Enoch and the Mosaic Torah- The Evidence of Jubilees

(Nora) #1
Enochic Judaism — a Judaism without the Torah and the Temple?

Nehemiah 8-10: A Master Narrative

The whole narrative starts with the reading of the Torah and the celebration
of Sukkoth (7:72b-8:i8). Then comes the prayer where the foundational
events in history are recorded (9:1-31): creation, Abraham, exodus, Sinai, wil­
derness wandering, conquest, life in the land ending in a final disaster. After
the revelation of the law at Sinai, the apostasy of the people starts and in­
creases, especially after the conquest. The prayer ends in a petition for mercy
and a confession (9:32-37).^5 The narrative continues in Neh 10 by telling how
the people join an agreement to follow the Torah, which includes renounce­
ment of mixed marriages, keeping the Sabbath regulations, and obligations
toward the temple.


The different parts of the unit have different origins and dates.^6 The
whole composition is generally held to be one of the youngest in the He­
brew Bible; both Pakkala and Blenkinsopp see it as an insertion after the
Chronicler's redaction of Ezra/Nehemiah.^7 We are thus moved at least to
the beginning of the Hellenistic period. The date and origin of the prayer in
9:5ff. have been intensively debated.^8 After a long discussion Boda dates the
prayer to the period that preceded Ezra and Nehemiah, i.e., in the very early
postexilic period.^9 An early postexilic date seems unlikely, however, because
the prayer uses both the Priestly source to the Pentateuch and the
Deuteronomistic Work of History — for instance, it knows the literary unit
Exod 19-20.


We will first concentrate on the prayer. Already von Rad in 1971 charac­
terized the genre of Neh 9 as Gerichtsdoxologie, together with especially Ezra
9:6-15 and Dan 9. The history of the community was recalled under the per­
spective of disobedience to the Torah and contrasted to the patience and for­
giveness of God.^10 Boda follows von Rad and characterizes the prayer as a



  1. For the structure, cf. H. G. M. Williamson, "Structure and Historiography in Nehe­
    miah 9," in Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies (Jerusalem: Magnes,
    1985), 117-31 (here i2off).

  2. Cf. J. Blenkinsopp, Ezra-Nehemiah, OTL (Philadelphia: SCM, 1989), 284ff, 30iff.,
    3ioff.

  3. J. Pakkala, Ezra the Scribe: The Development of Ezra 7-10 and Nehemiah 8, BZAW
    347 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), 180-211; Blenkinsopp, Ezra-Nehemiah, 54f.

  4. Cf. the discussion in M. J. Boda, Praying the Tradition: The Origin and Use of Tradi­
    tion in Nehemiah 9, BZAW 277 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999), 11-16.

  5. Boda, Praying the Tradition, 189-97.

  6. G. von Rad, "Gerichtsdoxologie," in Gesammelte Studien zum alten Testament II
    (Munich: Kaiser, 1973), 245-54.

Free download pdf