The Washington Post - USA (2022-05-28)

(Antfer) #1

A14 EZ RE THE WASHINGTON POST.SATURDAY, MAY 28 , 2022


BY AMANDA COLETTA

toronto — The Canadian Su-
preme Court ruled Friday that a
federal law that effectively autho-
rizes life imprisonment without
parole is unconstitutional, find-
ing that it violates protections
against cruel and unusual pun-
ishment and brings “the admin-
istration of justice into disre-
pute.”
“Such sentences are degrading
in nature and thus incompatible
with human dignity,” the court
said in a unanimous decision,
“because they deny offenders any
possibility of reintegration into
society, which presupposes, de-
finitively and irreversibly, that
they lack the capacity to reform
and reenter society.”
The psychological effects, it
concluded, “are in some respects
comparable to those experienced
by inmates on death row, since
only death will end their incar-
ceration.”
The ruling was highly antici-
pated here, in part because of the
offender at its center: Alexandre
Bissonnette, the man who killed
six people at a Quebec City
mosque in 2017. The top court
sentenced him to life without the
possibility of parole for 25 years.
Prosecutors initially sought a


sentence of life without parole
for 150 years.
But the impact of the decision
extends well beyond Bissonnette.
A man found guilty on 10 charges
of first-degree murder after ram-
ming a white rental truck into
unsuspecting pedestrians on a
major Toronto thoroughfare in
2018 has not yet been sentenced,
pending the outcome of this case.
The Supreme Court said its
declaration of invalidity is retro-
active to the date the 2011 law
was enacted, meaning those who
have been sentenced under the
statute can now seek relief. They
include the man who killed three
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
officers in 2014 and was sen-
tenced to life without parole for
75 years.
All U.S. states except Alaska
authorize life without parole, ac-
cording to a 2021 report from the
Sentencing Project, which found
that over 80 percent of people
serving life without parole in the
world are in U.S. prisons.
In 1967, when Canada abol-
ished the death penalty, it set life
imprisonment with no chance at
parole for 25 years as the manda-
tory sentence for adults convict-
ed of first-degree murder. The
parole ineligibility periods for
offenders convicted of multiple

murders were to be served con-
currently.
That changed in 2011, when
Parliament passed a law giving
judges the ability to stack parole
ineligibility periods of 25 years
for each murder conviction, so
that they were served consecu-
tively. It meant offenders could
effectively be sentenced to life
without parole or to sentences
longer than the human life span.
Bissonnette, armed with a
semiautomatic weapon and a
pistol, opened fire on 46 people
gathered for evening prayers at a
Quebec City mosque in 2017,
killing half a dozen and severely
injuring others. At his trial, pros-
ecutors claimed his attack was
premeditated. They alleged that
he had spent time online re-
searching the Ku Klux Klan, oth-
er mass shootings and their per-
petrators and had frequently
checked the Twitter accounts of
conspiracy theorists and far-
right figures.
Bissonnette told police that he
was motivated by a pledge from
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to
welcome those “fleeing persecu-
tion, terror and war” regardless
of their faith, a message that
Trudeau tweeted after President
Donald Trump imposed a U.S.
entry ban on people from seven

Muslim-majority countries.
Bissonnette pleaded guilty in
2018 to six counts of first-degree
murder. Prosecutors in Quebec
asked for a life sentence without
the possibility of parole for
150 years, six consecutive parole
ineligibility periods of 25 years
for each victim.
Quebec Superior Court Justice
Francois Huot wrote in his deci-
sion that the date of the mosque
attack “will forever be written in
blood in the history of this city,
this province and this country.”
But he found the 2011 law “gross-
ly disproportionate and totally
incompatible with human digni-
ty.”
“Canada,” Huot wrote, “is not a
country where we lock up the
most undesirable elements of
society in a dungeon, toss the key
to their freedom into the wide
river of collective indifference
and then forget about their very
existence.”
He ordered Bissonnette to
serve five ineligibility periods of
25 years concurrently and tacked
on 15 years for the sixth victim for
a sentence of life without a
chance at parole for 40 years. In a
later 3-0 decision, a Quebec ap-
peals court said the 2011 law
violated constitutional protec-
tions to not be subjected to cruel

