Australian Sky & Telescope - April 2018

(avery) #1

NASA / JHUAPL / SWRI / JAMES TUTTLE KEANE



  • ToseewhatwecanexpectfromtheNewHorizonsmissioninthecomingmonths,
    go tohttps://is.gd/newhorizonstimeline.


NEW ANALYSIS FROMthe New
Horizons team suggests that the
spacecraft’snexttarget,aKuiperBelt
object known as 2014 MU 69 ,mighthave
amoon.Theobjectwasalreadythought
tobeabinary,sothisbringstheparty
members to three. Planetary scientists
presented the preliminary results at the
meeting of the American Geophysical
Union in New Orleans.
New Horizons will fly 3,
km from 2014 MU 69 on January 1,


  1. Initial views, to be obtained in
    September 2018, won’t resolve the
    object—itwon’tbeuntilafterthe
    flybythatwe’llbegintoseehigh-
    resolution images of its surface. Data
    will continue trickling in through 2019
    and most of 2020. Meanwhile, New
    Horizons will also be exploring 30
    otherKuiperBeltobjectsfrommuch
    greaterdistancesthrough2021.
    In preparation for the flyby, the team
    deployed observers across the globe to
    monitoroccultationsonJune3,July
    10andJuly17,as2014MU 69 passed


TColored chords mark the path of background
starsasseenfromdifferenttelescopeson
three different days. The blank spaces on those
linesindicatethefewsecondswhen2014MU 69
blockedthelightfromthestar.

20 kilometers

July 10th Satellite
(based on occultation)

July 17th

Center
of mass

2014 MU 69
(shape based
on occultation)

infrontofthreedifferentstars.The
teamcaughtablipduringthesecond
event, then struck gold with the third
occultation, as five of 24 observers
caught the star blinking out of view.
Analysis of the third event showed
that the object could be a binary. But
theplotthickenedwhentheteamtook
anotherlookatthebliprecordedduring
the second occultation. A new analysis,
which includes observations of 2014
MU 69 ’s orbit around the Sun using
data from the Gaia mission, suggests
the blip is evidence for a third member
ofthesystem:amuchsmallermoon
orbiting at a larger distance from the
closer binary.
“This is probably a sign that the
object itself was not a collisional
fragment. We think [2014 MU 69 ]
was made like this,” says Marc Buie
(Southwest Research Institute).
However,hecautionsthatthethree-
bodyexplanationisn’tafinalresult;
further observations could change
the scientists’ conclusions. Regardless
of how many pieces the little world
consists of, it will shed light on the
planet-formingenvironmentofour
system’s earliest years.
■MONICA YOUNG

http://www.skyandtelescope.com.au 9

Meteoroids explode
from the inside
Space rocks breaking up in Earth’s
atmosphere might be their own Trojan
horses. Spurred by an attempt to
understand why the 2013 Chelyabinsk
meteoroid fragmented so easily,
Marshall Tabetah and Jay Melosh (both
at Purdue University) simulated the
rock’s interaction with the surrounding
air as it dove through the atmosphere.
The key was the meteoroid’s porosity,
which hadn’t been included in previous
simulations. Asteroids are more like piles
of coarse gravel than solid boulders. As
one of these rocks shoots through the
atmosphere, a bow shock forms around
it, with piled-up air in front and a vacuum
in the wake. This setup creates something
of a suction effect, with the high-pressure
air in front shooting through the rock’s
fractures to fill the vacuum behind. The
air’s infiltration breaks the meteoroid apart
from the inside out. The team’s paper
appeared December 11 in the journal,
Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
■ CAMILLE M. CARLISLE

Exoplanet loops
over star’s pole
Reporting December 18 in the journal
Nature, Vincent Bourrier (Geneva
University Observatory, Switzerland) and
colleagues have found that the Neptune-
mass exoplanet GJ 436b orbits around its
star’s poles rather than its equator. The
default in planet formation is for worlds to
coalesce from a dusty disk of gas around
a newborn star’s middle, a consequence
of the conservation of angular momentum.
Furthermore, huge planets close to their
parent stars ‘should’ be on circular,
equator-aligned orbits due to tidal
interactions. But GJ 436b is wonky:
The team’s 3D mapping of the planet’s
trajectory, coupled with measurements of
the star’s rotation, reveal that the gaseous
world is following an elongated orbit that
passes over the star’s pole. This setup
suggests that an outer, unseen exoplanet
might have driven GJ 436b inward to its
current location. The migration would also
have exposed the planet’s atmosphere to
more starlight and might have triggered
GJ 436b’s comet-like atmosphere.
■ CAMILLE M. CARLISLE

Next New Horizons target has a moon

Free download pdf