. Schools care about pass
rates. Learning revolves around memorisa
tion rather than understanding or reason
ing. Outcomes are poor. Exams requiring
thought rather than regurgitation would
be harder to memorise, says Ms Sinha. The
quality of education would improve, too.
The Indian government is mulling changes
to the way it assesses students at higher
levels. Until then, thecatandmouse game
between students and invigilators is
doomed to continue.n