and unusual punishment and the
right to life, liberty and security
of the person. It declared it
unconstitutional and sentenced
Bissonnette to life without parole
for 25 years.
Prosecutors appealed to the
Supreme Court. Civil liberties
groups urged that the law be
struck down. The attorneys gen-
eral of Canada and several prov-
inces, as well as police groups
and relatives of the murder vic-
tims of a notorious Canadian
serial killer, asked the court to
uphold the law.
In legal filings, several of the
parties granted intervenor sta-
tus, similar to “friend of the
court” status in U.S. courts, con-
tended that before the 2011 law,
people convicted of multiple
murders were effectively given a
“free pass” or sentencing “dis-
count” for each additional mur-
der.
The Canadian Association of
Chiefs of Police said Bissonnette
is “the epitome” of a case justify-
ing the need for the law. The
Supreme Court said the “horror
of the crimes ... does not negate
the basic proposition that all
human beings carry within them
a capacity for rehabilitation” and
that its finding “must not be seen
as devaluing the life of each

innocent victim.”
“Everyone would agree that
multiple murders are inherently
despicable acts and are the most
serious crimes,” the court said.
This appeal is “about the limits of
the state’s power to punish of-
fenders, which, in a society
founded on the rule of law, must
be exercised in a manner consis-
tent with the constitution.”
The National Council of Cana-
dian Muslims said in a statement
that the survivors of the mass
shooting and their families will
have their wounds reopened
each time Bissonnette appears
for a parole hearing. “Today, we
are thinking about the families,”
said Mustafa Farooq, the group’s
chief executive. “Their pain has
never fully healed, and their
wounds are reopened today as
they struggle with the possibility
of being among the one who
killed their loved ones that
night.”
David Lametti, Canada’s jus-
tice minister, said in a statement
that he acknowledged the “hurt
and anger” rekindled by the deci-
sion. He said that while the
government supported a judge’s
discretion to lengthen the parole
ineligibility period, it would re-
spect the decision “and carefully
review its implications.”

Canadian high court decides life in prison without parole i s unconstitutional


BY BRADY DENNIS
AND STEVEN MUFSON

Top environmental ministers
from the Group of Seven major
industrial countries agreed Fri-
day to end government financing
for international coal-fired power
generation and to accelerate the
phasing out of unabated coal
plants by the year 2035.
The group said that it would
aim to have “predominantly de-
carbonized electricity sectors by
2035.”
The commitments on the
phaseout of coal plants will par-
ticularly affect Japan, which re-
lies heavily on coal-fired power
plants.
Unabated coal plants include
those that have not yet adopted
technology for capturing and us-
ing carbon dioxide.
The G-7 ministers also said that
new road vehicles in their coun-
tries would be “predominantly”
zero-emissions vehicles by 2030,
and that they plan to accelerate
cuts in the use of Russian natural
gas, which would be replaced by
clean power in the long term.
The private sector in the major
industrial countries must crank
up financing, the ministers said,
moving “from billions to tril-
lions.” The group acknowledged
the need laid out by the Interna-
tional Energy Agency for the G-
economies to invest at least


$1.3 trillion in renewable energy,
tripling investments in clean
power and electricity networks
between 2021 and 2030.
“The G-7 committing to end
public finance for fossil fuels and
shift it to clean is a massive win,”
Bronwen Tucker, public finance
campaign co-manager at Oil
Change International, said in a
statement. “We now need con-
crete action, not just words.”
Friday’s commitments mark
the latest in a global push for
nations — and in particular the
largest and wealthiest ones — to
halt public funding for fossil fuel
projects around the world, and to

help developing countries grow
their economies without relying
on dirty fuels such as coal.
The effort has gained steam in
recent years, even as the transi-
tion to cleaner forms of energy is
not happening nearly as fast as
scientists say is necessary for the
world to meet the goals of the
Paris climate agreement.
At a major U.N. climate confer-
ence last fall in Glasgow, Scot-
land, dozens of countries pledged
to phase out their use of coal.
While nations such as Poland and
Vietnam joined in that pact, some
of the world’s biggest users of the
planet-heating fuel, including

