Time Sep

(Jeff_L) #1
61

As the corruption crisis and the eco-
nomic downturn has played out over
the past four years Bolsonaro has found
his popularity spiraling upward. Highly
active on social media he has built upon
the base of police and military voters
that has kept him in Congress for almost
three decades. Polls suggest 60% of his
supporters are under-34s who are often
highly disillusioned but too young to
remember the military regime. Indeed
public opinion has actually turned away
from democracy. Only 56% of Brazilians
now say it is “always the best form of
government.” Small but noisy protests
calling for military rule have sprung up.
“Although there is a certain popular
outcry for military intervention from
what I see no one in the armed forces
wants to launch it as for us it would be
an adventure” Bolsonaro says. “I think
politicians and the people have to ind a


solution for Brazil in the democratic way.”
He does however plan to signiicantly
increase the role of armed forces in
government and society. “We intend to
have 15 ministers and about ive or six
would be generals for sure” he says citing
defense transportation infrastructure
and education. “You have to show that
you want a government with seriousness.”
By convention military personnel have

largely stayed away from top ministerial
roles since the dictatorship. He also
recently proposed increasing the number
of Supreme Court Justices from 11 to 21
in a move that echoes a 1965 diktat of the
dictatorship.
Can he conirm he would not instigate
a military regime if elected President?
“No there is no such risk. There is no
such risk” Bolsonaro says. If elected he
insists the next presidential elections
would happen as normal in 2022. “The
only modiication I would make is to
introduce paper voting to end electronic
voting. We distrust the electronic vote
here. That’s the only diference.” So
committed is he to democracy he adds
that he is considering a “political reform
proposal to limit a President to one term
only beginning with mine.”
But the ive portraits remain on his wall.
Under that regime nuns were raped. Men
were castrated. Mothers were mutilated
in the presence of their children. In 2014
Brazil’s National Truth Commission found
the regime responsible for the deaths or
disappearances of 434 of countrymen
and the torturing of at least 1843 others.
But because of an amnesty law passed
in 1979 no one has ever been convicted.
For Bolsonaro the regime was justiied
to maintain order and avoid a communist
“dictatorship of the proletariat” in the
midst of the Cold War. He advances
the revisionist notion that Brazil’s
military regime was not a dictatorship
and suggests there was no substantial
censorship of the press. “Nothing here
was controlled” he says.
The hundreds killed under the regime
were combatants in a war he argues.
“[The U.S.] did not kill anyone when you
went to Afghanistan? Here it happened
it was combat” he says. “Look you killed
[Osama] bin Laden. Why did you not
catch bin Laden alive?”
I begin to suggest the distinction
might be in a dictatorship killing its own
citizens. “No no no no. What is the
diference? What is the diference?” he
says. Brazil is not the only country that
had to take such extreme measures he
argues. Chile’s Pinochet for example
who killed 2279 opponents “did what

‘This is probably


one of the biggest
tests Brazil’s

democracy has
faced.’
Anthony Pereira director Brazil
Institute King’s College London

Bolsonaro and one of his sons Eduardo
in June. In 2011 he said he would rather
have a dead son than a gay one
Free download pdf