110
What cogni
communicat
Lakoff and
understandin
Moreover, u
knowledge w
whether ling
give it its pu
can imagine
cognitive de
(professiona
elements ne
language us
ones. Figure
between the
(specialist) d
Figure 1. Cog
A speake
to explain or
humorous, e
the intention
facilitate the
a (financial)
(^8) I understan
knowledge w
itive mechan
tion? What in
Johnson (19 8
ng and exper
understanding
we have of th
guistic or beha
urpose and exp
e, fatal for th
evices used, p
al) context, wi
eeded for their
sers with the
e 1 below il
e communica
discourse:
gnitive process
er/writer may
r illustrate a fi
etc.). He/she m
n to access a
e listener/read
) metaphor is c
nd culture here
we have on a cer
Chapter
nisms were o
nferences can
8 0: 5) observ
riencing one t
g what we rea
he source lan
avioural, is im
plain it in its r
he translator.
plus their inte
ill facilitate ou
r translation a
same precisi
lustrates the
ators when (f
in metaphor co
y resort to the
inancial conce
makes a men
a related met
der’s compreh
communicated
e in a broad s
rtain academic d
Five
offered by th
the readers ac
ve that “the e
type of thing
ad depends la
guage. Every
mmersed in cu
real context. T
Furthermore,
erpretation in
ur selection of
and making its
ion it affected
cognitive pro
financial) met
mmunication e
use of a meta
ept for whatev
tal realization
taphorical ling
ension of spe
d, the listener
sense, which in
discipline or pro
he author to
chieve? In thi
ssence of me
in terms of
argely on the
y human mani
ultural founda
To ignore this
a combinatio
their specific
f the suitable
s message rea
d the source
ocess that tak
taphors are u
exchange.
aphorical term
ver reason (exp
n of that conc
guistic form
ecialist discour
r/ reader/transl
ncludes the pr
ofessional activ
improve
s respect,
etaphor is
another”.
cultural^8
ifestation,
ations that
s is, as we
on of the
c cultural
linguistic
ach target
language
kes place
used in a
m in order
planatory,
cept, with
that may
rse. Once
lator tries
rofessional
vity.