China and the United States, did
not sign on to the agreement.
The United States and nearly
two dozen other nations did,
however, embrace a separate
agreement vowing to stop spend-
ing tax dollars to support interna-
tional fossil fuel projects, a move
the group said would divert
$18 billion a year toward clean
energy.
That promise to restrict public
money for foreign fossil fuel proj-
ects doesn’t affect what countries
do at home. China, Japan and
South Korea, which together
make up nearly half of interna-
tional public funding for fossil
fuel projects, did not join that
agreement at the climate confer-
ence, known as COP26.
While the final pact that nearly
200 nations agreed to in Glasgow
included the first explicit men-
tion of “coal” and “fossil fuel
subsidies,” the language of that
provision was watered down over
the course of the summit. It ulti-
mately called upon nations to
“phase-down” rather than
“phase-out” only “unabated” coal
and “inefficient” fossil fuel subsi-
dies.
Halting the flow of money to
new fossil fuel development is
essential to meeting the world’s
climate goals, activists and ana-
lysts say. Last spring, the Interna-
tional Energy Agency published a
“road map” to zeroing out carbon

emissions by 2050; according to
that plan, there should be no new
development of fossil fuel sup-
plies after that year.
But the world still depends
heavily on fossil fuels, especially
its biggest emitters.
When U.S. greenhouse gas
emissions roared back in 2021
after a brief drop during the early
phase of the coronavirus pan-
demic, a significant factor was a
17 percent surge in coal-fired elec-
tricity, according to an analysis by
the Rhodium Group.
And last November, Chinese
officials reported that their coal
production surged to its highest
level in years, the same day that
officials in India’s capital readied
a shutdown because of air pollu-
tion.
But while the shift has been
slow and uneven, some countries
have forged ahead in their efforts
to scale back their reliance on
fossil fuels.
For instance, the government
in Britain recently proposed a
windfall profits tax in the form of
a 25 percent surcharge on “the
extraordinary profits the oil and
gas sector is making.” It would
raise 5 million pounds that would
go to help citizens pay for the cost
of living. At the same time, the
government is proposing a “super
deduction” to encourage oil and
gas companies to invest in proj-
ects in the United Kingdom. The

deduction would double tax relief
for companies investing in the
United Kingdom, covering 91 per-
cent of those investments.
Alden Meyer, senior associate
at climate think tank E3G, said it
is critical that G-7 leaders find
ways to accelerate the shift to
cleaner energy this decade.
“We needed to see a commit-
ment by G7 countries to fully
decarbonize their electricity sec-
tor and to phase out use of coal by
2030,” he said in an email.
Even as many developed econ-
omies are beginning to move to
cleaner forms of energy and re-
duce their overall emissions over
time, it is in the developing world
that scientists and environmental
advocates say serious funding is
needed to help nations develop in
greener ways and avoid locking in
fossil fuel infrastructure.
The world’s richest nations
have pledged repeatedly to pro-
vide at least $100 billion annually
in climate financing to help poor-
er countries deal with the im-
pacts of climate change and boost
clean energy — even though that
is only a fraction of the funding
needed for such goals.
But the developed world has
yet to fulfill that promise. Even
President Biden, who has asked
for more than $11 billion each
year in such funding, has not
persuaded Congress to provide
such an amount.

Key nations agree to halt government financing for new fossil fuel projects


WOLFGANG RATTAY/REUTERS
Steam rises from the coal power plant cooling towers of RWE, one
of Europe’s biggest power companies, in Niederaussem, Germany.

BY CHRISTIAN SHEPHERD

When China ramped up its reli-
ance on coal-fueled power plants
over fears of an energy crunch,
climate experts were already wor-
ried, but now a study shows that
the renewed mining will boost
levels of methane, a greenhouse
gas even more potent than carbon
dioxide.
The increased production and
expanded capacity from mines is
on track to add 10 percent to
global emissions of coal methane,
threatening to undermine inter-
national efforts to tackle global
warming, according to a recent
estimate by Global Energy Moni-
tor, a nongovernmental organiza-
tion that tracks fossil fuel proj-
ects.
While it is the carbon dioxide
released by burning coal that has
garnered most of the attention in
the fight against climate change,
methane by volume has far larger
effects on atmospheric tempera-
ture in the short term. Over 100
years, the global warming poten-
tial of the colorless and odorless
gas is about 25 times that of
carbon dioxide. Over 20 years, the
impact is about 80 times as large.
The study found that the ef-
forts by China to dig out more coal
had already released about 2.
million tons of additional meth-
ane from mines since late last
year when the government or-
dered more output to end an
energy crunch.
New projects from the mining
boom could add the same produc-
tion capacity as that of Indonesia,
the third-largest coal producer in
the world, and could release
6 million more tons of methane a
year, according to the study. Some
of the projects are mines that will
extract the black rock from deep
underground, a process that pro-
duces more methane than surface


mining.
“China’s frenzy of new mine
development is creating hun-
dreds of new sources of methane
emissions. While making recent
strides to meet its climate goals,

