Aeroplane – June 2018

(Romina) #1

Archive


112 http://www.aeroplanemonthly.com AEROPLANE JULY 2018

the Series 1 Ace prototype, G-AHLG,
needed a major redesign. On its fi rst
fl ight, Monty Brown wrote, test
pilot Rex ‘Ivy’ Stedman was expected
to make just a single circuit before
landing, “but the Ace took off and fl ew
almost out of sight”. When eventually
he returned, having landed the aircraft
very gingerly, Stedman “seemed quite
disturbed as he quickly went off with
Chris and co to the offi ce. Presumably
a large Scotch was required for Ivy was
clearly very pale and in a nervous state.
It later transpired that he experienced
a complete loss of rudder control;
in fact the turbulence created by the
wide cabin had made the tail controls
largely ineffective when fl ying just
above stalling speed. He had indeed
had great diffi culty getting the Ace
back on the ground. Within the

month, a new twin fi n and rudder
assembly had been designed, made and
installed to operate outside this area of
turbulence.”

With those modifi cations complete,
the Ace proceeded through test-
fl ying satisfactorily. Preparations for
production were delayed by a move
from Heston to Exeter Airport, but
in March 1948 the fi rst CH3 Series
2 Super Ace, G-AKFD, was ready
and made its initial fl ight from the
fi rm’s new Devon home. Among the
main changes was substitution of the
Lycoming engine for a de Havilland
Gipsy Major X. This time the length
of Stedman’s maiden trip in the new
aircraft was intentional, his confi dence
in it being such that stalls and spins

were evaluated. According to Flight,
“he found that the aircraft did not spin
but merely made a steep spiral turn
which was immediately corrected as
soon as the controls were released”. The
Aeroplane said it was “doubtful whether
spinning trials have ever before been
attempted at such an early stage in a
contractor’s fl ight-test programme.”
So far, so good. But Stedman had
plenty of experience of Chrislea’s
curious control confi guration.
What would a neophyte make of it?
Representatives of both main British
aviation weeklies were invited to
try out the Super Ace, their reports
appearing within a day of each other.
The account by Flight’s Maurice
Smith came fi rst. “It is usually possible
to get into a light aircraft and, after
a single fl ight, to give a reasonably

Probably the less experience a pilot has, the easier he would fi nd it; and a pilot


learning ab initio would acquire the sense as quickly as he would on a normal aircraft^


ABOVE:
Short take-off
performance was
a plus point for
the Super Ace.
However, The
Aeroplane’s Richard
Worcester reported,
“Pilots used to
conventional
controls should
restrain a wild
impulse to pull the
control column out
of its socket...”

BELOW:
The car-like controls
and dashboard
looked smart
and made for an
uncluttered cabin,
but were far from
universally liked.

The Super Ace’s
unorthodox fl ight
control system
explained.

111-113_AM_AeroArk_July18_cc C.indd 112 04/06/2018 07:22

Free download pdf