outlining the operational requirements and
the intended service entry of the new Russian
fi ghter, even before the fi rst prototype had
moved to the production line.
The development of the Ye-155 proved
laborious and demanding and not all of this
was related to the confi guration of the aircraft.
It was clear that conventional aluminium
alloys would not be able to withstand the
tremendous heat, such as the nose and
leading edges. These would be constructed
of titanium, but many other areas could
theoretically be made of riveted aluminium –
such as the wing skins – which would have
to be welded steel because no suitable heat-
resistant sealant could be found, and there
was a shortage of skilled riveters within the
Mikoyan Design Bureau. Eventually 80 per
cent of the aircraft was tempered steel, 11 per
cent of aluminium alloys and nine per cent of
titanium.
Development of the Ye-155P interceptor
was approved in February 1962, and the
prototype took to the air on September 9,
- The aircraft was powered by a pair of
22,500lb Mikulin (later Tumanskii) R-15B-300
turbojets with a life of 150 hours, and was
fi tted with a Smertch-A radar, known to NATO
as Fox Fire; the radar had a detection range
of 62 miles. The aircraft carried two R-40
air-to-air missiles, in mixed pairs or R-40R
and R-40T semi-active radar- and IR-homing
versions. Look-down capability was non-
existent at the time.
The performance was up to expectations
and, in March 1965 – under the cover
designation Ye-266 – an early aircraft was
used to establish several performance
records which were countered by Lockheed’s
YF-12 in May 1965. Between 1965 and 1977,
the Ye-266 and another early variant, the
Ye-266M eventually made 21 FAI-notifi ed
record-breaking fl ights, setting nine records
which remained unbroken until 1994.
Foxbat production began in 1969, but the
aircraft did not enter full Voyenno-Vozdushnye
Sily Rossii (VVS – Russian Air Force) service
until 1973, having been plagued by engine
problems. Even in service the MiG-25 was
subject to serve operating limitations, which
strictly constrained the amount of time that
could be spent at very high speeds, so
limiting the use of full engine power. The early
models were delivered directly to the voyska
protivovozdushnoy oborony, voyska (V-PVO
- Anti-Air Defence of the Nation/Territorial
Defence Forces) Fighter Weapons School
and a front-line unit near Gorkii in order to
train pilots, ground crews and refi ne combat
tactics. This initial delivery was effectively
for in-service test purposes only. The aircraft
were intensively used for missile test fi rings of
the R-40 AAM.
The limitations of the fi rst production
series of the MiG-25P, (the Ye-155P-6 was
the fi rst fully equipped model), now known
in the West as the Foxbat A soon became
apparent. During production of this early
variant, the primitive radar was replaced by
the Smerch-A2 and later the Smerch-A3. A
typical attack profi le for the Foxbat would be
to launch a salvo of two missiles – one an
IR-homing R-40T, the other a semi-active
radar homing R-40R. Thus, the four missiles
carried, compared to the early variant’s two,
represented only two attacks.
A Lead Lost?
Although the MiG-25P fulfi lled most of the
design requirement with the VVS who were
extremely pleased with the aircraft, the
Foxbat’s secrets were soon to be revealed to
the West in 1976 following Lt Viktor Belenko’s
defection to Japan in his Foxbat A.
After the catastrophic loss of this aircraft,
the decision was made to develop a new
variant. A government directive was issued
on November 4, 1976. The MiG-25PD –
Dorabotannii – modifi ed – Foxbat E entered
service in 1979 and proved to be a far more
capable variant than its predecessor. The
most signifi cant upgrade was the introduction
of the Sapfi r-25 radar.
Based on the Sapfi r-23 developed for the
MiG-23, the Sapfi r-25 was a pulse-Doppler
radar with a genuine look-down, shoot-down
capability and slightly improved detection
range of about 71 miles. The new radar was
introduced along with a TP-26Sh-1 infra-red
search-and-track (IRST) system which could
acquire targets autonomously out to a range
of 28 miles.
The R-40R and R-40T missiles were
equipped with improved seeker heads.
For greater fl exibility, the MiG-25PD could
carry four R-60 (AA-8 Aphid) missiles for
‘dogfi ghting’. Along with the improvement in
avionics the MiG-25PD introduced the new
RB15BD-300 engine. Externally the MiG-
25PD differed from earlier models by having a
modest fuselage stretch ahead of the cockpit
to accommodate the new radar set. MiG-
25PD production continued in 1982, although
some aircraft planned for that year did not
leave the production line until late 1983.
Photo Foxbats
Whilst most of the West’s attention was
focussed on the interceptor variants
of the MiG-25, it has proved to be the
reconnaissance MiG-25, known in the West
as Foxbat Bs, that were operationally the
most successful. This led to a total of more
than 12 sub-types and one-off experimental
confi gurations produced.
MiG-25Rs began rolling off the production
line in 1969 and entered service with the
VVS soon afterwards. Front-line units tended
to have just one squadron of MiG-25Rs for
high-level, clear-weather, day reconnaissance
sorties. Pilot training proved to be a problem
however, and hasty changes were made to
the training procedures to avert any accidents
while fl ying at high altitudes. Successive
improvements were incorporated into the
MiG-25Rs, resulting in many aircraft being
upgraded to MiG-25RB standard.
Mach Three Bombers
The MiG-25RB entered service in December
1970 and its development occurred following
a request from Egypt which asked for the
MiG-25R to be adapted high-level bombing
missions. Carrying bombs on the mach 3
Foxbat was not straightforward. But the
design of heat-resistant coated bombs
The third prototype Ye-155 makes a fl ypast at Domodedovo
air display on July 9, 1967. This was the MiG-25’s fi rst public
appearance.
One of the fi rst NATO images of a Foxbat E released to the
media. Mounted under the nose is a highly sensitive infrared
sensor, whilst its radar systems had a limited lookdown,
shoot-down capability. The AA-6 Acrid missiles are the largest
production AAMs, with a length of more than 20 feet.
A clandestine image of a reconnaissance MiG-25 illustrating the
camera windows on the underside of the nose. Western analysts
spent hours pouring over such images in an effort to expose the
secrets of the Foxbat.
The MiG-25PD was capable of carrying four AA-6 Acrid radar-
or infra-red guided AAMs.
A MiG-25RBK Foxbat D gets airborne followed by a camera-
equipped MiG-25RB Foxbat B. The MiG-25RBK has a large
dielectric panel on each side of the nose serving a SLAR, and
had no under-nose camera windows.
MIG 25 IN DETAIL.indd 3 04/05/2018 16:25