INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE
WEBSITEwww.cae.com
Marc-Olivier Sabourin
Vice President and General Manager,
Europe/Africa, CAE
HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE A
‘21ST-CENTURY PARTNERSHIP’
BETWEEN CAE, ITS SUPPLIERS
AND ITS CUSTOMERS?
A 21st-century partnership is defined by
enduring characteristics, such as being
trusted, valued, effective, efficient and, of
course, safe. As we celebrate our 70-year
anniversary, these haven’t changed since
CAE was founded in 1947. What does
change, though, are the innovations we
bring to market to provide better training
solutions. CAE focuses our strategy
on being a training systems integrator
(TSI). When we say that, we are really
talking about developing a higher-level
partnership with governments and
militaries to look at their training enterprise
holistically. It also means that we will put
together training solutions that meet the
customer needs using the ‘best of breed’
components that are available to us –
irrespective of whether they are from CAE
or one of our industry partners. What is
critical to CAE is that we are accountable
for the training outcomes and our role
in supporting the safety, efficiency and
readiness of our military customers.
HOW WOULD THESE
PARTNERSHIPS BENEFIT THE UK
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (MOD)?
The benefits primarily are to the MOD’s
ability to force generate using the most
efficient and cost-effective training
solutions. For example, at RAF Benson,
CAE’s Medium Support Helicopter Aircrew
Training Facility (MSHATF) has been
constantly updated ever since this private
finance initiative (PFI) contract was let in
- Our training technologies and that
of our partners has been refreshed
throughout to improve constantly the
training delivery and ultimately the
preparation of the aircrews. And alongside
technology, things have changed
commercially and our innovation continues
into our contractual arrangements. CAE
is a company willing to invest and take
a financial approach that relies on long-
term partnership with our customers.
So, the MOD gains all the benefits
of a service contract but retains the
agility to adjust to a changing front-line
need and a partner that is very much
incentivised on their performance.
AS A WORLDWIDE OPERATING
DEFENCE-TRAINING
ENTERPRISE, HOW CAN CAE
HELP ITS CUSTOMERS TO
ENHANCE PARTNERSHIPS
BETWEEN COUNTRIES?
Collaborating on training has long been
a pillar of international defence relations,
but it is sometimes difficult to achieve.
CAE is a strong proponent of helping our
defence customers train as a joint and
coalition force, and we have numerous
examples of this. For instance, at the
NATO Flying Training in Canada (NFTC)
programme as well as our MSHATF at
RAF Benson, different nations often
train in a collaborative enterprise that
shares training assets and addresses the
immediate training need in a cost-effective
way. But, they also bring the intangible
benefits through the relationships
they are built upon – a classic ‘win-win’
situation. In the live-flying environment,
for nations with small numbers of
trainees, it also makes complete sense
simply because of affordability. And in
the future, this model can be as relevant
for remotely piloted aircraft systems
(RPAS) as it is for manned platforms, and
distributed virtual training will become
more commonplace among coalition
partners. CAE’s role as a TSI positions us
perfectly to be the training partner of
choice to our government customers.
HOW DO THESE RELATIONSHIPS
HELP CAE TO IMPROVE ITS
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES?
As a major global company involved in
training more than 120,000 crew members
annually across the civil and defence
sectors, we are in a great position to
exploit our data and information to
enhance our training solutions. The
training environment has embraced
digital media for some years, but we are
now truly entering the era of digitisation
where we can use ‘big data’ to provide
objective and adaptive training solutions.
This is exactly what we are doing at
CAE’s new Dothan Training Centre for
the United States Army, where we will
graduate more than 600 fixed-wing
‘Generation Z’ aviators every year.
A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO
DEVELOPING TRAINING SYSTEMS