Enoch and the Mosaic Torah- The Evidence of Jubilees

(Nora) #1
Jubilees, Qumran, and the Essenes

ownership of property, common to the Essenes and the yahad, whereas

members of the Damascus Covenant maintained private property.^24

There are two significant discrepancies between the Essenes, on the

one hand, and the yahad and the Damascus Covenant, on the other hand.

Essene abstinence from taking oaths is not attested in the scrolls, which

specify regulations for taking oaths before judges to affirm lost property and

mention vows as a normative and even frequent practice.^25 Essene rejection

of slavery is inconsistent with evidence from the Damascus Covenant, since

CD 11:12 prohibits "pressing" one's servant or maidservant (to work) on the

Sabbath. However, there is no mention of servants in the Community Rule.

Presumably, neither the yahad nor the Essenes used servants, since they both

maintained common property and aimed at socioeconomic equality. Inter­

estingly, recendy discovered ostraca from kh. Qumran mention the delivery

of a slave named Hisdai from Holon, and may attest to the dwellers' readi­

ness to accept slaves as property.^26

Several relatively minor differences are also notable, since they pertain

to social order, rituals, and taboos, on which sects put great emphasis.

Josephus's Essenes differ from both the yahad and the Damascus Covenant

in their social structure and types of leadership. The Essene overseers

(epimeletai) care for the needs of the entire community. They have complete

authority in directing the members' work.^27 Josephus also refers to Elders,

who are the leaders of the Essene group.^28 The role of the Essene Elders re­

sembles the total authority of overseers and certain priests in the Damascus

24. CD 13:15-16; 14:12-18. For the Essene communal ownership of property, see Philo,

Hypothetica 10.11; Philo, Quod omnis probus liber «'t86; Josephus, Jewish Wiir2.i22; Josephus,

Ant 18.20; Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5.73. For the yahad see, e.g., lQS 6:19-23; for the

Damascus Covenant, see CD 13:14-16; 14:12-17.

25. CD 9:8-12; 16:1-7. For the Essenes, see Philo, Quod omnis probus liber sit 84;

Josephus, Jewish War 2.135; cf- Ant 15.371. On oaths in the Damascus Document, see

Schiffman, Law, Custom, 204-11,220-27. Beall, Josephus' Description, 69-70, draws upon the

silence of the Community Rule in relation to oaths other than those of joining converts, for

creating a false parallelism with Philo and Josephus, while resolving the evidence from the

Damascus Document's different stages of development.

26. For the Essenes, see Philo, Hypothetica 11.4; Quod omnis probus liber sit 79;

Josephus, Ant 18.21. For CD 11:12, see Schiffman Law, Custom, 125-26. For the ostraca, see

F. M. Cross and E. Eshel, "Ostraca from Khirbet Qumran," /£/47 (1997): 17-28. The conclu­

sion that the dwellers in kh. Qumran accepted slaves as property is reasonable even if one re­

jects the reading of yahad in line 5, a reading according to which the ostraca attest to the ad­

mission of a new member and his property into the yahad.

27. Josephus, Jewish War 2.123,^12 9> 134-

28. Josephus, Jewish War 2.146.
Free download pdf