References
Harman, G. (1990). The intrinsic quality of experience. Philosophical Per-
spectives, 4 , 31–52.
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42 ,
335–346.
Harnad, S. (2007). Can a machine be conscious? How? Journal of Con-
sciousness Studies, 10 , 67–75. Also in Clowes, R., Torrance, S., and Chrisley,
R. (2007). Machine consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Harré, R., and Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harris, S. (2012). Free will. New York: Free Press.
Harris, S. (2014). Waking up: A guide to spirituality without religion. Lon-
don: Bantam Press.
Harris, S. (2014). The marionette’s lament: A response to Daniel Dennett.
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-marionettes-lament
Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (Eds) (2005). The new
unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal
sense of right and wrong. New York: HarperCollins.
Hayes, B. (2015). Computer vision and computer hallucinations.
American Scientist. http://www.americanscientist.org/article/computer-vision-
and-computer-hallucinations
Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision.
Visual Cognition, 7 (1/2/3), 43–64.
Haynes, J. D. (2011). Decoding and predicting intentions. Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 1224 , 9–21.
Hearne, K. (1978). Lucid dreams: An electrophysiological and psychological
study. PhD thesis, University of Hull.
Hearne, K. (1990). The dream machine. Northants: Aquarian.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behaviour: A psychological theory.
New York: Wiley.
Hermans, H.J.M. (2011). The dialogical self: A process of positioning in
space and time. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp.
654–680). New York: Oxford University Press.
Herz, S., and Schooler, J. W. (2002). A naturalistic study of autobi-
ographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: Testing the Proustian
hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology, 115 (1), 21–32.