China still needs to reckon with
the potential fallout from a short-
term mining boom,” said Ryan
Driskell Tate, an author of the
study.
Despite China scaling up wind
and solar power sources, thermal
power generators that rely on

burning coal still account for the
majority of the its energy supply.
This model of economic growth
means China is the largest emit-
ter of carbon dioxide in the world,
accounting for a third of global

emissions in 2021.
Getting China, India and other
countries to rein in their coal use
was a major focus of the heralded
environmental Conference of the
Parties at Glasgow last year. Chi-
na pledged to peak its emissions
before 2030 and stop building

coal power plants abroad but,
with its fears over energy security,
it is using coal more than ever.
Late last year, power shortages
forced local governments to ra-
tion electricity across China as
coal-fired power plants failed to
keep up with soaring demand.
Residential power in some cities
was briefly cut, and factory activi-
ty was staggered to ration power.
The government responded
with an emergency coal produc-
tion plan, and China ended up
with a record output of over 4 bil-
lion tons last years. China already
consumes and produces about
half the coal in the world.
In recent years, a growing body
of research on atmospheric meth-
ane has suggested coal mining
has been underestimated as a
producer of the greenhouse gas
and may be as consequential as

leaks from oil and gas production,
the other main industrial sources.
Tate said an aggressive pro-
gram of capturing and using
methane, where a drainage and
vent system is used to extract and
store the gas from mines, could
reduce the damage of new proj-
ects, but there are few signs this
approach is widely used.
“From the perspective of min-
ing companies, methane is not a
commercial product, it is a waste.
They just want to get it out of the
mine as fast as possible,” he said.
“It is a global blind spot, but in
China, because of the scale of
their industry, the problem is
huge.”
The International Energy
Agency has said that coal meth-
ane must fall by 11 percent each
year until 2030 to achieve net-ze-
ro greenhouse gas emissions by


  1. Part of the difficulty in
    estimating the scale of the prob-
    lem is that mining companies do
    not necessarily track methane
    output regularly or accurately.
    Abandoned mines can also con-
    tinue to release the gas.
    Global Energy Monitor uses a
    project database looking at the
    depth and scale of mines, com-
    bined with a peer-reviewed emis-
    sions estimation methodology, to
    find the probable methane out-
    put. Its first global assessment,
    published in March, found that
    worldwide emissions of coal
    methane were over 52 million
    tons a year, with a climate impact
    similar to that of carbon dioxide
    emissions from all coal plants in
    China. The province of Shanxi
    produces nearly the same amount
    of coal methane as the rest of the
    world combined.
    Beijing declined to sign on to a
    global methane reduction pledge
    last year, but China and the Unit-
    ed States agreed to better monitor
    and control methane emissions


for the rest of the decade. As part
of the deal, China pledged to
develop a national action plan to
reduce methane emissions by
2030.
The two countries were meant
to meet in the first half of 2022 to
discuss measurement and mitiga-
tion of methane. While some Chi-
nese state-owned natural gas gi-
ants have released plans to reduce
emissions, there are few examples
of similar plans in the coal sector,
which is the main source of the
greenhouse gas in China.
Faced with limited data on Chi-
nese methane emissions, with the
last official figures for annual out-
put are from 2014, researchers are
increasingly turning to satellites
to track progress in curbing the
greenhouse gas in the country.
A 2019 study using observation
data from the Japan Aerospace
Exploration Agency found that
from 2010 to 2015, there was no
detectable flattening or decline in
methane release from coal mines
during that period, despite new
regulations meant to reduce
emissions.
“In China in general, there is a
huge emphasis, and rightly so, on
air-quality problems, a lot of
which are due to coal burning
creating pollutants like urban
smog. Whereas gases like meth-
ane, they contribute to climate
change long term, but they don’t
necessarily have that health im-
pact,” said Scot Miller, an assis-
tant professor of environmental
health and engineering at Johns
Hopkins University.
“The things that can be seen
and have a direct impact on pub-
lic health are taking on a higher
priority in China compared to
longer-term climate-related
trends,” he added.

Lyric Li in Seoul and Pei Lin Wu in
Taipei contributed to this report.

China’s renewed coal mining to boost methane, study says


QILAI SHEN/BLOOMBERG NEWS
The increased production and expanded capacity from coal mines is on track to add 10 percent to
global emissions of coal methane, the estimate found. Pictured is a coal site in Jiangsu province.

“It is a global blind spot, but in China, because of

the scale of their industry, the problem is huge.”
Ryan Driskell Tate, an author of the study,
speaking about methane output in China
Free download pdf